Sandbox

there's something for it in itertools I think

12:21 AM

sum(map(func, values), []) apparently

that is beyond cursed, wow

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: frickin python. I like fluent interfaces better than this ridiculous nesting

saaaaame

okay send the image again

anyway:

12:23 AM

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: TypeError: can only concatenate list (not "generator") to list

and that's why i love scala

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: In JS this would be soup.children.flatMap(translateTag).join(''). Nice and simple. Python is making me jump through so many hoops for this frickin

I'm considering making a new version of sechat in Kotlin

yes please

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: screw it, comprehension time.
```py
return ''.join([
i for child in soup.children for i in translate_tag(child)
])
```

now you're thinking with Python!

12:31 AM

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: @Ginger @lyxal one of you send the image again

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: AttributeError 🙃

Rick Astley - Never Gonna Give You Up (Official Music Video)

Seeing how it handles one boxes

Oh I know what I did

@lyxal already shut it off :P

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: Send the image

Rick Astley - Never Gonna Give You Up (Official Music Video)

12:34 AM

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: fricking typeerror again aaaaaa

do you even typecheck

:p

my editor says this is a str but at runtime it's a generator

    def translate_tag(tag: bs4.PageElement):
        if isinstance(tag, bs4.Tag):
            match tag.name:
                case 'i' | 'em':
                    yield '*'
                    yield from map(translate_tag, tag.children)
                    yield '*'
                case 'b' | 'strong':
                    yield '**'
                    yield from map(translate_tag, tag.children)
                    yield '**'
                case 'code':
                    marker = '`' if '``' in tag.text else '``'

why is join receiving a list that contains a generator

also yes I need to add case 'a', but first i need to get it to stop crashing

soup.children is a generator, no?

just wrap it in list or tuple

yeah but shouldn't the comprehension take care of that

i is a str. The comprehension should give a List[str], then, no?

why is it giving a List[generator] at runtime?

I've never used nested for comprehensions like that, so idk

maybe you have the fors backwards?

try for i in translate_tag(child) for child in soup.children

12:42 AM

nope, if I do that then the first child is undefined and the second one is unused

or just for i in map(translate_tag, soup.children)

@Ginger oh duh

If I spell it as i for i in map(translate_tag, soup.children) now i is a generator

i for gen in map(translate_tag, soup.children) for i in gen?

duh

what does translate_tag return?

translate_tag returns a generator

12:43 AM

^

hm

map(list, map(translate_tag, soup.children))

but then I need to flatten it -- that's why I'm using a comprehension instead of doing that

I need to turn an Iterable[Generator[str]] into a List[str]

check the itertools stdlib module

I think it has a function for that

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: I want to see if this double-comprehension works first

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: send the image again

ㅤ

12:47 AM

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: thanks

@Ginger can you do it?

wrong link

WELL SCREW YOU TOO PYTHON

guess what error I got

TypeError: sequence item 0: expected str instance, generator found

m = map(translate_tag, soup.children)
c = itertools.chain(*m)
l = list(c)
return ''.join(l)

trying this now

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: Please let this work

12:52 AM

NO HOW DOES THIS KEEP HAPPENING

EVEN THAT FOUND A GENERATOR

...oh

I figured it out

I'm yield froming an iterable of the wrong type

In any other language I would've gotten a type error long ago that my IDE would point out

always annotate your functions :b

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: I did... but the IDE doesn't warn me when I feed something the wrong type

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: I suppose this is my first time using a language that isn't compiled in a good while

success

Rick Astley - Never Gonna Give You Up (Official Music Video)

12:57 AM

hm.

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: Do I need to special-case ob-youtube? Try other websites' oneboxes

wikipedia.org/wiki/egg

Egg

An egg is an organic vessel grown by an animal to carry a possibly fertilized egg cell (a zygote) and to incubate from it an embryo within the egg until the embryo has become an animal fetus that can survive on its own, at which point the animal hatches. Most arthropods, vertebrates (excluding live-bearing mammals), and mollusks lay eggs, although some, such as scorpions, do not. Reptile eggs, bird eggs, and monotreme eggs are laid out of water and are surrounded by a protective shell, either flexible or inflexible. Eggs laid on land or in nests are usually kept within a warm and favorable ...

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: > Ginger: //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/54/Adolphe_Millot_oeufs-fixed.jpg/220px-Adolphe_Millot_oeufs-fixed.jpg//en.wikipedia.org/static/favicon/wikipedia.ico EggAn egg is an organic vessel grown by an animal to carry a possibly fertilized egg cell (a zygote) and to incubate from it an embryo within the egg until the embryo has become an animal fetus that can survive on its own, at which point the animal hatches.
> Most arthropods, vertebrates (excluding live-bearing mammals), and mollusks lay eggs, although some, such as scorpions, do not.

1 min ago, by Bbrk24

@element("f", 1)
def deep_flatten(lhs, ctx):
    """Element f
    (any) -> flatten list completely
    """

    @lazylist_from(lhs)
    def gen():
        for item in iterable(lhs, ctx=ctx):
            if type(item) in (LazyList, list):
                yield from deep_flatten(item, ctx)
            else:
                yield item

    return gen()

@element("f", 1)
def deep_flatten(lhs, ctx):
    """Element f
    (any) -> flatten list completely
    """

    @lazylist_from(lhs)
    def gen():

12:59 AM

testing with a really long message

@Ginger That broke but only because SE used a relative link

@lyxal That broke because I don't handle pre

@Ginger that worked

Okay stopping this for a bit to work on oneboxes

What's the python version of JS find / Swift first(where:)?

list(filter(fun, stuff))[0]

seriously?

yup

1:05 AM

there isn't even a first? because I could write that

there is not

def first(iter):
  for el in iter:
    return el

alternately, if you're sure the iterator has at least one element, next(iter)

but that raises StopIteration if the iterator's empty

I see

if soup.has_attr('class') and 'onebox' in soup['class']:
    ob_type = list(filter(lambda c: c.startswith('ob-'), soup['class']))[0]

idiomaic Python right there

1:09 AM

I hate it

import vyxal.elements
return ''.join(list(vyxal.elements.deep_flatten(lst, None)))

easy :p

if soup.has_attr('class') and 'onebox' in soup['class']:
    ob_type = list(filter(lambda c: c.startswith('ob-'), soup['class']))[0]
    match ob_type:
        case 'ob-image':
            return soup.find('img').attrs['src']
        case 'ob-youtube' | 'ob-wikipedia' | 'ob-xkcd':
            return soup.find('a').attrs['href']
        case 'ob-message':
            return 'https://chat.stackexchange.com' + soup.find('a', {'class': 'roomname'}).attrs['href']

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: I believe that should handle every kind of onebox

try them again

@lyxal test message

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: that just got translated as a regular <a> tag, not a onebox

how about the ping

how did that show up?

1:20 AM

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: Just the plain text "@lyxal"

interesting

but not surprising

because it was actually sent as @@354515

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: huh

(superping)

1:21 AM

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: ...that showed up as <code> instead of monospace

restarting it rq to check something

Okay I haven't fixed the code thing but try the xkcd again

soup.has_attr('class') is False

I'm checking it wrong

OakBot

@Bbrk24 Hi checking it wrong, I'm Oak!

class_

what do I need to do?

I got the has_attr idea from SO

1:26 AM

it's class_

not class

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: okay, try again

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: soup.has_attr('class_') is also False

darn

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: Do I need to check the root element and not the soup object itself 🤦

how would I even do that

keep in mind the soup is a single div and not an entire HTML document

> Since the BeautifulSoup object doesn’t correspond to an actual HTML or XML tag, it has no name and no attributes.

okay it looks like I can pass find a callback

does that work? send the xkcd again

@Ginger

1:41 AM

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: well I'm an idiot

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: NameError: none is not defined. Lowercase N.

try it again

I wanted to also try a gif

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: those both worked

Saul Goodman 3D | Epic Orchestral Version | 1 Hour

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: it still uses ob-image for gifs

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: do the really long code block again

1:43 AM

switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc
}switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc
}switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc
}switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc
}switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc

Oh I'm only translating divs not pres :facepalm:

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: I am now matching HTML with regex <:salpmao:530883329889927169>

do the codeblock again

switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc
}switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc
}switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc
}switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc
}switch (someChsr) {
case 'w':
case 'W':
    // some code for 'w' or 'W'
    break;
case 'x': // etc

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: my regex didn't work 😢

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: does . not match linebreaks or something

This room was placed in timeout for 10 seconds; the topic of this room is "Where you can play with chat features (except flagging) and chatbots without upsetting anyone." - conversation should be limited to that topic.

good question

no clue

how did it handle that?

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: > lyxal: <i>This room was placed in timeout for 10 seconds; the topic of this room is "Where you can play with chat features (except flagging) and chatbots without upsetting anyone." - conversation should be limited to that topic.</i>

1:50 AM

very interesting

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: there was an extra space in my regex

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: okay now try something with formatting (big code block, italics, anything)

Wilson

In the 1 month experience I've had with any programming language, I've assumed that switch case conditions would accept anything in the parenthesis as a boolean checking thingamajig, ie these:

|| && < >

Know what I mean?

something like

char someChar = 'w';
switch (someChar) {
case ('W' ||'w'):
    System.out.println ("W or w");
}

Sadly, doesn't seem to work that way. I can't have boolean checking in switch case.

Is there a way around it?

By the way, terribly sorry if I'm sounding confusing. I don't quite know the names for everything in this language yet :X

26

In the 1 month experience I've had with any programming language, I've assumed that switch case conditions would accept anything in the parenthesis as a boolean checking thingamajig, ie these: || && < > Know what I mean? something like char someChar = 'w'; switch (someChar) { case ('W' ||'w'...

oh I don't handle op-post

the code block still didn't work

what about inline formatting like italics

~~obamna~~ SODA!!!!

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: Okay I forgot about <strike> but the italics worked!\

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: okay try a codeblock again

1:55 AM

    if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {
    if (sr == null) {if (sr == null) {

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: ey there we go!

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: and the post just to be sure

4 mins ago, by lyxal

26

java boolean switch-statement case

In the 1 month experience I've had with any programming language, I've assumed that switch case conditions would accept anything in the parenthesis as a boolean checking thingamajig, ie these: || && < > Know what I mean? something like char someChar = 'w'; switch (someChar) { case ('W' ||'w'...

26

java boolean switch-statement case

In the 1 month experience I've had with any programming language, I've assumed that switch case conditions would accept anything in the parenthesis as a boolean checking thingamajig, ie these: || && < > Know what I mean? something like char someChar = 'w'; switch (someChar) { case ('W' ||'w'...

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: <:derpthink:814420575048040468> forgot the https: but the //stackoverflow.com... is fine

do the post one more time

26

java boolean switch-statement case

In the 1 month experience I've had with any programming language, I've assumed that switch case conditions would accept anything in the parenthesis as a boolean checking thingamajig, ie these: || && < > Know what I mean? something like char someChar = 'w'; switch (someChar) { case ('W' ||'w'...

(removed)

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: that worked, awesome

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: I'm stopping for tonight

12:42 PM

gjonk

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: So I have added some new features -- namely, changed the way that images work -- that I would like to test. But also comments

now how do you plan to test importing comments given that imported comments go to their own chat room

I was about to mention that :p

I meant the kind where you link to a comment and it gets embedded

oh

12:44 PM

ohhh

"boolean checking thingamajig these" are called "operators", and "tis Java" is made clear by the java tag you added. Also, the entire code snippet you posted is invalid (Java doesn't have a case), and { and } are misplaced). It's better to post real code you're having issues with; most of the time the act of making up fictional code either hides the problem or adds additional problems that aren't in the original. Perhaps a Google search would help - I tried case statement Java and the first result was helpful. — Ken White Dec 8, 2012 at 4:34

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: It worked

langdev.stackexchange.com/questions/178/…

𝙗𝙚𝙗𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙖: that one didn't

huh

no duh