« first day (785 days earlier)      last day (4219 days later) » 

6:00 PM
Done.
 
6:18 PM
@PeterTamaroff the $h$ just seems confusing, IMO
 
@robjohn Yeah, I guess. Innecessary...
 
A lot of books use h for delta x
 
@JohnJunior Yes.
This is cute $${\chi _{A\triangle B}} \equiv {\chi _A} + {\chi _B}\bmod 2$$
 
@PeterTamaroff ${\chi _{A\triangle B}} \equiv {\chi _A} + {\chi _B} - 2{\chi _A} \cdot {\chi _B}$
 
@robjohn $\mod 2$?
GTG
 
6:41 PM
@robjohn Have you seen this?
 
@JohnJunior What's it?
 
@JohnJunior I was like this when I saw it!
 
@GustavoBandeira don't you know Peter Griffin?
 
6:52 PM
@Charlie ik.
 
@GustavoBandeira ?
 
@Charlie I know.
 
could be this laugh too! LOL
@sabertooth Hey!
I love The Joker's laugh!
 
@JohnJunior :-DDDDD
@JohnJunior did you play arkham city?
 
6:58 PM
not yet
 
@JohnJunior $\huge\text {Really good!}$
 
I'll put it on my "things to do list."
 
@JohnJunior ;-D
 
;-D
 
:-*
 
7:07 PM
:-* did not match any documents :-(
 
@JohnJunior take a look
 
@Charlie The space after the look
 
@JohnJunior now you found?
 
@JohnJunior what the heck?
hehehehe
 
7:16 PM
I'm giving you the look.
 
@JohnJunior Fascinating!
 
;-*
 
@JohnJunior people will start to complain that we are giving each other too many smiles!
@JohnJunior Look what I do if someone complains
 
user19161
@gus How do you find the Paul notes so far?
 
@Charlie skullpatrol would not have it any other way.
 
7:29 PM
@JasperLoy They are good, I've downloaded them. I'm just not studying it so much because I'm kinda busy.
Today I'm gonna read a little of it.
 
@JohnJunior YAY!
 
@Charlie Now that I've given you the look that means you've got the look ;-)
 
@JohnJunior hehehe
 
7:48 PM
@Charlie The silver & black skullpatrol
 
@JohnJunior is the one I showed you?
 
@Charlie Yup.
 
@JohnJunior :)
 
8:04 PM
@JohnJunior it's a dead look ... badumtss
 
hi
if A is a ring, what does the notation eAe mean?
I think e is in A and it is probably an idempotent
 
@JohnJunior LOL
 
@Charlie Why do you like Charlie Chaplin?
 
@JohnJunior I like his type of humour.He says everything without speaking.He makes you think with his movies.You laugh and cry with his movies.
@JohnJunior why?
 
8:18 PM
Just wondering.
 
user19161
@BrunoStonek It means the set of all elements eae where a is in A. This kind of notation applies to sets in general.
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik I am trying to deduce a vector on the spinning planet but cannot understand a point:
 
@JasperLoy: thanks, that's what I was thinking it would be. In my context, A is a K-algebra, and then if $e\in A$ then $eAe\subset A$ is a K-vector subspace
 
@JohnJunior Here when the girl grabs his hands and realizes it's him...and he gives her "the look"...it's really touching...makes mewanna cry every time.
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik I have a ball in the North dropped and now I try to understand the point $[w\sin(\theta),0,w\cos(\theta)]$ near the bottom
(I have corelios -effect, the centrapetal -thing, moving coordinate -term and accelerating -coordinate --thing)
(i am stuck to this geometric point...cannot see how the $\hat j$ is zero.)
 
user19161
8:25 PM
I don't know physics. =)
 
user19161
Post on the main site. It's hard to understand your question like this.
 
user19161
Chat is for trivial questions only, like 1+1=2.
 
hhh
This is trivial: $w$ is the angular velocity of planet and $\bar v$ is the velocity of the ball.
 
@hhh I did not understand a word of what you said. Also, in that figure, I cannot figure out what you are talking baout. It will be probably better if you can draw a sketch representing just what you want to be asked. :-)
 
hhh
You have a falling ball.
The ball is twisted by the rotation of the Earth and its velocity.
 
8:28 PM
Okay, a ball is falling. Where is it falling?
 
hhh
Let say Germany :)
 
Okay, so you drop a ball over Germany? Hmm, okay.
 
hhh
I sticked the coordinates to the surface of the rotating earth, the reference frame of the ball.
 
Now, you mean to say the motion of the ball is twisted by the earth's rotation?
 
@hhh when you make that cartesian $W\times V$ you gotta take some derivatives, doncha?
 
8:30 PM
So, basically, you want to calculate the motion of the as seen from surface of the earth (which is rotating)?
 
hhh
$$\bar a=\bar a'-2\bar w\times\bar v -\bar\alpha\times\bar r -\bar w\times(\bar w\times\bar r)$$ where $\bar a'=\bar g$ (gravitation), $\bar \alpha$ is the angular acceleration of the Earth, $\bar w$ is the angular velocity of the Earth, $\bar r$ is the position of the ball in Germany falling, --.
 
And with this you lost me again. Wait a sec, let me get my notebook.
 
@JohnJunior why do you like skull?
 
hhh
where $\bar \alpha\times\bar r=0$ because Earth is rotating with constant speed.
So

$$\bar a=\bar g-2\bar w\times\bar v -\bar w\times(\bar w\times\bar r)$$

where gravitation, corelios -effect and central-petal-thing -effect (keskipakoiskiihtyvyys -thing in Finnish).
 
8:34 PM
@hhh What is $\bar{a}$? Acceleration of the ball wrt the point on the surface of earth in germany?
 
@hhh ok
 
@Charlie dontcha like skull?
 
Anyone mind helping with some linear algebra? =)
 
@hhh okay.
 
@JohnJunior :-D just a little
 
hhh
8:37 PM
@JayeshBadwaik $\bar a$ is the acceleration of the ball falling.
 
@hhh Wrt a point on the earth right?
Wait, you have fixed the co-ordinates to earth, so okay.
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik Yes like the picture shows
 
@hhh I didn't undertand what you didn't...
 
hhh
You can see there $\hat k$, $\hat j$ and $\hat i$ at the top. It is the point where the ball is falling in the direction of $\hat k$, pointing to the center of planet.
 
no I cannot
 
8:40 PM
@hhh okay, I am getting it now.
Now ask your question.
You want to know why the acceleration in direction $\hat{j} = 0$?
 
hhh
(fixed it with my wacom :D -- hopefully now clearer, the falling ball is the red point)
 
user19161
@charlie How was the test?
 
Okay.
@Charlie you had a test?
 
@JasperLoy it's tomorrow.Thanks for asking.
@JayeshBadwaik i have.tomorrow.
 
@Charlie Best luck.
 
user19161
8:47 PM
OMG I just got 40 points for aiming for some ground fruit @jay.
 
@JasperLoy Awesome!
 
@JayeshBadwaik Thanks!
 
Where?
 
user19161
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik Now I want to express $\bar w$ in the ball coordinates, how?
 
user19161
8:49 PM
Again, the result of algebra teachers not making students understanding their steps. It happens here on a large scale.
 
hhh
I know the solution i.e. $[\hat i,\hat j, \hat k]=w[\sin(\lambda),0,\cos(\lambda)]$ but cannot see it from the picture, some projections?
 
@JasperLoy Or probably too much homework and fatigue? I know your explanation is probably the more likely one, but benefit of doubt. Because, else, it would be depressing.
 
user19161
@JayeshBadwaik Hmm, not likely. Too much homework yes, but it is useless as they are drilled without understanding...
 
@JasperLoy Yup.
@hhh So, basically you cannot understand why the $j$ component should be zero?
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik precisely
 
8:51 PM
@JohnJunior "freak like me" she doesn't know what freak is...
 
user19161
@Charlie Neither do I.=)
 
@hhh Actually, that is the easy part. I actually expected you to ask why the $i$-component is non-zero!
 
@JasperLoy Dontcha?
 
user19161
@Charlie I know very few words. I don't read fiction. I only read math books, and "freak" is not in math books.
 
@Charlie who are we talking about?
 
8:54 PM
@JayeshBadwaik I was talking about this
@JasperLoy Nice!
 
@Charlie Ohh. Don't cha. Hmm. Nicole Scherzinger is kinda cool (if i have got her last name right).
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik Perhaps it is but simple things first, trying to do some new pictures to help here.
 
@JayeshBadwaik scherzinger
 
@hhh Try to picture the earth revolving underneath while the ball is falling from above towards the center.
 
@JayeshBadwaik this reminds me vector calculus.
 
8:57 PM
@Charlie It is vector calculus. "Physics is geometry --Einstein"
 
@JayeshBadwaik that's why it reminds me
 
@hhh Even better. Try to think of a train running on the ground in a straight line and a ball dropped above it. Now convert that train into a moving latitude and think of what should be the acceleration.
 
user19161
@jay You are a night owl too!
 
Bye @JohnJunior!
 
user19161
@cha What is the test about tomorrow?
 
9:00 PM
@JasperLoy analysis.do you wanna help figuring out one exercise?
 
@JasperLoy Yup, I like the quiet in the night. I wrote a poem about diwali nights some months ago describing the beauty of the sodium vapor lamps, the "akaashdive" or the hanging lamps and the chill of the winter air.
@Charlie I do.
 
@JayeshBadwaik yay,thnx
 
@Charlie I need some practice too. :P
 
"Let $f:\mathbb {R^n}\rightarrow \mathbb{R^n}$ a function that maps bounded sets to bounded sets. Prove that $f$ is continuous iff its graph is closed "
the part continuous implies closed is done.
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik xy -plane is a spinning circle. xy -plane and yz -plane have an oscillating point along their lines.
 
9:04 PM
so if the graph is closed, then $f$ is continuous.
suppose it's not continuous.
 
@Charlie Graph is closed means?
 
@JayeshBadwaik diwali is kinda funny,isn't it?party of lights?isn't it?
@JayeshBadwaik $G'\subseteq G$
@JayeshBadwaik you write poems...
 
Ohh you mean the set $(x,f(x))$, okay.
 
@JayeshBadwaik yeah yeah yeah(she loves you yeah yeah yeah :P)
 
Sie Liebt dich, yeah yeah yeah.
 
9:11 PM
@JayeshBadwaik yes!!!
Ich liebe dich
Beatles
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik Nothing?
 
@hhh I could not understand what you wanted to say.
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik "--think of what should be the acceleration" -Nothing, zero -- correct?
I mean the accelaration of the ball, the ball is not affected by the moving train or latitude or?
 
@hhh Correct.
 
hhh
roger that is why $\hat j$ is zero, now other terms...thinking.
 
9:15 PM
@Charlie You have closed and bounded sets. So they are compact.
 
@JayeshBadwaik the graph is closed,not the set.
@JasperLoy Good morning,Jas.
 
@Charlie projections? (nvm, they are not absolutely necessary).
 
Good evening
 
@JayeshBadwaik if the graph is closed,then there's a sequence that converges to a point of accumulation:$(x,y)\in G' \Rightarrow \exists (x_n,y_n)_n \subset G$ such that $(x_n,y_n)\rightarrow (x,y)$
 
@Charlie Suppose $E$ is a bounded set in $R^{n}$ then assume $(E,f(E))$ is closed. That means both $E$ and $f(E)$ must be closed, right?
 
hhh
9:24 PM
@JayeshBadwaik I cannot see the $\hat i$, how is it different to $\hat j$? Longitudial?
 
Suppose that $f$ is not continuous
 
hhh
Err it changes the longitude all the time! Unless corrected...with $r\cos(\lambda)$ or $r\sin(\lambda)$.
 
@JayeshBadwaik yes
 
So, the function pulls back closed sets to closed sets. Hence it is continuous. QED.
 
@JayeshBadwaik But the exercise doesn't say that the sets are closed,only bounded.
 
9:27 PM
@OldJohn Heeeey sexy old man =)
 
@N3buchadnezzar whaaaat???
 
@Charlie You are proving the reverse! You are assuming the graph is closed and want to prove that the function is continuous!
 
@JayeshBadwaik yep
 
@Charlie So?
 
@OldJohn I just wanted to grab your attention to help me with a few problems that have deadline for tomorow =)
 
9:28 PM
@JohnJunior Google image search says that is Ruben Cortada
 
@N3buchadnezzar LOL - OK:)
 
@robjohn damn it!I thought it was him... :-P
@JayeshBadwaik so...
 
Is a possible basis for the solution set of
$$\begin{align*}
x_1 - 2 x_2 + x_3 & = 0 \\
2x_1 - 3 x_2 + x_3 & = 0
\end{align*}$$
$$
\begin{align*}
\begin{bmatrix}
\phantom{-} 3 \\ -6 \\ \phantom{-}2
\end{bmatrix} \end{align*}$$ ? =)
 
@Charlie LOL!! If I run my gravatar through Google Images, it matches it to Aquaman!
 
@robjohn I would have preferred Rainman. :P
@Charlie so, the graph is compact (it is closed and bounded in $R^m$)
 
9:32 PM
@N3buchadnezzar it isn't even a solution of the first equation
 
@N3buchadnezzar Hmm - that vector doesn't seem to satisfy the equations
 
Oh, sorry. Of course Gauss jordan... I simply added them
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik $\hat i$ is projected to the $z$ -axis. $\hat k$ is projected to the $x$ -axis -- I cannot yet see why this way.
 
@N3buchadnezzar you need to find a solution of the two equations simultaneously - and examine the dimension of the set of solutions
 
@HenningMakholm Hallo!Wie geht's dir?
@JayeshBadwaik jay...I'm confused now...
 
9:35 PM
each of those equations defines a plane in $\mathbb{R}^3$, so the intersection could be a line or a plane
 
@Charlie Um, do I know you? (Are you Skullpatrol?)
 
@HenningMakholm I think so.The other day you said that I should speak german or dansk,I know a little german...
 
No, she is meandmath. JohnJunior is skullpatrol.
 
@OldJohn Seems like i end up with
$\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & -1 & 0
\end{bmatrix}$
 
Actually what I said translates to "Speak Danish, you German dogs!"
(which is the first half of a joke that continues "... said the farmer to the Frenchman")
 
9:38 PM
@N3buchadnezzar How do you get get a matrix???
 
@HenningMakholm I have a album by Maria Montella. (And so the story goes...)
 
@HenningMakholm It happens that I'm not german...and that was portuguese...you could have explained the joke...
 
@OldJohn Oh, it is just easier for me to solve the equations in that way
x_1 = x_3
x_2 = x_3
 
Ah - I like that better
 
@N3buchadnezzar LOL
 
9:40 PM
so - for example, taking then all to be 1, we have the vector (1,1,1) as a solution of both equations, yes?
 
@Charlie I strongly suspect the joke was no more opaque to you than the Portugese was to most of the rest of us.
 
@Jay
 
This seems very one dimensional to me
 
(I'm writing my vectors as a row to make it easier for me)
 
@HenningMakholm Portuguese.and I doubt of that...
 
9:41 PM
Since the solution is $x_1=x_2=x_3$
 
Yes - the solution set of both equations is a line - the intersection of the 2 planes
 
@Charlie I made a mistake of assuming that the graph is compact.
 
@JayeshBadwaik I was trying to say it...
 
I was trying to simply extend the proof.
I have a proof from Rudin, where I have proved that if the graph is compact, then it is continuous.
Problem 6 from the chapter of continuity
 
hhh
@JayeshBadwaik moved it here.
 
9:42 PM
But I wanted a basis for the solution
so I can use the basis t(1,1,1) ? =)
 
@Charlie Yup, you were.
 
@N3buchadnezzar so, a basis of a 1-dimensional space (the line) would be the set consisting of the single vector (1,1,1)
 
@Charlie I found this
 
@JayeshBadwaik brilliant Jayesh!
 
@Charlie what it just took a google search.
 
9:44 PM
@OldJohn: you put dark glasses on God?
 
@robjohn I like my blue glasses :)
 
@OldJohn I just discovered search on Google images... pretty cool!
 
@robjohn ah - you found where I got the original image from? (Man khoda hastam)
 
@Charlie I guess the limit approach is necessary, instead of the closed set approach I was talking as the compactness is not given and boundedness is a metric property, not a topological one.
 
@OldJohn I found it mainly on a YouTube Video
 
9:47 PM
@JayeshBadwaik hmmm. the given answer does what I already did...
 
It is a Persian YouTube cartoon - with the main character being "God" - talking abut various things - there was a great episode about the Higgs Boson :)
 
@OldJohn I added a link to my previous comment
 
@OldJohn indeed
 
@robjohn My Persian is not that great, but I an still amused by what I can understand of the episodes
 
@OldJohn My persian is limited to cats and rugs.
4
 
9:50 PM
@Charlie hmm. Let me prove it. I will get back to you with it.
 
@robjohn I like the rugs better :)))
 
@OldJohn we all need prostheses as we get older ;-D
 
@robjohn tell me about it :)
@robjohn I really like my gravatar, but feel a bit guilty that I have probably breached some guys copyright - and I did upset Gigili with it
 
@Charlie You can use the fact that the graph is bounded and closed, and hence, the graph is compact.
hence it is sequentially compact.
 
If I could draw, I would create my own version (I also liked the image of muppet drummer "animal")
 
9:54 PM
@Charlie Hence, every sequence has a convergent subsequence.
 
@JayeshBadwaik yes
 
@OldJohn she recognized the character?
 
@robjohn No - but got upset when I mentioned that it came from "Man Khoda Hastam"
 
@JayeshBadwaik every sequence is subconvergent...
 
she is a native Persian speaker
 
9:55 PM
@robjohn shorter way to write it?
 
@OldJohn ah, I can see that
@JayeshBadwaik no, just playing with words.
 
@robjohn okay.
 
@OldJohn I have found that out.
 
@Jay I don't if this is right...
 
@robjohn I got into a silly argument about the meaning of the Persian words
 
9:57 PM
@Charlie If this is the right approach?
Hmm, me too.
 
@JayeshBadwaik exactly
 
@OldJohn I wouldn't have been able to do that.
 
I'm starting to have pre test anxiety...palpitation...fast breath...
 
Oh dear. That is bad.
 
@robjohn The Youtube videos are actually the creation of a sort of group of Persian atheists trying to promote rational thinking, I believe - I was pointed to them by an Iranian friend/teacher
 
10:00 PM
@JayeshBadwaik once I made a real analysis test with so much nausea...I couldn't even move my head an epsilon without losing my balance...
or throwing up
was a bad day...
 
@Charlie hmm. You can do the problem easily with projections. If you want to use the projectiosn that is.
 
@JayeshBadwaik hmm
 
Sigh. Any quick tips to showing $\left\{ f(x,y,z) \in \mathbb{R}^3 \; \mid \: x = 3y \ \text{and} \ z = -y\right\}$
 
@Charlie no, just a little hungry.
Will raid my fridge to see what I have. Thinking of making french toast for breakfast.
 
Is a subspace of $\mathbb{R}^3$ under the operations of addition and scalar multiplication defined on $\mathbb{R}^3$?
 
10:04 PM
@JayeshBadwaik tasty!
 
@Charlie Yeah, the thing is there are eggs and milk in the fridge, if I don't finish it, it would go stale.
 
@N3buchadnezzar That seems to be a subspace spanned by (3,1,-1)
 
@Charlie The projection thing is simple. it is a simple map $\pi_X : X \times Y \mapsto X$ and it is continuous.
 
@JayeshBadwaik then :FINISH THEM!
 
in other words, any vector in that set is of the form (3k, k, -k) for some real number k
 
10:06 PM
math.ntnu.no/emner/TMA4145/2012h/exercises/oving5.pdf It is the first one here. Usually these things are easy to prove. One just multiplies it by k or some other konstant and shws it still lies in the space.
 
So, using that, you can pull back closed sets from closed sets.
 
@JayeshBadwaik YES
 
you can do the same to $\pi_Y: X \times Y \mapsto Y$
 
@OldJohn I see thanks =)
 
so you just need to show that the set of all vectors (3k,k,-k) is a subspace - i.e. closed under addition and scalar mult
 
10:07 PM
Also, you use the fact that $Y$ is compact.
To make $\pi_X$ a closed map.
And then you are done.
 
@N3buchadnezzar I can't always remember the precise words to use in Linear algebra, but I still remember the basic ideas :)
 
I still don't know...
 
=)
Yeah, I just need a small push in order to complete these things.
Thanks a bunch for helping me otherwise, I am not sure I would have been able to.
 
@Charlie I am hungry now. Will come back in some time. Will try to finish it off completely.
 
@N3buchadnezzar No problem - it is actually quite fun trying to recall stuff I did so many years ago :)
 
10:10 PM
@JayeshBadwaik Thanks Jay.Bon appetit!
 
I think it is important to get a feel for what is going on with these things, as well as being able to work with the precise definitons
 
@Charlie Think of the simple function $f(\bar{x}) = ||x||$
It maps bounded sets to bounded sets right?
It is also continuous.
 
10:25 PM
@OldJohn Any tops on this one?
$\{ (x,y,z)\in\mathbb{R}^3\mid \, 5x^2 - 3y^2 + 6z^2 \} $
 
@N3buchadnezzar erm - something missing at the end there, I think?
 
ah!
Hmm - I don't see that one being a linear subspace ...
 
I gave a suprised face, and I answered your question!
 
@JayeshBadwaik Oh, Jayesh...
 
10:28 PM
@Charlie what?
 
@JayeshBadwaik I'm freakin' nervous!
 
@N3buchadnezzar It is definitely not a subspace :)
 
user19161
@Charlie Well, drink some beer then.
 
user19161
More beer, less nervousness!
 
@JasperLoy You know I don't drink...
 
10:36 PM
@Charlie Even @JasperLoy doesn't
 
user19161
@Charlie No, I don't know that. You are not Muslim or Jewish are you?
 
user19161
@JayeshBadwaik I mostly drink tea, coffee, pepsi, coca cola, and water. QED.
 
@JasperLoy No,I already said that.
I'm catholic...
@Jas
 
user19161
Ah OK.
 
@Charlie Catholics drink too
 
10:44 PM
@N3buchadnezzar I'm different.Priests should not be pedophiles,some are...
 
@Charlie So you like children huh? Well thats cool bro
 
@N3buchadnezzar I don't like children.You are misunderstanding me...
 
@Charlie It was a joke! Take life easy, I understood what you meant.
 
@N3buchadnezzar don't joke about these things...
 
Well if you do not do anything crazy and live a boring live. Then what have you done in your life, spent it reading books? I mean I love reading books,but heck I also need to have fun. Chat with people, drink have fun.
 
10:47 PM
@N3buchadnezzar "do you like children? - yes, but I couldn't eat a whole one" (quote from some comedy film)
 
@N3buchadnezzar I'm talking to people right now.And I don't like drinking...Yes I Spend my life studying and reading and listening some good music.I never got hurt because of that.I'm not a type of girl who likes "parties", so what,I'm like that...
 
I hate parties too ;)
 
I like my liver...
 
Your argument is the same as saying you are a vegetarian, because you do not like the places they serve meat.
 
10:54 PM
@N3buchadnezzar no it's not
 
The point of life is to live, not merely exist.
 
@N3buchadnezzar Is snus legal in Norway? - and if so, is it commonly used?
 
@N3buchadnezzar You think living is doing those things you said?
 
@OldJohn Yes, and it deppends where you are. Where i live maybe 1/10 does it. But smoking is much rarer between younger people.
 
Ihteresting - I used to smoke years ago, and managed to quit by using snus
 
10:58 PM
I think you do not drink, not because of your liver, but because you are afraid of letting go. You hurdle up inside a shell and is afraid of what is outside, therefore you coat yourself in "reasons" and "believes" so you can continue doing what you have always been doing. Never daring, never doing anything out of the ordinary.
 
@N3buchadnezzar I see no problem in living like that...
 

« first day (785 days earlier)      last day (4219 days later) »