4:23 AM
@JackRod Hi. Sorry I wasn't around. I'm not in the chat much at the weekends, especially in the afternoon.

7 hours later…
11:00 AM
@JohnRennie hi
I was looking for your view on this year physics Nobel are u available for it?

@JackRod Hi :-)
The prize was awarded to people working in the area of chaotic systems, and that isn't an area I know much about.

11:17 AM
@JohnRennie ok
I was quite amazed when I heard a climatologist got nobel!!

The prize was for the theoretical understand of the weather, and weather is a chaotic system.

what chaotics actually signifies? @JohnRennie

So I think the prize is more for increasing our understanding of how to model chaotic systems rather than specifically for climate work.
It's complicated to explain.
For any physical system we can write down a differential equation tat describes that system, then we solve the differential equation to predict how the system will behave in the future.
OK so far?

yes

A simple example would be a pendulum. The DE is d²x/dt² = -kx and solving it gives x(t) = A sinωt + B cosωt. All very straightforward.
In real life the differential equations are far too complicated to solve analytically, but that's OK because we can point a big computer at them and solve them numerically.
But there are some differential equations that turn out to have an unexpected behaviour.
For these DEs we find the time evolution is very, very sensitive to the initial conditions. That is, suppose we specify the the state of the system at time zero then use a computer to solve for the variation with time.
If we make even the tiniest change to the initial conditions we find it makes a huge difference to the time evolution.
So suppose we take two systems that are almost identical i.e. differ by only a tiny amount, and compute their time evolution, then we find that after a short time the systems are completely different.
And this is what we mean by chaotic behaviour.
I need to go now. I won't be around tonight, but I'll be back tomorrow as usual.