@HodofHod Definitely going forward, and I've gone back and deleted some of the more blatantly non-serious ones. My only hesitation about this one is that, well, it's lighthearted, yes, but technically correct and topical.
@HodofHod Tags as described in the linked-to blog post are explicitly discouraged by SE and we cannot locally override that no matter whether we want to, I think. I think the intent of lomdus was not to be the sort of tag describedin that blog post (though I don't have time now to check the questions and see whether that's what it's become). Okay, goodbye, for real now.
@MonicaCellio Here's to both of us getting Announcer. I think that'd be the first time two people get it on one question. When I saw the view count exploding, I was all excited about getting the first Booster, but oh, well.
What Formula Should Be Used To Determine "hot" Questions?
Based on my analysis of the above and the comments so far, here's the second version of what I have implemented so far. This might suck. I don't know:
(log(Qviews)*4) + ((Qanswers * Qscore)/5) + sum(Ascores)
... so it helps that it has 5 answers with a combined score of +29
The title looks weird "history - Who is..."; given that it's going to facebook, the chances of it being farmed would be pretty low (I only have 71 "friends"), and it reads really weirdly.
Should the FB Share titles be changed back to the normal, un-adultered titles?
For the record, I know why...