« first day (1580 days earlier)      last day (3339 days later) » 
00:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

12:08 AM
has anybody here studied causal structure approaches to quantum gravity, or category theory for physics?
 
12:42 AM
Neat -- photo of light as a wave and particle at the same time:
 
1:02 AM
3
Q: Careers in physics that are related to quantum mechanics or relativity?

fiftyeightPersonally I learned Physics in high-school and found it very interesting, I read up a lot about physics in my free time. Personally I am also a programmer which I think is also good when it comes to Physics. Now I want to start studying in a university and my dilemma right is mainly between Ma...

On-topic?
 
1:28 AM
That question's 3 years old
It strikes me as a "big list" question. Aren't those generally off-topic?
 
2:02 AM
Not to fuel @ACuriousMind 's paranoia any more, but NikolajK posted an odd comment to annav 's answer on this meta question: meta.physics.stackexchange.com/questions/6567/…
 
 
1 hour later…
3:19 AM
@alarge So going to your point about converting 2nd order ODEs to first order ODEs which one is which in the Hamiltonian vs Lagrangian case? After all, these are partial differential equations, so I don't know if that matters.
I am still confused why the EL equations is one equation but Hamilton's equations of motions involve two separate equations.
I don't follow how the conversion of a higher order differential equation to a first order differential equation applies in this case.
 
user54412
@StanShunpike Haha. He was one of the first people I met there. He also had a harpsichord in his dorm room. What a weird and awesome place it was.
 
that's hilarious. I hadn't heard about the harpsichord.
 
user54412
@StanShunpike About Mars, I feel like one-way trips might be doable (and there would be no shortage of volunteers) in our lifetime, maybe. But right now I'm pretty sure you'd be dead on arrival due to radiation poisoning.
 
From what? The sun?
 
user54412
Everyone gets so caught up in the sociology and the difficulty of returning and how to make a self-sustaining colony, but they gloss over the fact that shielding against radiation is not a solved problem.
 
user54412
3:25 AM
And cosmic rays.
 
Yeah, because of no magnetic field you mean on mars?
 
user54412
Yeah, there's no magnetic field, nor is there an atmosphere to speak of -- Mars is essentially vacuum
 
right, that's why I'm amazed people talk about going there. It's like they think it's going to be Earth Part 2 or something
 
user54412
Remember, even the shortest path through Earth's atmosphere amounts to the same column density as 10 meters of liquid water or 1 meter of lead.
 
Wow, that's a convenient way to think about it.
Have they tested the problems with radiation on the moon. Or even just the Space Station?
Like, how would people sustain food?
 
user54412
3:31 AM
I feel like there must be some experiments, but certainly the space station crew relies on dried food shipped from the ground.
 
user54412
I was talking with a guy who went to the space station as a Russion "tourist" and he said when new food shipments arrive the astronauts binge on the shrimp cocktails, since they taste best. Then they spend the next couple months eating the lesser foods.
 
That's funny. Humans are predictable. I wonder how they ration it or if they even do.
I've heard that the lack of gravity affects bones and creates other problems.
Stuff you don't notice because we always have earth's field acting on us.
 
In theory, you could terraform mars and get the atmosphere thicker, would take maybe 100 years.
There is lots of frozen CO2 and water on mars.
 
user54412
I've heard that idea before, but I'm skeptical how well it would work
 
user54412
Mars is also pretty light -- it's easy for gasses to escape its gravity, so without continuous replenishment you'd only have a temporary solution
 
user54412
3:37 AM
I'm just not sure offhand what the timescale for leakage is
 
timescale is 50 million years, mostly due to stripping from the solar wind.
So if you could "gas it up" it would be good for quite a while.
 
user54412
I guess that's considered a long timescale for some applications :)
 
You get the atmosphere up a bit and then if you can get just a bit of O2 in it, you could support plant life (in theory). Then they'd get you more O2 over time.
I think the lack of magnetic field mostly protects against gamma rays (?) If you had a thick atmosphere, that would help quite a bit.
 
user54412
If nothing else, we could probably grow tomatoes quite well -- I understand that they are C02 limited here on Earth
 
Not much nitrogen on Mars though. Maybe we'd have to crash a few comets into it for the ammonia.
 
user54412
3:43 AM
@Jiminion Magnetic fields protect against charged particles (which have a habit of spawning showers of more particles). Typical gamma rays are really just stopped by matter. It doesn't matter what the matter is, just how much there is along the line of site (really how many electrons, which is proportional to mass).
 
How bad are charged particles? Isn't that solar wind stuff?
Mars is farther away than the Earth, so the solar wind is much less intense (so is the sunlight....)
 
user54412
Here's an example of how charged particles can be nasty even (especially) when you stop them:
 
user54412
2
Q: Leakage of X-ray radiation

Lee YiyuanSuppose a sample of strontium-90 is stored in a lead container with lead walls. It is know that X-ray radiation may be detected outside the lead container. After some discussion with my peers, it seems that we have differing theories on how the X-ray radiation is formed. Beta particles emitted ...

 
user54412
In short, they can induce lots of secondary radiation
 
user54412
In some sense, insufficient shielding can be worse than no shielding at all
 
3:52 AM
I think a lot of tough lessons would be learned by trying to live on Mars, but it's the second most habitable region in the solar system -- hard to ignore the prospect.
 
user54412
Our solar system does have something of a dearth of liquid water
 
user54412
Actually, some astronomers have turned their detection toward "exomoons." The idea is that even if the only planet at a nice distance from a star is a gas giant, it could have lots of moons with solid surfaces and atmospheres.
 
user54412
That's actually a cool sci-fi premise I wonder if anyone has explored -- a civilization on such a habitable moon might have equally habitable moons right next door.
 
That was basically the premise of Firefly; we trashed our planet and moved to a system that had something like 70 habitable moons in it.
 
4:22 AM
Speaking of which, has anyone heard that one thing of Lawrence Krauss talking about Interstellar?
He hates it! Absolute buzz-kill!
it had its "moments", sure...
Also I did not know that was the premise of Firefly @Jiminion
 
5:20 AM
@Qmechanic I don't think so
@DaveCoffman (1) try to find something else that can be improved which will boost the edit up to 6 characters (2) if that doesn't work, leave a comment pointing out the change you think needs to be made (3) if the comment doesn't get a response after a few days, post it in chat and hope a higher-rep user sees it and makes the edit
I'd point out for the record that anything that can be fixed with an edit is generally not a valid use of a flag.
 
5:56 AM
6
Q: How would changes in the Earth's magnetic field affect space exploration?

user215721It is well-known that the Earth's magnetic field may flip (geomagnetic reversal), and some data suggests it is weakening or distorting. The following shows the Earth's magnetic field at its surface in June 2014 (by ESA) which shows some distortion. My question is, can such changes in the Earth...

 
 
3 hours later…
8:52 AM
I'm trying to learn more about Yang Mills theory. I am very confused by the $F$. Is this the Faraday tensor or is this some other thing that involves a commutator with guage covariant derivatives?
That's nor intentionally supposed to be vague, I just assume if you (the answerer) are familiar with Yang Mills you will know what I am referring to.
Not*
 
9:30 AM
@StanShunpike let me suggest that that is (almost) never a good assumption to make. Even when communicating with experts you often have to define your notation.
That being said, I'd guess the $F$ you're referring to is the analogue of the Faraday tensor.
Yang–Mills theory is a gauge theory based on the SU(N) group, or more generally any compact, semi-simple Lie group. Yang–Mills theory seeks to describe the behavior of elementary particles using these non-Abelian Lie groups and is at the core of the unification of the electromagnetic and weak forces (i.e. U(1) × SU(2)) as well as quantum chromodynamics, the theory of the strong force (based on SU(3)). Thus it forms the basis of our understanding of particle physics, the Standard Model. == History and theoretical description == In a private correspondence, Wolfgang Pauli formulated in 1953 a six...
 
10:02 AM
@DavidZ Point taken. I will remember in future.
@DavidZ the equation I have in mind reads $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{gf}} = -\frac{1}{4} F^{a\mu\nu}F^{a}_{\mu\nu}$. Assuming this is the Faraday tensor, why does this particular Yang Mills equation include the Faraday tensor? I thought Yang Mills was used in QCD.
And I thought QCD had not been formally unified yet with electroweak interaction.
 
10:26 AM
@StanShunpike In general, the $F$ corresponds to the curvature of a $\mathfrak{g}$ Lie algebra valued form. This is particularly evident when you look at the commutator of covariant derivatives. For Yang-Mills, the Lie group is $SU(N)$.
 
@JamalS what kind of form?
 
@StanShunpike Well, for example, in Maxwell theory $U(1)$ is abelian, so $F$ is just $dA$, where $A$ is the $4$-potential.
 
Oh so differential forms then.
 
Oh, yes, by form I mean differential form.
 
@JamalS Okay. I didn't realize forms could be Lie Algebra valued.
That's an interesting property
 
10:33 AM
Yes, that is, it takes values in the Lie algebra, the vector space equipped with the Lie bracket.
 
Hmmm...okay that's all very helpful. I guess knowing this, I need to spend some more time getting acquainted with Yang-Mills. But these were all useful pieces of info. Grazie
 
That paper may be useful to you, if you're interested in the historical development and 'physical idea' behind the theory.
 
11:18 AM
@StanShunpike it's not actually the Faraday tensor, as I said; it's the analogue of the Faraday tensor for a nonabelian gauge group.
The definition is in the Wikipedia page: $F^a_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A^a_\nu - \partial_\nu A^a_\mu + gf^{abc}A^b_\mu A^c_\nu$
For an abelian theory, like QED, the last term (specifically the $f^{abc}$s) is zero, and in that case $F$ is the Faraday tensor. For a nonabelian theory, a.k.a. a Yang-Mills theory, the last term is not zero, and $F$ is what I'm calling the analogue of the Faraday tensor.
 
11:40 AM
@DavidZ Does one only call it Yang-Mills in the case of a nonabelian gauge group? I thought electrodynamics was the simplest example of Y-M.
 
In my experience, Yang-Mills means a nonabelian gauge group
 
Interesting, thanks
 
The reason being that Yang & Mills' contribution to the field was extending the formalism of gauge theories to the nonabelian case. Before that people had only used abelian gauge theories.
(or so I've heard)
 
Wikipedia seems to agree with you
 
 
2 hours later…
2:14 PM
Formatting question: With standard paragraph indents in LaTeX, one sometimes gets really awkward indentation after an equation. What is you guys' favorite way to 'do' paragraphs in LaTeX?
 
@Danu Don't smash enter after equations, comment out the empty lines.
 
@alarge Okay, this was my solution too. The thing is, I'm editing a 83-page document that doesn't do this, so it can get kinda annoying
 
Well you could just search&replace \noindent after each \end{align} or something. not a pretty solution, but hey. Or while you're at it, you could just erase the empty lines after equations with some regex magic. Yes, there will probably be a couple of places where you actually wanted the new paragraph, so... have fun.
 
@alarge Yeah... :P
It's nice to do something like this though, it forces you to think about these issues.
For instance, I learned the difference between -, -- and ---
...and discovered I had some pre-existing opinions on how to use them, too :)
 
Have you not learned that in class? I mean the different lines are used even in hand-written (and newspaper) text, right.
 
2:34 PM
@alarge Nah, not really
I didn't know the difference between -- and ---
...and it's totally unimportant :P
But I like to know it and correctly apply them anyways
Also, is there any reason for leaving two spaces after a period in a .tex file?
apart from 'because I can'?
 
So I'd just like to say that as of today, my union is on strike
 
2:51 PM
@JimdalftheGrey Union of... what exactly?
$\operatorname{Hom}$ is supposed to denote homomorphisms, right?
 
York U? Grad students?
 
@Jiminion Actually, I'm contract faculty, but yes
 
How are people going to get their equations renormalized? They need that every day!
 
UToronto is on strike too
 
why?
 
2:56 PM
stupid reasons
the union asked for too much in bargaining and wasn't willing to negotiate. Same old story
 
Hey, you're supposed to be on their side, no?
 
I voted for the strike, but that doesn't mean I agree with why they wanted it
 
What does ~ in front of something in a latex equation do?
 
extra space I think
 
mkay
 
3:12 PM
@tpg2114: You'll be happy. I've decided to give a quick ~20 minute lecture on colormaps for our weekly Astro seminar.
 
3:43 PM
@Danu In text mode a tilde is an non-breaking space. It prints as a space, but tell the layout engine to treat the two bits as a single word for layout purposes.
Use it in place where you don't want a line break. Like between a title and a name: "Dr.~Smith".
I'm not sure what it's significance is in math mode.
 
as I cosmologist, I take offense to that statement. We are not opposed to accepting new ideas. You are simply number 2158 of the people that have approached me with a new, better theory that explains everything in the universe. I am now serving number 112. I will get to your theory when I have exhausted or disproven the ones who got here first. If you could show me some credentials that merit it (like a degree in cosmology), I will certainly move you to the front of the list. But if you can't, then I have to treat your theory like the other 2045 waiting on the list — Jimdalf the Grey 20 secs ago
^ I'm proud of that one
 
@JimdalftheGrey ::snorfle:: Nice. Or rather, "nicely done" because it's not really that nice.
 
It's not nice, but neither is him saying that cosmologists are close-minded and arrogant
we simply deal with many more "revolutionary" theories brought to us
 
@JimdalftheGrey To be fair, don't most people think that all scientists are close-minded and arrogant?
 
probably
 
3:55 PM
So cosmologists, being scientists, are just a subset he's picking on
 
In fact many scientists are close minded, just like many non-scientists. It's the process that makes science special, not necessarily the people. And yeah, he's being a twit.
 
@KyleKanos Yes, but nobody picks on Jim without getting a hot blast of snark shot back in their face
 
@JimdalftheGrey That is reasonable.
 
@JimdalftheGrey What statement? String Theorists seem opposed to accepting new ideas for the last 30 years.... (not saying you are one of them....)
 
@dmckee Hmmm... I was aware of the text mode usage. I encountered it in the document that I'm currently editing. Oh well, I ended up removing it and saw no change ;)
 
3:59 PM
@Jiminion bah, string theorists
love to stay and chat, but I'm due at the picket lines today. Ciao
 
Serious?
 
Pics or it didn't happen ;)
 
@Jiminion The problem with string theory right now is that the end of the process where ideas are put to the ultimate test is flapping around loose. There is no mechanism for forcing the field to confront any problems that they might have.
 
@KyleKanos And let you see my face? Yeah, right
 
4:01 PM
@JimdalftheGrey You could take pictures of other people, not just you, you know
 
Who is this "other people"?
 
Other picketers
 
Perhaps is face is particularly memorable...
 
There are other people out there!?
 
... and of course I mean more comely than us mere, flawed mortals.
 
4:02 PM
Yes, you solipsist
:D
 
@KyleKanos Good point: Just today I was reading Snow's speech on 'The Two Cultures' where he voices exactly the same opinions (not his own, but he is paraphrasing colleagues from the 'humanities culture')
 
Wish I could stay, but picketing=money
 
@JimdalftheGrey wut, really?
 
yes
that's why I voted for the strike
 
@dmckee I really like the idea that I heard Witten express in an interview once: Maybe string theory will turn out to be a new branch of geometry.
 
4:04 PM
I'm off
 
Loving it
Have fun!
 
Does anyone know of a truly awful looking 1D plot?
Characteristics I'm looking for: too many data sources, bad color choices, too busy (many lines)
 
Lol, 'One Direction' is dominating the results
 
Yes
That was the hard part
 
Can't you make one yourself?
 
4:06 PM
I'd rather draw from published works, but I could make one I guess
Error bars would be nice in there too
I found a really good one but can't use it because the guy who made it is going to be in the audience and I don't really want to insult him
 
LOL
share it!
 
Holy shit, dat legend
 
Yeah
 
all the similar-looking symbols
 
4:10 PM
That's the big eye catcher
The symbols are reused, though filled vs not-filled
But your error bars make it hard to discern
 
Really bad
 
Yep
It'd be a good one to use, but I can't :(
 
@dmckee The Theory of Anything....
 
@KyleKanos I'm sure Tufte rips several apart.
 
BTW -- Question with net scores lower than -3 no longer show up on physics.stackexchange.com, so that is one way to get them to disappear without needing to muster a crowd or a moderator for deletion.
3
I believe that those with scores lower than -8 don't even show up on physics.stackexchange.com/questions
 
4:58 PM
@Danu It, uh, depends, but in general, it'll be the set of morphisms, yes.
 
5:19 PM
@ACuriousMind True/False: If kinetic energy in a collision is conserved, then momentum must be conserved.
No one got that right. Typo?
I put true.
 
@0celo7 False, I believe. Kinetic energy can be "accidentally" conserved while momentum is not.
 
How can momentum not be conserved?
External potential?
Is kinetic energy conserved then?
 
Oh, I see, inelastic collisions aren't enough for that
Hm
 
Momentum is conserved only when no external forces act on it
 
I think "in a collision" is a bit stupid wording
Because the cause for momentum-non-conservation will be external to the particles colliding
 
5:24 PM
@ACuriousMind Psych test now. Will continue later.
 
@0celo7 Well, good luck! You could have to wait for any answer from me, though, real life is a bit busier than usual currently^^
 
Does anyone fancy deleting:
-4
Q: What happen when particles collide in accelarators?

The smart guyIN ACCELARATORS LIKE THE LHC [LARGE HADRON COLLIDER] AT CERN, MINISCULE PARTICLES ARE MADE TO COLLIDE AT EXTREMELY HIGH SPEEDS. WHAT HAPPEN TO THOSE PROTONS ?

It looks like a piss take to me. Especially since it originally referred to the "hardon collider".
 
I don't see a delete button...has the question to be old for normal users to cast delete votes?
 
Ah, you might need 20K rep to see the delete option. I can't remember whether it's 10K or 20K. Odd though, since you've undeleted questions before ...
 
@JohnRennie Well, that guy has posted several very bad questions (we also had this case). I'm not sure if they are trolling or just very...confused about what this site's supposed tobe
@JohnRennie Usually, I can cast delete votes on questions, I think you need 20k for answers.
Ah, 20k priviledge: "Voting to delete questions with a score of -3 or lower immediately after they are closed"
While the 10k priviledge is restricted as: "You must wait for a question to be closed for 2 days before you can vote for deletion."
 
5:31 PM
@ACuriousMind Ah. We'll have to wait a bit then :-)
 
So, if you find two 20k users willing to delete it, you could do it now
 
^ What he said
 
Oh well, it's been downvoted enough to disappear from the default view.
 
@JohnRennie Incidently, the OP is the same guy that asked about tachyons in that now-infamous question from last week
 
@Sean Linked that question already under "this case" in my first reply (to save you from searching for the link :) )
 
5:42 PM
@Sean I didn't think the tachyon question was that bad. It's not an area I'm very interested in so I haven't looked into it, but I've glanced through proofs that tachyonic fields actully propagate at subluminal speeds.
And I think Leandro and Qmechanic posted very interesting answers.
So even though the question may reflect some ignorance on the part of the OP it ended up being a worthwhile addition to the site.
 
I thought the answers to that question were great. I though the question after undergoing extensive edits was intriguing. But the question as the OP wrote it left a lot to be desired
 
But the latest question looks like it was typed after consuming a bottle of whiskey (or perhaps meths :-)
 
Fair point. But we're not likely to learn as much about "large hardon [sic] colliders"
I know can't help but imagining what a "hardon" collider would even look like...
 
@Sean I'm not typing that into a search engine.
 
@ACuriousMind Neither am I!
 
5:54 PM
@0celo7 Well momentum must always be conserved during a collision but that doesn't seem like what the question was asking for. The answer could be "no" as the teacher intended it (which is a different thing than being correct physics!) with their reasoning being: "To solve for the motion of a collision you need two equations: Momentum conservation and energy conservation in an elastic collision, or momentum conservation and that the particles have the same velocity in an inelastic collision."
"take away momentum conservation and only assume energy conservation, and you can't tell anything about the momentum."
 
@Sean: BTW, Nikolai commenting on annav's answer now leads me to believe that he has not been hacked. As little as I agree with this "diversity is not a rational goal in itself" argument against encouraging diversity, it is very common in Germany/Austria. It is plausible that his comments are genuine.
 
momentum IS always conserved in collision, but that could be the teacher's reasoning.
I'd have put "yes" too, but for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with energy.
 
6:09 PM
@Danu: I think I found one I can use:
It's actually mostly the same data as the other one, but with slightly different problems
 
6:48 PM
@NeuroFuzzy that's what I'm thinking. The answer is true if one thinks collision -> momentum conservation, but is false if one thinks energy conservation -> momentum conservation. The question is quite poorly worded. It's a shame "Mrs. Princeton grad former IBM exec" would never admit she worded a question poorly.
 
6:59 PM
@JamalS does that mean for QCD the F means something different? The example you gave for Maxwell signified it would be the Faraday tensor correct?
@Sean @ACuriousMind hardon collider lmfao. Where physicists go to see what comes out?
 
7:20 PM
@StanShunpike And it's the biggest one in the world
I'd say these jokes are low hanging fruit.
 
@KyleKanos Those are some really crazy plots
Have you ever looked at the books of Edward Tufte? You might be able to find his books in the library if you aren't inclined to buy them (I don't know I'd recommend buying them, I only went through them once -- good, but not worth picking up many more times): amazon.com/s/…
 
alarge mentioned Tufte earlier
 
His books usually have some monstrous examples in them
You can also look for examples (with code to fix it) on:
 
@tpg2114 I re-read my copies of Tufte about every 5 years. Partly for the refresher but also partly because they are just plain good reads.
Still, if you can find them in the library there is no need to own them.
 
@dmckee I've been meaning to go back through them. I only have 2 of his books, they seemed repetitive when you own more than 1.
 
7:31 PM
Everyone should see the chart of the Napoleon Campaign.
 
I only have VDoQI and Beautiful Evidence, and I agree that I feel no pressure to own more of them.
 
I have VdoQI and Envisioning Information. Maybe we should start a Tufte book club and trade -- I'm sure most people have a different 2nd book. Hah
I liked the train time tables:
 
I'm also glad that the Moreland paper you guys mentioned/linked the other day had the RGB values
Plus Brewer's website as well
I managed to add those into VisIt (including one as my default)
 
@KyleKanos My friend just added all of the matplotlib/paraview colormaps into Fieldview this week at his job
 
7:43 PM
@tpg2114 I need an engineer's perspective. From last week's physics test: True/False If kinetic energy is conserved in a collision, then momentum must be conserved.
I put true, because momentum is always conserved in collisions.
The answer key says "false". I need confirmation before I challenge my teacher.
 
@0celo7 I would say True because if KE is conserved, you know none of the energy went into things like sound, heat, friction, etc
 
@tpg2114 Is momentum always conserved in collisions?
 
If you include a big enough system (as in the entire universe) sure. But if you hit two pool balls together on a pool table, obviously the two-ball system does not have momentum conserved
 
@NeuroFuzzy lmao
 
Some of it is lost to sound, to friction, etc. Which are just increasing the momentum of air molecules, the molecules in the felt... So if those are part of your system then "yes"
But just the two-balls, no. There is a momentum sink due to friction
 
7:47 PM
@tpg2114 Some of momentum is lost? You mean energy is lost, right?
 
So you can't make the blanket statement. It depends on your system. However, if KE stays conserved for your system then momentum has to as well
 
@tpg2114 Momentum is only not conserved if we have a position-dependent external potential. (Noether's theorem.)
 
@0celo7 In an isolated system
 
@tpg2114 I believe having an external potential constitutes non-isolated.
 
F = dp/dt. If you are looking at a baseball moving through the air without gravity, the only force is air drag and so clearly dp/dt /= 0 -- it is losing momentum. So in the "baseball only" system, momentum is not conserved. It's being transferred to the air and out of the system
 
7:50 PM
@tpg2114 The question clearly mentions a collision.
A baseball going through the air is not a collision, unless we view it as a statistical system.
 
@0celo7 And I clearly answered your question. I'm giving you more examples. If you have two bodies in an isolated system that collide and kinetic energy is conserved -- momentum must also be conserved.
 
@tpg2114 So we agree? In an isolated, colliding system, momentum is always conserved?
 
If kinetic energy was not conserved, the collision was inelastic and momentum was lost to other things -- sound, plastic deformation, etc
 
@tpg2114 Inelastic collisions conserve momentum.
 
@0celo7 So if I throw a clay ball at the wall and it sticks to it, momentum was conserved?
 
7:53 PM
@tpg2114 Ah, the motion of the wall is too small to notice.
Kinetic energy is not conserved, however.
 
@0celo7 True - I guess I need to be more precise in how I set up the systems.
 
@tpg2114 That example highlights the need to consider closed systems. The ball + the wall is not closed, but the Earth as a whole is.
 
@0celo7 Yes. So we're back at -- if you have a closed system, momentum is always conserved. Which is why the question answer is probably marked as "false" by the way
The question is probably trying to get you to say that kinetic energy conservation is required for momentum conservation
So if it said "If and only if kinetic energy is conserved, momentum is conserved" is probably what the teacher intended
 
@tpg2114 I think you're right there. The wording is then very poor.
It clearly says in a collision.
 
But one could argue that the question "If the sun is shining, momentum is conserved in a collision" is true. Because momentum is always conserved. So the sun shining is a sufficient condition but not a necessary one
Turns out the sun not shining is also sufficient.
 
7:58 PM
1
Q: How can I use Einstein's field equations to find the metric tensor?

Misc.nerdinessI have watched and read a lot on the topic of General Relativity and the geometry behind it. I am confident that I can derive an approximation of the the stress-energy-momentum tensor with just the metric tensor, but if I was given the stress-energy-momentum tensor I'm not sure how I would go bac...

::sigh::
@tpg2114 Do you agree that the question is poorly worded?
 
@0celo7 I do, but I personally wouldn't fight with it unless it was like make-or-break on my grade or something
The problem is that it really should have said "if and only if" rather than "If"
 
@0celo7 It might be a tad too broad. Though I guess, ultimately, the answer would be: solve a whole bunch of PDEs
 
Otherwise it's true regardless of the first conditional
 
@KyleKanos It's both broad and shows a lack of research.
 
0
Q: why do scientist need to invent light years?

marcus scottwhy do scientists need to invent light years? Whats so important of having a light year? i have been learning that a light year is 9.460528*10^15. My question is, why are light years so important for other people to know. what do scientist use these methods for.

Wow.
 
8:02 PM
Primarily opinion based
 
@KyleKanos That's a creative way to put "dumb question".
 
curious...we don't have a tag for ...I could have sworn we did
 
Totally random question -- do countries that use metric sell meter sticks?
 
@tpg2114 Meter stick as in stick with meter markings?
 
Basically every store in the US sells yard sticks. But I don't think I've ever heard of a meter stick
@0celo7 Yeah, just a 1m long ruler like we have yard sticks
 
8:07 PM
@tpg2114 We have (2-) meter sticks in our Physics lab.
 
I want to say our yard sticks actually have meters on them now too. But it's such a ridiculously common thing in the US. Anybody knows what a yard stick is, they are sold pretty much anywhere
I wonder if it's true in metric-based countries, only with a meter stick. So outside of the scientific people who might be inclined to have one
 
@tpg2114 Builders?
 
Maybe I need to be more precise -- could I stop a random person on the street in a random city in a random (developed) country that uses the metric system and would a "meter stick" be something that is familiar. Like a yard stick would be for people in the US
 
I have meter sticks in my physics labs
 
@tpg2114 Germans have meter sticks. However, they tend to be fold up-style and are much longer than 1 meter.
 
8:11 PM
@0celo7 More like a tape measure?
 
Ein Meterstab oder Gliedermaßstab, auch Zollstock (von mittelhochdeutsch zol für ‚abgeschnittenes Stück Holz‘), Maßstab, genauer Gliedergelenkstabmaß, umgangssprachlich auch als Meter(-maß) bezeichnet, ist ein Messgerät zur Bestimmung von Längen bis zu drei Metern, wobei die übliche Gesamtlänge zwei Meter ist (oft als „Doppelmeter“). Das Wort Metermaß bezeichnet neben dem Meterstab auch andere einfache Messgeräte, wie das Bandmaß (meist 1,5 Meter) für Textilien oder das Bandmaß, auch als Rollmeter bezeichnet. In Teilen von Sachsen wird der Meterstab auch „Schmiege“ genannt. == Beschaffenheit… ==
Like in that pic.
I probably have one around here, from when I lived in Germany.
 
Ah, okay
 
8:27 PM
@0celo7 There should be a tax on German words longer than 10 letters.
 
@Jiminion Quantenfeldtheorie just sounds silly.
Technical German in general is really long and silly.
 
Seinfeldtheorie = Nothing Happens!
2
 
8:41 PM
@tpg2114 Re: "So you can't make the blanket statement. It depends on your system. However, if KE stays conserved for your system then momentum has to as well" I was imagining something where an explosion between the pool table and billiard ball could do weird things. Which could be the case if you allow ANY kind of interaction
@tpg2114 Well whatever I'm probably just being argumentative
There's a lot more words I could spend but it's just a collision...
 
@KyleKanos sick :)
 
I really like the problem in Goldstein ch 1 or 2 where you're asked to adapt the Euler-Lagrange equations to impulses. I've used that quite a few times.
 
Just wondering has anyone had any experience using OpenFOAM for comp fluid dynamics?
 
9:07 PM
@Chris2807 I've dinked with it a tiny bit.
 
@Jiminion Have you used any good resources for it above and beyond the tutorials on the website etc etc?
 
@Chris2807 Not really. It's a tough beast to use, but a) It's free and b) I don't think commercial systems would be all that easier to use. Start with a ridiculously simple version of what you are doing and add to it over time.
 
@Jiminion yeah it seems to be really badly documented but it is very difficult to argue with free beer
 
@Chris2807 Look at the sample plots and models. They are probably the best "documentation".
 
@Jiminion thanks will do
 
9:23 PM
I tried OpenFOAM once
I like the trial version of COMSOL better than it
But I've not really used either
 
Completely unrelated: I've recently discovered that Wikipedia can actually export directly to PDF
Into actually nice looking formats too
 
@KyleKanos whoa, really?
 
Left column, under the heading "Print/Export" is the option "Download as PDF"
 
very, very nice
 
I'm wondering about the "Create a Book" option now
 
9:53 PM
@ACuriousMind that question I asked may have been to vague... :/
 
user54412
10:05 PM
@Danu I'm confused by this. How are paragraphs coming out wrong?
 
user54412
I know everyone in my department manages to do that, but that's because they all (mis)use plain tex
 
user54412
But paragraphs really should just work
 
10:22 PM
@ChrisWhite If you leave a white line after your equation in the .tex file
it will indent the next piece of text, which is ugly
 
@Danu /noindent
It's meant to do that.
You can macro an enter and \noindent for equations if you want.
 
I don't think that's very elegant. I'd rather comment my white lines
But the problem is that the document has already been produced: There are 83 pages of stuff that suffers from these problems and I need to come up with some way to deal with it :P
I'd rather try to do something in the preamble
 
What do you mean by "comment my white lines"?
You want to put comments in the whitespace?
 
That's what @alarge suggested, and I've done it before.
just like this:
\end{equation}
%
this
That will prevent wrong indentation, yet preserves clarity in the .tex file
 
@Danu Why not:
\end{equation}
%
\n this
Define \n to be \noindent
That's too cumbersome?
 
10:31 PM
That's just superfluous: I need either % or \noindent
but either way I think that's too much work and am therefore looking at a way to correct this in the preamble
 
user54412
Wait, if you don't want a paragraph break, why is there a blank line?
 
user54412
Whitespace is meaningful in tex, and blank lines are code for paragraph breaks
 
@ChrisWhite You're right. Doing
\end{equation}
%
text
Leaves no indent, at least on my distro.
 
user54412
@0celo7 Yeah, because there's no blank line there
 
@ChrisWhite To preserve clarity in the .tex file. This is why I'd usually use the %
 
10:41 PM
@ChrisWhite Exactly. Derp. @Danu what's up with your Tex?
 
There is nothing wrong with my tex, you're just not understanding me lol
 
user54412
@Danu Your source is made more clear by the code paragraphs not matching the output paragraphs?
 
I already said that \end{equation}
%
text
is a possible solution
@ChrisWhite I find it unacceptable to have text on the line right below \end{equation}, if that's what you're asking then yes.
I also find that this is highly standard --- at least among the people I've talked to about this.
 
@Danu Can't you do a "find all and replace" for \end{equation} and put %?
 
user54412
Also, the advice about \noindent can go awry depending on your settings. It will avoid imposing a horizontal \parindent, but it will do nothing about the vertical \parskip
 
10:44 PM
Nah, I don't think that'll cover all of it. Plus I'm very wary of using such global commands without actually seeing what it will be doing. Remember, the document is not mine
 
user54412
@Danu That's just... awful. I'm sorry :P
 
@ChrisWhite Good point. Another reason not to use it
@ChrisWhite Really?
I think it's a pretty obvious choice, considering that there's white space around the equation too. So why not in the .tex file?
 
@Danu You any good at symmetry factors of Feynman diagrams?
 
user54412
The equation is part of the paragraph. It already has its own lines
 
@ChrisWhite mmm :P
 
user54412
10:46 PM
that's a pretty presumptuous equation to demand to be set off with blank lines too :)
 
@ChrisWhite My equations carry weight ;)
 
00:00 - 23:0023:00 - 00:00

« first day (1580 days earlier)      last day (3339 days later) »