tag-suggestionmeta Or perhaps we could create a tag called dead-links or link-rot or something similar? I'd guess there are a few questions related to this topic.
Thanks for posting an answer! Considering the recent comment by YCor, I suppose he would not delete the tag (models-of-pa) if somebody created it now. However, the other suggestion (cancelling the synonyms, renaming peano-arithmetic) can only be implemented by a moderator. — Martin Sleziak1 hour ago
Yes, they should, that was the intention behind it all along. There also has been a suggestion to disambiguate between "theories-of-arithmetic" and "models-of-arithmetic" or the like, but this can only be done manually on a case-by-case basis, and anyway, the latter tag was apparently never created. — Emil Jeřábek8 mins ago
Another thing to do would be to retag the questions which do not belong under this tag (if it is agreed that it should be restricted in the way suggested in the post). Either a new tag for this purpose could be created - there was a suggestion to call it classical-analytic-geometry. Or they could simply be retagged with mg.metric-geometry.
Well, the name (classical-analytic-geometry) was suggested by @DavidRoberts - perhaps you have another suggestion what to call a tag for such question. (If such tag is actually needed - that's for discussion, too.) — Martin Sleziak13 secs ago
I suggest having two tags: pointfree-topology and locales-and-frames
We should have synonyms: [pointless-topology] for the first, and [frames-and-locales], [frames] and [locales] for the second.
We can put the suggestion in the tag wiki snippets to add the other tag of the pair. But it's not alwa...
I suggest having two tags: pointfree-topology and locales-and-frames
We should have synonyms: [pointless-topology] for the first, and [frames-and-locales], [frames] and [locales] for the second.
We can put the suggestion in the tag wiki snippets to add the other tag of the pair. But it's not alwa...
I suggest having two tags: pointfree-topology and locales-and-frames
We should have synonyms: [pointless-topology] for the first, and [frames-and-locales], [frames] and [locales] for the second.
We can put the suggestion in the tag wiki snippets to add the other tag of the pair. But it's not alwa...
I suggest having two tags: pointfree-topology and locales-and-frames
We should have synonyms: [pointless-topology] for the first, and [frames-and-locales], [frames] and [locales] for the second.
We can put the suggestion in the tag wiki snippets to add the other tag of the pair. But it's not alwa...
Just to clarify, in the proposed tag synonym, some newly created tag would be a master tag? Or is the suggestion to create a synonym where the existing tag (locales) would be a master tag - and some new tags would be added as synonyms? — Martin Sleziak4 hours ago
tag-suggestionmeta Occasionally there are questions about spoilers - but probably not that many. Would having a tag spoilers on meta be useful? (It would be easier to find the previous questions about issues related to spoilers.)
Posts commenting some achievements of math.SE users have been posted quite often on meta. Usually it was about a user reaching some reputation milestone, such as 100k or 200k. (I also remember a post congratulating some users on reaching 10k votes, which also contained a suggestion for a badge - ...
tag-suggestionmeta Would the tag celebration be suitable for MathOverflow Meta? The situation is perhaps different from Mathematics Meta - there were many such questions.
There are also tag warnings - but that's something which is shown "for a specific tag* - the suggestion from François G. Dorais was about something which should be visible always when somebody asks a question.
tag-suggestion I do not think that would be actually a good idea - still I will at least mention this suggestion to have a "tag for Yitang Zhang results or Yitang Zhang theorem."
I have flagged the above question with the suggestion that status-completed could be added - of course, that means that one of those five tags will be removed from that question.
1. The suggestion is something which isn't really needed - since a mechanism to edit tag-wikis already exists. (For users below 20k+, the edit must be approved in the suggested edits review queue.)
Links to various files starting with http://math.uga.edu/~pete and http://www.math.uga.edu/~pete no longer work, but they can be fixed by changing the start to http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete.
Here are a few examples of such edits done manually: one, two, three. (Other examples can be found using...
Links to various files starting with http://math.uga.edu/~pete and http://www.math.uga.edu/~pete no longer work, but they can be fixed by changing the start to http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete.
Here are a few examples of such edits done manually: one, two, three. (Other examples can be found using...
Links to various files starting with http://math.uga.edu/~pete and http://www.math.uga.edu/~pete no longer work, but they can be fixed by changing the start to http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete.
Here are a few examples of such edits done manually: one, two, three. (Other examples can be found using...
tag-suggestion Sorry for the typo - obviously, I mean icm-2022. (In addition to that - would maybe having one icm tag be slightly better than having several separate tags?)
Just a suggestion - maybe you could also add (discussion) tag. In that way, the question would become eligible for the community bulletin and it would be more likely to get noticed. (Although in this case it is most important that it gets noticed by the mods - and they get notification about every new meta question in their moderator inbox anyway.) — Martin SleziakAug 1 at 7:05
Suggestion: Burninate the tag research (rather than remove it manually).
Burnination means that the tag is removed from all questions without any bumping. (Pointers to more detailed information about burnination can be found in the tag-info on Meta Stack Exchange. I have also included a short exp...
@YCor made a suggestion in an answer to another post (What is the intended use of the (proofs) tag?) a bit over a year ago. It received several upvotes, but does not appear to have been acted upon. I thought it might receive more attention here:
It's not exactly about the original question, bu...
@YCor made a suggestion in an answer to another post (What is the intended use of the (proofs) tag?) a bit over a year ago. It received several upvotes, but does not appear to have been acted upon. I thought it might receive more attention here:
It's not exactly about the original question, bu...
@YCor made a suggestion in an answer to another post (What is the intended use of the (proofs) tag?) a bit over a year ago. It received several upvotes, but does not appear to have been acted upon. I thought it might receive more attention here:
It's not exactly about the original question, bu...
Based on the feedback of the past week, I've gone ahead and created a tag (following Monroe Eskew's suggestion of "higher-order-logics" instead of "second-order-logic"). I've kept the tag description very short, and others should feel free to improve it.
I'll add this tag to relevant questions ov...
Thanks. I can't upvote it because I need 5 answer rep on this tag. This automatized synonym tag suggestion system is totally inefficient, it will probably still be pending in 2050 if no moderator makes the job... — YCor4 mins ago
@gmvh in any case I think it's not realistic to modify the name of a top-level tag (in terms of the likeliness to reach a consensus on this). Yes, I'm aware that there are drawbacks to this synonym suggestion. In any case I don't think this top-level tag / set-theory/logic issue is that important, and there are much worse problems with tagging.