« first day (1229 days earlier)      last day (3679 days later) » 

4:00 AM
@Cerberus That is to be certain.
We perform more expensive testing
 
So perhaps some people here waste more physicians' time, but there are savings elsewhere.
 
No question that is true.
 
Well, I think the same procedure is also often more expensive in your country?
 
Our system is rife with waste.
@Cerberus That depends upon how you measure it.
 
Something to do with various organisations determining prices in strange ways and such.
 
4:01 AM
@Cerberus Yes.
If you measure the real cost vs. the amount paid vs. the ... I just got a headache.
 
I mean something as simple as a bag of saline, I think that was like € 50 or so in some hospitals?
Aww.
 
Yes
It's not that the bag costs so much. It's the amount we have to charge to remain profitable.
 
Are you suffering from medical-cost-related migraine?
 
For every bag that gets paid for, there are 4 that don't. Indigent care, etc.
 
Right...
 
4:03 AM
@Cerberus More of a look at the stygian mess that the whole thing is.
 
But why are your costs so high?
I read an article about that: it had something to do with large organisations that had to negotiate prices or something.
@DavidM Right, right.
 
@Cerberus Malpractice insurance, bureaucracy, etc.
 
But we have all that too...
 
@Cerberus That is a part of it, too.
 
The article mentioned certain secret negotiations (against competitors) and stuff.
Here, hospitals and insurance companies are also trying to keep rates a secret.
 
4:05 AM
Was this the article by Steven Brill in Time Magazine?
 
Or maybe cost prices. Or what insurance pays to the hospital.
I honestly don't remember. But it was very long.
 
There was a piece of shit written in Time a few years back. The guy was about 20% accurate. The rest was all spin and misrepresentation.
 
I see an article from 2013. But I can't access it.
 
@Cerberus I'm not certain if that's it. No big loss.
 
This refers to a long story by Brill in Time.
OK.
 
4:10 AM
Yes. It is referring to the article.
And, this post is actually far more sensible than the original.
Brill made it sound like hospitals were money making machines that were sitting on coffers of money.
 
Heh.
I think I must have read that article a while ago.
 
I've said for years that I want to write a book.
 
I'm sure a lot of money goes to companies that hospitals buy stuff from?
Oh! You should!
 
I will call it "Perfect Every Time: The Unreasonable Stress of Being a Doctor"
 
Haha.
 
4:12 AM
@Cerberus Bingo
 
I'm sure it will be an instant hit.
 
@Cerberus I would be assassinated by the American Medical Association before it got published.
:)
 
One thing to consider is compulsory licensing for medical patents (or all patents).
@DavidM You can pass on the manuscript to me anonymously!
 
The trouble is this: R&D costs in the US are ridiculous.
 
But still a smallish part of total expenditure for big pharma.
Is what I read.
 
4:14 AM
The Food and Drug Admin will often take 10 years to approve something that has been used in the EU.
 
Maybe 15 %.
I don't believe the EU is very fast either?
 
EU approves faster than we do.
And, before something gets approved, it can be studied more easily
 
Here, many things get approved nationally, not sure what the role of the EU is.
 
I meant nations in the EU, not the governing body itself.
 
Ah OK.
 
4:16 AM
Sorry
 
(The EU also has some medical approval thing, not sure how it works.)
 
It was faster than typing Europe
 
Heh.
Either way, even American pharmaceuticals don't spend as much on R&D as they would have you believe, or so I have read.
 
Quite frankly, if the US wants to pay for healthcare all it has to do is legalize marijuana, and tax the shit out of tobacco.
@Cerberus True, individually, no.
But, for every successful drug, there are 20 failed ones
And, being for-profit companies . . .
 
@DavidM Yeah, that would be nice.
 
4:19 AM
Somewhere along the line, people got the notion that everyone was entitled to live forever.
I don't know when or where it happened.
We spend a fortune on end of life care.
 
This is the article that I read. It may be a bit biased.
 
People who smoke, drink, and are morbidly obese for years spending their lives ignoring the advice of doctors ... But, the minute they are dying, we put them in an ICU and spend billions trying to save them,
 
Yeah, well, to some extent that is the humane thing to do.
 
@Cerberus It is. Because there is a fundamental bias that it is evil to profit.
@Cerberus Not at the expense of other people's care.
 
Well, evil...
 
4:21 AM
Futile care is not humane.
 
The state should not be about good and evil, but about what works.
 
Comfort care is humane
@Cerberus Agreed.
I'm actually a proponent of socialized medicine plus in the US.
 
If too much money goes from the public to pharmaceutical companies, the state should perhaps reconsider the monopolies it grants them.
@DavidM Plus?
 
Give everyone basic coverage and catastrophic care. But, if you want your less emergent stuff now, you have to pay.
 
By emergent you mean urgent?
 
4:23 AM
For example: seeing your physician for physicals, care of diseases, etc. covered 100%.
Yes emergent = urgent.
 
OK.
 
Medicine stratifies: Elective --> Urgent --> Emergent --> Life-threatening
 
Ah, jargon.
 
Yes, sorry.
 
I would normally read emergent as emerging.
But it makes sense.
 
4:25 AM
It's reflex for me
So for example: You have diabetes, no cost to you for treatment.
 
But what to do with something like...a girl who is suffering from back pain because her breasts are too large? My friend had that. It was not super serious, nor urgent.
 
You need a knee-replacement ... Wait on the waiting list. Or get a supplementary insurance that allows you to pick a surgeon and time.
@Cerberus She would be treated for free, but she might have to wait her turn.
 
Why does there have to be a turn?
I mean, waiting lists can be reduced for everyone.
 
Most socialized systems involve some form of rationing.
 
In what way?
 
4:27 AM
You have x amount of available resources.
You have y people.
You have to ration.
 
For certain procedures, I think there is a shortage of specialists, so you may have to wait longer. But for most things, we managed to get rid of the longer waiting lists we had a decade or two ago.
 
Of course.
But, the incentive to be a specialist runs thin when the compensation doesn't match.
If they cut my salary, I won't work the way I do now.
 
I think reducing waiting lists for everyone is not that expensive compared to the other factors that drive up costs?
 
Americans tend to have zero-tolerance for waiting lists.
We want it done yesterday.
 
Heh.
 
4:29 AM
So, I say: if you want it done yesterday, pay.
If you can wait, it's free.
 
I have no idea how long you'd have to wait for, say, a non-urgent knee operation. It could be next week, it could be months.
 
Right.
 
I would expect it to be...maybe one or three weeks.
 
Americans have more available health care but poorer access if that makes sense.
 
Right.
The article by Brill also mentioned that you had more elective procedures, of which a large proportion was unnecessary, or something.
 
4:31 AM
The problem is this: You mention the word socialized, and people trot out the concept of waiting lists, etc.
@Cerberus That was part of his being full of shit.
 
Ah.
 
We don't specialize in sham operations.
 
So people can't demand another MRI even if the doctor has told them that it would be no use?
 
Yes, they can.
And, they will get it.
 
Right.
So that costs money.
 
4:33 AM
But, it's not the physician's fault as Brill was asserting.
 
By the way, suppose I needed a non-urgent knee operation in your city, and I called the hospital to make an appointment; how long do you imagine I would have to wait?
 
It's the fault of the expectations of the consumer. And, the fact that should you be wrong, the patient can sue you with impunity.
@Cerberus It depends upon the surgeon.
Some will have you in surgery that afternoon.
 
Oh, I don't remember his saying that doctors were to blame: I rather read it as that doctors were sort of obligated to comply if the insured patient wanted something. Maybe the claim-culture thing had something to do with that.
 
Then some have backlogs of weeks or months.
 
Ah OK.
The same day, I would not expect that to happen here.
 
4:36 AM
@Cerberus He tried to make it sound like we were pulling people off the streets, and offering them MRIs and other unnecessary procedures.
 
Haha.
 
@Cerberus It would be unusual here, too. Probably next week, though.
 
Ah OK.
 
More logistics, though.
Patient has to be fasting, etc.
Meanwhile, to see a primary care physician can take months . . . They're way over booked.
And, under paid.
 
Oh.
Hmm that's odd.
 
4:38 AM
Yup
 
You can't call your GP to make an appointment the same day?
 
It's the specialist heavy nature of American medicine.
 
Right, that makes sense.
 
A sick visit, perhaps. A physical, not typically.
 
Here is a waiting list for an hospital:
> Specialisme Wachttijd in weken
Allergologie
a. allergie/hyperactiviteit luchtwegen (KNO)
b. allergische huidaandoeningen (Derma) 2
c. allergische aandoeningen (Kind)
d. astma (Longgeneeskunde) 1
Cardiologie 1
Chirurgie algemeen 1
a. Vaatchirurgie 1
b. Gastro-enterologie 1
c. Mammapoli 2 dagen
d. Oncologie 2 dagen
e. Traumatologie 1
f. Single visit Liesbreuk 1
Dermatologie 2
a. OSS 3
Gynaecologie algemeen 4
Interne geneeskunde algemeen 1
a. Endocrinologie 4
b. Nefrologie 4
d. Infectieziekten 1
 
4:39 AM
(I can get an appointment anytime I please ...)
 
Waiting time in weeks (except where it says "dagen").
 
Makes sense.
The problem is that socialized medicine assumes that all doctors are equal
 
So nephrology could be 4 weeks.
@DavidM How do you mean?
 
And you could be dead by then.
 
Heh, we're only talking about non-urgent here.
 
4:40 AM
@Cerberus Skills vary amongst doctors.
 
@tchrist If it's urgent, you can go immediately, of course.
@DavidM Naturally.
 
@Cerberus Of course.
Well, what if I want to see a particular expert. Most socialized systems lock you in by geography or other methods of organization.
 
People who need to see a nephrologist have serious issues.
 
@tchrist Typically yes.
 
@DavidM How does that work? You can pick your doctor here.
Most people probably don't, they pick a nearby hospital.
 
4:42 AM
@Cerberus Can you travel to another city?
 
@DavidM “Socialized”?
 
@DavidM How do you mean can?
 
@Cerberus Are you allowed to leave your local system in search of someone who you prefer? Or does it require a special referral.
@tchrist Socialized medicine
 
There are no local systems.
You can go anywhere.
 
@DavidM I don’t know what that means.
 
4:44 AM
@Cerberus OK, I'm not as familiar with the Dutch system.
 
Your operation even gets paid for if you want to go to Germany or Belgium. Maybe not always, but many people do it.
 
@tchrist State funded health care.
 
What a crappy spam detector.
 
@DavidM One thing, though: you normally need a referral from your GP to see any specialist.
Or you're not covered if the specialist thinks the visit was unnecessary.
 
4:45 AM
@Cerberus I know many systems like that. I do not belong to one, happily enough.
 
So, in practice, you just need the referral.
 
@tchrist Why was it tagged?
 
@DavidM I have no earthly idea. I see nothing spammy about it.
 
@tchrist Why happily? If you can't get a referral, that means you don't need a specialist, right?
 
@tchrist Me neither.
@Cerberus American mentality.
 
Haha.
 
@Cerberus We want it yesterday. We want what we want.
:-)
 
But anyway, going by what you told me, our average waiting lists are longer than yours.
One thing that I recently found out surprises me, though: isn't it extremely socialist how your parents can't pick any school they want in any school district?
 
@Cerberus I won't pretend to understand that one.
 
If you live near a good school in a different school district, your child cannot go to that school, right?
 
4:49 AM
There are conflicting notions of fairness and equality in the US.
 
I got the impression that it had something to do with school buses.
 
And, if they let people pick, the fear is that all the good students will go to one school, and the bad students the other. Creating an inequality.
 
Yes...
That certainly happens here.
 
No one realizes that making a mediocre standard for all schools accomplishes less.
 
Although one wonders whether it won't just happen within a district as well in your system?
 
4:50 AM
Better to identify the bad students and redirect them into things that will be better for them.
There is too much pressure for Americans to attend university.
 
Hmm.
 
Many people get degrees that don't serve them
 
Oh, we have that too.
Like "recreationology".
 
Rather, had they had proper training in the trades they eventually wound up in . . .
Worse: "Business"
 
Heh.
 
4:52 AM
Then they become secretaries
 
Hmm.
Not sure how successful those business degrees are here.
 
Had they been identified earlier in life as heading down this path, they could have received proper training.
And, save a fortune on schooling.
 
Quite so.
Right, non-socialised education.
 
Yup
 
It's complicated.
 
4:53 AM
It is
 
But hey, if you don't want me to visit you next time complaining about tiredness, I should go to bed hehe.
 
@tchrist Did you receive my email?
@Cerberus Hahahahahaha. Enjoy.
 
I have 7 hours!
 
@DavidM Let me go look.
 
G'bye.
 
4:55 AM
@tchrist Thanks
 
Hmm an e-mail...
 
@Cerberus Pleasure chatting with you.
 
Is it about something I should be curious about?
 
@Cerberus No, I just wanted his spammer detector.
 
@DavidM Mine!
Ahh OK.
 
4:55 AM
@Cerberus All things should you curious about be.
 
Where does it detect spammers?
 
@Cerberus On ELU
 
@tchrist But curious enough to act upon...
@DavidM Ah OK.
 
Found it.
 
So many wonder this world doth contain.
 
4:56 AM
@tchrist Cool
 
Good night!
 
@Cerberus Try not to wake due to apnea ;-)
 
@DavidM Treatable.
And he likely wouldn’t know if he did.
 
@DavidM Haha I'm coming out of a cold, so it's nose spray for me tonight.
I love the stuff.
 
@tchrist Absolutely. We had a long discussion about it earlier.
@Cerberus Good idea
 
4:57 AM
Trying not to get addicted.
 
@Cerberus That is the tricky part.
 
I think that’s overstated, but I’m not sure.
I use it when I need it.
 
Although I felt absolutely fine when I was addicted.
 
Which is not once a week.
 
Good.
So, David, you should still have 6 hours left of your night, right?
Plenty for you haha.
 
4:59 AM
I was directed to use it by a physician for a few days due to a sinus infection. I said but the label says not to do that or risk addiction. The physician didn’t seem to think it something to worry about. Plus he said, well, would you rather be gagging in your sleep?
 
Not to do what?
 
@tchrist It is overstated. Because it is not exactly life-altering if you become addicted. No 12-step program needed to kick it, etc.
 
Use it at all?
 
@Cerberus I'm off this week.
 
I also read that the addiction causes no permanent damage normally.
@DavidM Ahh good!
 
5:00 AM
@Cerberus Nose bleeds, that sort of thing.
 
Mail sent.
 
You don't really get high off it.
 
"Really"?
Not at all.
 
@DavidM Right, but, if so, that your body would eventually return to normal after not using it for a while.
 
The doctor gave me the idea that the warnings were not meant for people who needed it and were under a physician’s direct instructions.
 
5:01 AM
@tchrist True.
 
Yeah it's not about high, it is about...dependency.
 
@Cerberus Exactly.
= Physician
 
Hehe.
Oh, bodies, why are you imperfect?
Okay, now it's really bed time.
Adieu!
poof
 
@tchrist Thanks for the email. I will try to digest that.
 
It’s easy once you get used to it. The symptoms always cluster.
I too must away, being this hours and hours past my normal bedtime.
 
5:05 AM
@tchrist Yeah. I hate answering a question only to be informed it's a spammer troll.
Good night.
 
 
5 hours later…
10:34 AM
misstydning
 
10:57 AM
@Matt If you are bored you can check this out
 
Hi @Johan! What is a good translation for misstydning? I guessed mistranslation.
 
misunderstanding perhaps
I read it like you interpret the meaning of something wrongly
why so swedish?
Feltolkning is probably more commonly used
not 100% misstydning is a word, no problem understanding what it means but not sure I ever used it
 
oh, I was reading you link on the star board. I asked Google translate to have a go at translating it
it couldn't figure out misstydning
 
> Formen utan t har uppstått genom misstydning av gryt, som sannol. uppfattats som best
ah! misinterpreting.
 
 
1 hour later…
12:33 PM
Oh look a chat room! :
@Johan "not 100% misstydning is a word, no problem understanding what it means but not sure I ever used it"
I think you might be misinterpreting it...
 
@Ronan Oh, look! A Ronan.
Bienvenu.
@JohanLarsson Dutch vertolking. You think this could be related to English talk?
We do not having anything like talk in Dutch, except tolk "translator" and derivatives.
 
"A wild @Cerberus appears" Like a cross between Pokemon and Final Fantasy!
Not really sure what's going on, but I'll keep an eye out! :)
 
Hey!! I ain't no Pokémon!
I am neither small nor cute.
I'm fearsome and magnificent.
 
You obviously haven't levelled up enough to get the fierce and magnificent beasts!
 
12:59 PM
Cerberus tries sleep. It's not very effective.
2
 
Hey
I was just wondering what the person known as who ruins magician's trick?
 
@Cerberus tolk means translator and gauge
@Ronan :)
 
1:16 PM
@Mr_Green I don't think English has a word specific to that situation. If you're looking for a word for someone who ruins someone else's fun, you could call them a "spoil sport"
 
I remember that there is one word for those people.. had one english lesson in my school days.. maybe I am wrong.. thanks
the english lesson name was "magicians revenge"
can't control my curiosity to know.. so I asked here :)
 
fair enough :)
 
moin
 

« first day (1229 days earlier)      last day (3679 days later) »