guys, I think we should do something about the small-drones tag before we go public beta
as it is, it seems rather vague.
i.e. if we define this by mass (sub 250), then it needs to be in the tag's name somehow (light-drones, sub-250, etc).
also then we need to retag LOTS of questions that are tagged with this, that do not reference sub250 specifically
alternatively, it can mean a wider category, i.e. something less than 3kg or whatever. But then, there's the question of whether we need it at all
the biggest problem with it right now is that there's a huge amount of questions that are (1) tagged with only this tag, and (2) are not actually about sub250g
I'm guessing it's used by people to sidetrack the "you must tag your question" requirement, especialy as it is (or at least was) the tag suggested besides the field
user435118
@FlashCactus agreed, you want to make a meta post about it or I can tomorrow?
As it is right now, the small-drones tag has some really serious problems, which we need to solve before public beta.
The overarching problem is that it doesn't really represent anything.
In the tag wiki the tag is defined as relating to drones that are lighter than 250 grams. However, neither...
That's good to hear, positive feedback from inside is reassuring. We have been waiting for the public beta to start before we begin advertising our existence.
btw, I foresee a lot more tagging questions, and while meta posts are great, they don't support lengthy discussions except in comments. Also we've got lots of small-ish tag-related questions.
So maybe we could move some of those discussions to chat?
Generally, the requirement to make public beta is 150 high-quality questions, which this site has exceeded. Sites are given three weeks to get to that level; however, if they reach it early, it will begin after two weeks.