@Gigili You should really give listings package a try.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,listings}
\begin{document}
\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape=true]
[A] IF HALT($x,x$) GOTO A
$\Downarrow$ (counter(x))
[A] IF HALT(counter(x),counter(x)) GOTO A
\end{lstlisting}
\end{document}
Here it's Pascal by default but you can choose among many other languages for keywords emphasis etc. or make up your own
@egreg Oh my! :) I'll send him an email. :) After I posting the message in c.t.t, I had arara forked and a first attempt of a French translation was already made. :)
@percusse Neat, thanks. But I got "permission denied"! I'm going to write down my solutions which would take me 1/4 of the time that this TeXing takes!
I mean, arara runs and produces a log, and the message in the log is PDFLaTeX cannot find the file.
10 Nov 2012 23:39:14.208 INFO Arara - Welcome to arara!
10 Nov 2012 23:39:14.212 INFO Arara - Processing file 'my doc.tex', please wait.
10 Nov 2012 23:39:14.213 INFO DirectiveExtractor - Reading directives from my doc.tex.
10 Nov 2012 23:39:14.214 TRACE DirectiveExtractor - Directive found in line 1 with pdflatex.
10 Nov 2012 23:39:14.217 INFO DirectiveParser - Parsing directives.
10 Nov 2012 23:39:14.219 INFO TaskDeployer - Deploying tasks into commands.
10 Nov 2012 23:39:14.219 TRACE TaskDeployer - Task 'pdflatex' found in '/opt/arara/rules'.
@PauloCereda Exactly, I think the argument you should pass to the rule is only whatever that is within the quotes and not everything along with the quotes...
@kan I'm glad it worked. :) And about the other filename, I'm really sorry, if PDFLaTeX complains about it too, I cannot do much as well, since arara actually parses the file. What goes after it, it's not arara's fault.
1) and 3) Change none to white when filling the parts of the rectangles.
2) Change the stile for the line to have arrow tip only on one end (I wasn't sure which ones to you wanted to change, so I chose the two on the bottom).
4) One possibility is to draw the arrows first, and then place the l...
The comment is:
One thing I don't understand is, wrt 2 (the double headed arrows issue) you explicitly have latex'- in (for example) `path [latex'-, thick] (leftrow6.one south) edge[out=270, in=270] node {}(tuplebottomrow);` In my example, I use just \path[line]... where line is defined with \tikzstyle{line} = [draw, -latex', thick]. I don't understand why one worked and not the other.
On the bottom you terminate in between the nodes. Is that what you want as it is different that the other three cases where the lines terminate at the middle of the node?
Also I am ignoreing the "X" labels, and numbers - -hopefully that is something you can adapt?
@FaheemMitha Sorry, I don't know DNA sequencing, so just need to know is the way you showed it the way you want (where the one case of line terminations is in a different location)
Oh, you were trying to avoid corssing over the labels?
@FaheemMitha That's a problem with the arrow tip (I think it's a bug of miscommunication of edge and latex' arrow tip. Anyways, I wouldn't use this way but I think this works out OK.
@percusse: Looks like I was right about not pissing of another user: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/82210/…. But just in case he was I decided not to nag him too much about his recent question...
@JosephWright: This question on Meta.tex.se http://meta.tex.stackexchange.com/questions/2872/chemical-equation-in-background-is-incorrect is (a) in my eyes not a feature-request, but a bug report, and should (b) tagged with [tag:status-declined]. @All native English speakers: Perhaps you want to approve my answer.
@percusse Well, my logic is that if I keep close to @DavidCarlisle in rep that will keep him from slacking off and we can all get better answers. :-)
@FaheemMitha I haven't used those much, but the main point in my answer was really to change the way you specify things, not the implementation of the drawing (except for the node labeling).
@PeterGrill You native speaker! Do you think we actually think what we are writing? It's an automaton with finite alphabet mostly acquired through MTV Cribs :P
@Speravir Did you find the answer? It has been a long time since I've done redox chem (um, first year?) but basically the answer is that in solution you don't really get NaCl, you get Na+ and Cl- ions. The equation in the background is showing the movement of electrons from Na to Cl during the course of this reaction.
Should I wait until the new version has established itself across all the mirrors before posting an answer that requires it or should I go ahead and answer right now? Is there an established protocol here?
@Canageek The OP criticizes a wrong chemical equation in the site background (“Na + Cl yields NaCl and not Na + Cl”). But that’s, what the image shows: “2 Na + Cl_2 --> 2 Na^+ + 2 Cl^-” – well it shows more, but for the question that’s not important. Regarding this and after re-reading I must say, my answer actually isn’t fully correct. I’m going to edit it again in a moment.
Hey experts! If I'm making a font package that loads either the Type1 or the OpenType variant based on the engine you use, should I give XeTeX/LuaTeX users the option to override the check and load the Type1 font?
@Silex I don't see why one should want it in XeLaTeX; but in LuaLaTeX this might be handy: one can use LuaLaTeX almost as a drop-in replacement of pdflatex
Signs you are addicted to TeX.SE: You wonder why **not** is not showing up as bold in your document. The double asterix are there , and on both sides, so what could possible be wrong -- a LaTeX bug perhaps? Time for a new Question. :-)
1) and 3) Change none to white when filling the parts of the rectangles.
2) Change the stile for the line to have arrow tip only on one end (I wasn't sure which ones to you wanted to change, so I chose the two on the bottom).
4) One possibility is to draw the arrows first, and then place the l...
