« first day (1374 days earlier)      last day (3352 days later) » 

YeZ
12:04 AM
@Shokhet this is for you. (I posted an answer from the material that was relevant to a chabura I'm working on. You can do the full answer)
 
@YeZ I saw that, and voted on it already....I actually dropped in to yell at you, for not asking a question for me to answer :P
@YeZ I have to be somewhere five minutes ago, so I'll see if I can post an answer later ;-)
 
12:40 AM
1
Q: Does Purim-Torah need to be otherwise on topic?

YeZNothing in the Purim Torah guidelines mentions that they need to be otherwise on topic. This could either be because it is obvious that it needs to be on topic, or because it doesn't actually need to be on topic. For example, this question squirmed its way in to being about Judaism using the ol...

 
 
1 hour later…
1:52 AM
@Meta-Man @YeZ The question you linked to in that question seemed to be okay....
 
2:24 AM
@msh210 @Scimonster I don't know how screen-readers work, really, but I do know that code formatting should be avoided when not needed. I have no idea what that means for smileys, though 8-/
 
 
2 hours later…
YeZ
4:25 AM
@Shokhet Right - the question was if it had not made the connection to nedarim.
 
4:52 AM
@YeZ Okay; got it.
I'm chuckling seeing a "chat" between a "Shochet" and a "Frankfurt"-er :-) — DanF 51 mins ago
cc @NoachmiFrankfurt
gotta go; TZT!
 
5:05 AM
sholom 3aleicham wara7amei Aloheem ubeerchotho brothers n sisters
for anyone interested in an email i sent to my 7avrutho about what koreyya3 is and so on during tafillo: pastebin.com/q1riFJrJ
interesting read
if anyone has comments on it please dont be afraid to let me know anything
 
 
2 hours later…
6:40 AM
It would have been so much better if @Shokhet had asked and answered this! — Cnsersmoit 32 secs ago
 
 
5 hours later…
11:42 AM
0
Q: Alternatives to Mi.Yodeya? @MonicaCellio

SAHI realize the irony of posting this question here. But indeed I am posting it as both a serious question and a public service message, as it were. I have been helped very, very much by posters on this this site for several years now, and have learned a tremendous amount about Judaism as a resul...

 
 
2 hours later…
2:10 PM
@Shokhet @fred @YeZ @ShmuelBrin @Cnsersmoit
Why did you vote to close as duplicate
Where in the other question does it being a source saying they can not live together as long as they do not have relations with each other?
 
 
1 hour later…
3:12 PM
@Meta-Man kind of related (but tangential enough that I'm not linking it there): communitybuilding.stackexchange.com/q/990/83
 
@MonicaCellio Thanks. Have you detected misogynist attacks on yourself or other female users on MY? I don't think I've seen that, though I have seen other prejudice-related attacks on users (infrequently), including on you.
@MonicaCellio From the top answer:
> All of this seems to indicate that men don't purposefully gang up on women (as the user you spoke to suggested), but that they tend toward more aggressive behavior that women generally find discouraging.
"Men are from Mars; women are from Venus." I'll buy that, and that this could be an issue here.
... which we're working on
 
YeZ
@Yehuda Your suggesting the difference is because in your question you explicitly asked for a source?
I assume in the other question's "Can divorce be avoided" is implicit that they want sources for that, as opposed to people's opinions.
 
@IsaacMoses I have not detected misogyny here. (Granted, I didn't detect it on that other site either, if it was in fact happening.) I have seen other prejudice-related rudeness here on several people, as you note, so that gives me hope that I would be more likely to notice gender-related problems.
@IsaacMoses I have seen this in US culture in general. I have certainly seen it in the software world in which I work, where the successful women are those who learn to "be guys" in terms of interaction style.
@IsaacMoses agreed -- we're working on the general issue, it's been an issue for a while, we need to keep paying attention to it.
 
3:30 PM
@MonicaCellio When my now-wife and I got engaged, my grandmother gave us a copy of You Just Don't Understand by Deborah Tannen. I found its insights about communication styles to be quite useful.
 
YeZ
@IsaacMoses I don't know how this demographic newfangled hoojamathingy works, but I have some observations about it.
for example, we have 64 users under 18, and only 56 users with no college.
I'm just looking at the totals and realizing the two categories are using different total populations. I guess less people provided their education level info.
 
@YeZ I think those are some sort of "index," not counts
 
I think the differences in communication styles are sometimes described as more black-and-white than they are. I hope any serious treatment of the subject works with that. "Women do X" or "men do Y" is too simplistic and oft-wrong (as generalizations tend to be).
Anyway, interesting topic with a lot of nuance to it, but there are differences in how people are taught and what they're exposed to and stuff.
 
@MonicaCellio True. Everyone's on a spectrum. However, statements like "Behaviors like X come off to many people, especially women, as rude," are useful. Also, "While you might consider behavior Y rude, many people, especially women, consider it essential to nice conversation."
@MonicaCellio Thanks
 
3:46 PM
@IsaacMoses yes, agreed. Trends or tendencies are important to be aware of. Ascribing them to any particular individual leads to trouble.
 
@MonicaCellio Yup. The latter is what prejudice is.
 
(I should perhaps disclose that when I took the MBTI years ago (required by an employer, ugh), I pegged the "T" end of the "thinking/feeling" spectrum. So I already know that as a female INTJ I'm a bit of a freak. :-)
 
4:02 PM
Any objections to my editing out the last two paragraphs of this and editing the title to match the bulk of the body?
 
4:44 PM
... done
 
5:11 PM
@IsaacMoses thanks.
 

« first day (1374 days earlier)      last day (3352 days later) »