The DMZ

A serious place where infosec is discussed PS we don't do hardware/software support (srs face -.-) https://security.stackexchange.com/
4d ago – Journeyman Geek
Journeyman Geek: 4d ago, 17671 posts (1%)CaffeineAddiction: 13d ago, 1510 posts (0%)Rory Alsop: 26d ago, 62302 posts (6%)
1030

export all events for this room

Starred posts

1 329 330 331 332 333
Feb 22, 2011 17:17
wtf Nature, seriously.
Feb 22, 2011 14:40
@Iszi You're like my wife ;) She waits until she gets to work to eat breakfast as well.
Feb 21, 2011 14:23
Unless you can tell your roo o iper from your gite gapas, you'd mebbe have trouble :-)
Feb 21, 2011 13:55
I think non-dairy creamer was only invented because some Americans complained they couldn't shovel corn syrup into their faces quickly enough if they had to drink things that didn't contain it.
Feb 21, 2011 12:45
or do you mean that he's Scottish, and therefore the time is always defined as "beer o'clock" ducks
Feb 19, 2011 23:28
only one thing you need to know: Fortify Sucks.
Feb 19, 2011 23:07
@AviD - under most Unixes, you can change the privileges of a process after you have initiated it, but if your privileges are revoked, the process won't be likely to know about it until next time you try to run it, or if it is told to check. Normally in the circumstances you are talking about, you would revoke privs then kill the process as a matter of course.
Feb 19, 2011 22:41
do linux processes change their uid/gid mid-process? And if not, that could mean that after you start a process, your privileges change, and yet your process could still have access you're not permitted to anymore?
Feb 19, 2011 21:51
1. How do we fix the general class of TOCTOU vulns?
2. how can we mitigate (i.e. workaround) for OS-level vulns?
3. I want to change the way Windows permissions and ticketing works, so I'm going to call it a bug...
4. I have a specific situation - temporary administrators - that does not work the way I expect, or want, because of the way Windows works. How can I work around this?
Feb 19, 2011 01:07
I kind of feel we have to stay within the rules otherwise chaos :-)
Feb 5, 2011 22:38
Nice quote from Ben Adida: "Security is about stopping the bad guys from stealing your data. Privacy is about controlling the good guys’ handling of your data. (Ron Rivest is said to have phrased this most eloquently, but I can’t find his quotation.)"
Feb 3, 2011 16:51
although - in saying that, 2600:0:7e1e:3975:dead:beef:1 would be cool
Feb 3, 2011 16:42
I love it - this is for real :) 2620:0:1cfe:face:b00c::3
Feb 2, 2011 15:49
Jan 31, 2011 20:57
@nealmcb Here is the meta discussion
Jan 30, 2011 02:15
@nealmcb You can't HANDLE the wildebeest!
Jan 29, 2011 01:30
Jan 28, 2011 22:39
Also, and I'm looking at you @RoryAlsop. WTF is a FAW?
Jan 24, 2011 15:00
afternoon all
Jan 21, 2011 02:55
you might get away with enteleca-2.dsl.easynet.co.uk:80
Jan 12, 2011 12:42
shit, I said cloud. BRB, got to drink a shot.
Dec 18, 2010 17:57
btw, for anyone wondering later - and not bothering to read the faq - chats are persistent, so you can leave a message for someone else, even if they're not in the room at the same time as you...
1 329 330 331 332 333