« first day (2084 days earlier)      last day (2821 days later) » 

3:00 PM
'\\1' becomes '\1', the backslash is called as 'escaping' in this case, because backslash is already part of special characters (for \n, \t, ..). So when you want a backslash alone, you do \\
It allows also to insert quotes '\'' is valid and is ', it's like "'". And you can also use backticks, which is a more powerful feature to include variables more nicely
 
"\t" is a tab character, "\n" is a newline, "\0x20" is character with character code 20 in hex, aka 32 ASCII (UTF8) aka space character. Similarly, "\1" is character code 1 (aka SOH, a control char which is unprintable).
So if you want your string to include the two visible characters \ and 1 and not just the one non-printable character SOH, then you need to escape the backslash, using another backslash, as in "\\" which produces \ (just as "\t" produces tab), followed by "1" to produce "1", thus "\\1".
 
better explanation
 
Uh, I meant 32 ASCII. Can't seem to edit my comment.
 
3:21 PM
@caub But it's normally not necessary to escape \1 in Regex in Javascript, is it?
 
Slash-delimited patterns are compiled differently, IIRC.
So it depends how you are creating these.
The slashes appear to work as they do in Perl, granting a different interpretation of backslash escapes within their bounds.
@DanBron Actually, this is complicated. Something like /(foo)\1/ has the \1 as a backreference to the first capture group, not an octal escape like "\01" would be. In Perl it depends on whether it's in slashes or double quotes.
But really, it is more complex than this, since [\1\2] are always octals not backrefs.
 
3:37 PM
ugh, octals. Uglifying languages and introducing bugs since forever.
 
3:50 PM
@tchrist So does /(diplodocus)\1/g work as a Regex in Javascript?
I think it does?
 
@Cerberus yes
 
Notepad++ gives the entire string the proper purple colour.
OK.
Caub, formerly Crl, seemed to be suggesting that it needs to be escaped, so /(diplodocus)\\1/g
 
@tchrist Yeah, I was speaking only of string literals, not regex syntax. Using \1 in the LHS side of a s/// and $1 in the RHS bugged me for like two weeks in 1999 when I was learning Perl, but it stopped when I recognized regexen have a grammar separate from the grammar used in string interpolation.
 
If it were delimited by quotes not slashes, it would need the extra escaping.
But then you would need a separate argument for the /g as well. It's lame.
 
Right, my earlier comment should be interpreted under that constraint.
 
3:53 PM
@tchrist Oh, OK!
A separate argument to indicate that you want to carry out a global search?
 
@Cerberus Yeah.
 
OK I see.
 
@Cerberus yes, because it's outside the slashes, hence would be outside the string quotes
 
Oh, OK.
 
3:54 PM
I've never regexed in Javascript except in slashes.
 
@Cerberus In Perl6, these things are rationalized as "modifiers" or "adjectives" which semantically are named arguments to functions, but syntactically operate as postnomials /
 
@tchrist Ah OK.
@DanBron That makes sense, except the word "postnominal".
I'm not a programmer.
 
uh, suffix? but not attached?
instead of foo(1,2,global=true), you'd say foo(1,2) :global (I'm hand-waving but that's the idea)
so you get the convenience of the old /g but the rationality of function prototypes
 
user208178
@Cerberus Do you have anything in Dutch like the“f” word in English that people can use it to modify any word under the sun when they want to express anger, excitement, joy etc.?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Hm.. that does make sense. I'd rather cut off fours toes, than both my thumbs.
 
user208178
3:57 PM
I asked because I can’t think of a similar word in Urdu which can be used with like every other word. I don’t know about other languages. For example “fucking annoying” etc. in English. It is not like we don’t have swear words, but they are just not that compatible with other words.
 
@Mitch Nobody uses those toes anyway
 
@DanBron Okay, and what does (1,2) signify?
 
@Arrowfar You're not trying hard enough in Urdu
 
will. not. make. pun. about. Urd you too.
 
@Arrowfar We mostly use kut, "cunt". It can be attached to any word, or used separately.
 
3:58 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 thw two outer toes on each foot. the ring and pinkie toes.
 
user208178
@Mitch Lol I am. There isn't any. It is just interesting :D
 
user208178
@terdon Hello terdon. How are you?
 
Hi!
 
user208178
@Cerberus Ah that one. I see.
 
user208178
I think "cunt" is common in Australian English too.
 
4:00 PM
@Arrowfar Kut is not used in the exact same way as in English. It's either an exclamation, or a subject complement, or a prefix.
 
user208178
I hear they don't even find it offensive.
 
Then again, English doesn't have a word that works like kut.
Each language is unique.
 
user208178
yep
 
For example, you could say in Dutch:
> I dropped the bowl. Kut!!
Or:
 
@Cerberus The normal (positional) parameters to the function. Like function quotient(float dividend, float divisor, bool integral = false) { z = dividend / divisor; if not integral then return z else return round(z) end }.
 
4:01 PM
> I dropped the bowl. That is really kut!!
 
...unique in how it creates taboo words out of anatomy and digestion and animals
 
Or:
> Today really is a kutday.
 
Tuesday is like that
 
@Arrowfar dunno about Dutch but there are equivalent universal modifiers in Greek (κώλο-), Spanish (puto- or X de mierda, both are essentially the same in Catalan) and French (putain de) at least.
 
'puta de mierda'
 
4:01 PM
so you'd say quotient(22,7) and get 3.14... but if you said quotient(22,7) :integral you'd get 22 .
 
@Cerberus Shit?
 
@terdon But all of those are slightly different in their use, right?
@terdon Quite similar actually, yes.
 
@Cerberus Kinda, but they can all be used where in English one would say fucking X
 
We also use English shit that way in Dutch, and also fuck and fucking.
 
@DanBron stay on topic: kutient de mierda
 
4:02 PM
And also a backtranslation, neuk for fuck.
@terdon Ah OK, to modify an adjective or noun, yes.
 
@Mitch Can't, I'm isolated on The Lonely Island of Monolinguals.
 
user208178
@terdon I see, interesting. I didn't know.
 
@DanBron Are they cunning monolinguals at least?
 
In Dutch, kut can also be diminuated to kutje, which is even worse.
 
That's just one example. You can do it all in English as needed.
 
4:04 PM
Or you could say kutje bef, which means "little cunt lick".
 
@terdon There's a civil war among us...
 
:)
 
@Cerberus Can you infix it into words, like fucking can be? absofuckinglutely
 
@DanBron Ah OK. Then I'm not sure what the advantage is, but I really don't know Javascript or Perl or the significance of such differences. But I believe you!
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Not really.
Maybe in a compound noun.
You just cannot ever infix anything in Dutch.
Nor in French, I should think?
 
Dunno. I'm not aware of any cases but then I stopped using my French as a child so my profanity is a bit rusty
 
4:09 PM
> For German, French, English, Dutch,
ExistsCountryWhereTheySpeak(any pair).
Except English-German.
(If you count Frisian as English.)
 
They speak English and German in Germany
 
Ah, but not natively.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I don't think I've ever seen that in any other language, come to think of it.
 
Greek does have infixes.
But not profane ones.
Nor recent ones...
 
It's not the profanity, it's the intensifier. To be able to convert longword into longFOOword and have it understood.
 
4:11 PM
Yeah OK.
But is anything ever intensified with a fane word?
 
Absofuckinglutely is kinda fascinating, really.
 
Quite.
 
@Cerberus Absofornicatingutely?
 
Do you do that in temples?
Fane/fanum = temple.
 
@terdon It's a one off though. can't do that every where
 
4:12 PM
@Cerberus Only in the posh ones.
 
fan-fucking-tastic
 
@terdon Catholic ones?
 
I would guess this sort of thing (adding an intensifier mid-word like that) is relatively new. Anyone know?
 
I was just going to ask that.
 
They also work with bowdlerized f-words like fricken, flippin, etc.
 
@terdon I really think it is linked to profanity, and as such it's Vulgar, so it used not to be written, so we have no texts.
Girls, even?
 
@Cerberus Hey, to each his own.
 
I thought it had been just you and the priest, but OK.
 
NGrams seems to suggest circa 1980
 
Although you're unlikely to have been raised Catholic.
 
4:16 PM
Nope. I was raised, well, kind of a weird cross between Buddhist and Orthodox Christian, I guess.
 
@terdon One would expect it show up at least in vulgar dialogue in print, if it were much older than that.
 
The four noble lines?
 
@Cerberus Aye
 
English is highly irrational: Fuck is used to do almost everything except signify its literal meaning, which is probably why it was considered a bad word in the first place. However now, in its void everybody uses euphemisms in its place to refer to that meaning with ubiquity and yet...
 
What do you mean?
It is often used literally in the sense of fornication
Also:
11
Q: How many different parts of speech can the f-word be used as?

David MIn an "interesting" thread of comments we began to look at the word fuck in several different uses. Most of them were interjections and verb uses as would be expected. But, perhaps dialectally, the word can easily be used as a noun, and even an adjective. I would like to see how many different...

 
4:24 PM
You'd use the word "sex" more often these days because it is somehow considered more polite. That was never a meaning of the word sex until the 1920s...
 
@Tonepoet It all depends on context. When speaking to friends or sexual partners I'd be far more likely to use fuck than have sex.
 
@Tonepoet True!
@terdon Not as often as in its other senses!
 
I guess, but hardly rarely either.
 
@terdon I would not!
 
@Tonepoet That's interesting, I had no idea. Meaning "sexual intercourse" first attested 1929 (in writings of D.H. Lawrence);
 
4:28 PM
Part of that is because you can get away with ruder language in those cases though.
 
@terdon Not rarely.
 
@Tonepoet Of course. The entirety of that, in fact.
But in casual, informal conversation, I think I'd pretty much always use fuck.
 
> sexus II B. The sexual organs
 
Obviously not in any more formal setting.
 
I don't.
 
4:31 PM
Have sex with each other = Mash genitals together
Anyway, the reason I knew it is because of the older dictionaries I prefer generally tend to lack this meaning, which leaves me in a bit of an odd spot since I am trying to make my vocabulary comply to those.
I wonder how many people would understand the words "carnal knowledge" upon first utterance.
 
@Tonepoet I think that is an extension of the Biblical term?
@Tonepoet What are you trying to make your vocabulary comply with, exactly, and why?
 
So is sexual intercourse apparently but I have reason to believe Webster's definition is broader.
Hmm, it's difficult to explain here on Stack Exchange. I'd need to monologue too long for Chat to properly explain the concept, and my personal opinions are certainly off topic elsewhere.
 
4:50 PM
@Tonepoet So... you might be doing that wrong.
 
It would be amazing if I was doing it properly to be honest.
 
also javascript has octals, binaries litterals: 0o11, 0b11, 0xb11. Has also exponentiation now 2**3 (2 power 3)
 
@Tonepoet Even the most ardent of fleshophiles can learn new tricks from the Hindian fleshologists' lurid tomes of yesteryear.
@caub Yes but those are numeric literals not string or regex escapes.
 
@tchrist By fleshophile I suppose you mean lewdster?
 
@tchrist middle example should be string.match(/regex/) because else the regexp is stateful with exec
 
4:59 PM
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 No babies?
 
@Tonepoet Hedon gooed.
 
I'm gonna correct mdn :)
 
@caub Well done.
 
Do it!
Regexes are fun, they fuck up other syntax more profoundly than anything else...
 
in J, you can specify any base for numeric literals, though it only has symbols for the first 36 digits (0-9 + a-z lowercase), as in 22b1m0i4 which is (1*22^4)+(m*22^3)+(0*22^2)+(i*22^1)+(4*22^0) = 468,912 where m has the value 22 (just a coincidence) and i isn't sqrt(-1) but 19.
 
5:03 PM
@caub I am befuddled that they make improvements like these but still can't fix stupid regex and Unicode fuckups
 
if you need more place-values than 36, then instead of numeric literals, you can calculate numbers in any base with J's built-in #. operator, as in 22 #. 1 22 0 18 4 (same as before).
 
Like making you specify underlying binary code units a piece at a time indead of code points.
 
I don't want to specify codepoints or code units, I want to type or copy/paste characters.
I'm with the guy who asked the Unicode question you famously answered, @tchrist: someone who knows better than me should package this all up and just hand it to me.
 
That means you can't use astral characters in square bracketed character classes
It counts them as two UCS-2 code points -- surrogates-- not real characters
Java fixed this be adding \x{12345} notation to regexes.
 
@tchrist hehe, yes regexes are lagging behing, no lookbehinds, ..
 
5:11 PM
By the way tchrist, I liked the piano music you showed us yesterday. I'm not sure if you'll like this as much but I figured I might as well share.
 
@caub Amongst other things.
 
some things are weird :), by the way ... is spreading, the counterpart of destructuring, it's really great
 
What does the notation [...Something] mean?
if it creates an array of some type, I'm not surprised its length differs from the length of a given element (interpreted as a string).
 
@Tonepoet What's with her Muppet??
 
it means spreading all the characters of the string in an array
 
5:17 PM
@caub What dark and twisted sorcery is this?
 
var a=[1,2,3]; [12, ...a, 5]
I don't know :) unicodes are weird
btw, strings are a bit like arrays 'foo'[2], 'foo'.slice(1)
 
@tchrist I think at this point it's a form of identification, but I'm not entirely sure myself. Marasay used to make Youtube videos out of his home and there it was being used as a decoration. I suppose the monkey might be a sentimental childhood toy but I have no idea if my guess is correct, since I can not read Japanese, unfortunately.
 
I so tired of postfix verbs seeing am getting.
@Tonepoet The culture of cuteness seems less like neoteny to me than infantilism.
@caub There's nothing new under the sun. See C string notation.
X = ceil(sin(rand(Y)));
X = ceil sin rand Y;
X = Y.rand.sin.ceil;
X = print Y | rand | sin | ceil;
 
5:34 PM
I strongly prefer the 2nd.
I'll take that unless the lack of mandatory parens forces some major tradeoff in the grammar
I don't like the .postfix notation for universal functions like sin and rand - those aren't properties of individual numbers.
 
That was the question, whether we want a left- or right-branching language.
Postnominal modifiers or modifiers postnominal.
 
I don't like the pipe notation for a PL either. That was a concession to the pre-existing needs of the shell. Chaining / pipelining functions is too common in programming to ask the users to employ special syntax / glue every single time. Again, unless doing so provides some amazing grammatical tradeoff.
 
Algebra puts the function to the left but shells and method calls put them on the right.
 
Ken Iverson made some strong arguments for retaining the RTL chaining in APL and its successors
partly, that was based on the idea that the leftmost thing,t he thing you encounter first, should be the "big idea", followed by less and less salient details
 
5:39 PM
I'm not sure that particular argument holds water, but some of his others do
 
@DanBron That's the same argument as is made in defense of statement modifers to the right.
 
what's a "statement modifier"?
I prefer Perl's postfix conditionals for that reason, when that reason governs
 
@DanBron those
 
oh, good to know they have an official name. there was a Q about them (in English) once on EL&U.
 
@Tonepoet What's that now?
Give dumpster trash if today is Tuesday.
 
5:45 PM
I suppose you could say I'm a bit of a cute-ist myself tchrist, so to suggest that it's that immature is perceived as a slight personal slight. I also supposed that the word hobby would be apt, since we're talking about a toy animal here, even if it is a monkey rather than a horse.
 
@Tonepoet Nice quotation.
Now I wonder about run it a tilt.
 
@Tonepoet See mjd's octopus prop he brings to talks sometimes.
@Cerberus yeah
 
@tchrist Who is that?
 
Mark Jason Dominus.
He's around here somewhere.
 
@cerebrus The O.E.D. thought so too. It's their first attested quote for it, although the original publication was in 1816. Based upon Noah Webster's definition of the word tilt provided some 12 years later, I think it means weaponize.
 
#2 is like X = (ceil ∘ sin ∘ rand)(Y);
 
@Tonepoet Wowie.
 
@caub Why differing notations for arguments?
 
Literally, use his hobby as a weapon?
 
yes, indeed either parentheses everywhere, or none
 
5:54 PM
I'm soooo glad Autohotkey normally doesn't suffer from these kinds of syntax conventions.
 
@Cerberus Well if we interpret the sentence literally, he's talking about a toy horsehead on a stick, so that makes sense I suppose.
 
Oh, OK.
I hadn't read that far back.
 
@caub In J, that's ceil sin rand Y, or as a reuseable verb foo =: ceil@sin@rand then foo Y
 
It's not something I determined by reading further into the context.
 
@Cerberus You keep belying your own protestations of not "being" a programmer.
 
@tchrist If I were, I probably should not mind such conventions.
@Tonepoet Ohh I had no idea!
A hobbly-horse.
 
A hobby is a fairly small, very swift falcon with long, narrow wings. There are four birds called hobby, and some others which, although termed falcon, are very similar. All specialise in being superb aerialists. Although they will take prey on the ground if the opportunity presents itself, most prey is caught on the wing; insects are often caught by hawking, and many different birds are caught in flight, where even the quick maneuvering swifts and swallows cannot escape a hobby. The typical hobbies are traditionally considered a subgenus Hypotriorchis due to their similar morphology: they have...
Silly dictionary
 
@tchrist I know.
 
@DanBron oh, similar in Haskell too, with .
 
Oh, hey, I didn't mention the hawk in that comment. Bah, I got that confused with the answer I was trying to write before it got closed.
 
6:06 PM
@caub Yeah, so far as I know, Haskell is the only non-J lang which permits "point-free programming" in a non-trivial / non-academic sense.
 
The Australian hobby (Falco longipennis), also known as the little falcon, is one of six Australian members of the family Falconidae. This predominately diurnal bird of prey derives its name ‘longipennis’ from its long primary wing feathers. It occurs throughout Australia and other neighbouring countries with migrating individuals found on the islands of Indonesia and New Guinea == Description == Smaller than other falcons, the Australian hobby is relatively slender and long winged. Its plumage varies in colour depending on sex, age and environment with a darker form in humid areas and a lighter...
 
Why is that not a picture of wrestling crocs drunk?
2
 
I'll be wary when someone says he has a hobby now
 
Most hobbies are European. There are no American hobbies.
Please don't take Falco longipennis the wrong way.
 
so pennis are wing feathers, interesting, aha^
 
6:08 PM
Jinx
From Latin.
penna
 
Well, Webster's dictionary isn't really that silly I suppose. A real problem I've noticed with searchable online editions of the dictionary is incompleteness.
 
No, no, not pennis. You're thinking of NO NO NOT THAT you're thinking of that thing that you fly on a sailboat.
 
Another example is with the word "rank". I know A.R.T.F.L. Project's edition of the dictionary, when it was available online, was missing an entry for the word.
It's tricky answering questions because it means I have to search multiple websites sometimes.
 
@Tonepoet: have you seen onelook.com ?
 
@Tonepoet Did you know gullible isn't in the dictionary either.
 
6:19 PM
Yeah but that's not quite what I meant. I mean if I want to use A.D.E.L. dictionary in particular, I have to search every website.
 
I think there are more questions open for review now than there were when I ran the review queue earlier.
 
@MετάEd Seems impossible to keep ahead of it. Disheartening.
 
@MετάEd Oh that's interesting. I never saw the word without the suffix before.
 
@DanBron Yes. There is no clear solution.
 
We do need to put some gates up which must be hurdled before posting.
I know that's somewhat at odds with the original goals of the network, but I don't think that vision properly credited the scope of the downside.
 
6:26 PM
The Triage Queue on SO has been an attempt to address this issue. I'll let you judge its success for yourself.
Some sites have an interstitial page.
 
One of these days I'm going to read through the entirety of Noah Webster's dictionary cover to cover, like Emily Dickenson did...
 
Certain words in the title or tags chosen can also be made to cause warnings or errors.
 
@tchrist I don't have access to the triage queue on SO, I'm <2K there, but the front page does seem somewhat less completely godawful to me in recent months.
 
Another recent experiment lowered the votes to close from 5 to 3 for a month.
 
@tchrist I was thinking more along the lines of a question-asking wizard, with some prompts like "would you like to check the correctness of a phrase? if so paste it here", then on "next", say "this site does not offer proof-reading services"
another option is "do you want to know what a word means?" which makes you type in the word, and the next step in the wizard makes you quote, with attribution, a dictionary definition, and the following step forces you to elucidate exactly what that didn't answer
similarly for etymologies, for "how does X differ from Y?" for "help me name this thingy", etc.
I do also think there should be a requisite questing-asking bootcamp / exam which must be passed before asking your Nth question, with N low.
Just in general teaching people how to ask questions clearly and considerately, irrespective of subject matter.
 
6:32 PM
*This site does not offer proof-reading services, unless a specific difficulty is identified.
 
Would be good to have badge incentives for these things too, like after the "general question asking exam", one for "demonstrating knowledge of general references and resources applicable to this discipline"
 
These are interesting ideas but they are so specific to ELU that I doubt they would get any traction with Stack Overflow.
 
@Tonepoet That's how it's worded now, but I quibble with it: we do not offer proofreading services, and if you identify some small, clearly-defined, and objective scope in which you have doubts, giving your own reasoning & research ... that's not proof-reading any more.
 
But no matter what you do, the norm for first-time posts is that they fail to meet the quality standards consistent with the goal of providing a lasting repository of high-quality answers to domain-specific questions.
 
@MετάEd I was trying to keep it general. The ideas specific to EL&U are just that, instances of the more general template specific to our site. Similar wizards and exams could be constructed for each site.
@tchrist That would not be the norm if the bar were set much high for first-time posts. Of course quantity would drop, as would site visits, content created, ad revenue, and visibility for SE, Inc.
 
6:36 PM
Every so often I reread:
Aug 14 '12 at 14:09, by RegDwight АΑA
 
Which makes me think at least some of this laissez-fair attitude is intentional.
 
@DanBron Or it's the proofiest sort of proof-reading. =P
 
Moreover this is not peculiar to ELU. It occurs throughout the network. My perception is that it becomes worse as a function of that site's success as measured by traffic. The more abstruse and rarefied sites with more of a culture of patient scholarship may be less prone to this than sites like ELU, but the tragedy of the commons awaits all uncurated content.
 
As the number visitors of a website has rises, the wit of the average user lowers is a long held tenet of mine.
 
@Tonepoet tenet
 
6:42 PM
Fix'd.
 
Also think time makes old-timers more intolerant.
And grumpy.
 
That is also an astute observation. A mistake you only have to correct once, is much more tolerable than one you have to frequently suffer.
 
We also suffer <the psych/cogsci term I can't remember> fatigue, because we've been around enough to have seen it all before, and we treat each guy who asks the same old question as if he's the same guy who asked last time
 
Not everyone has the sainted patience of a special-needs kindergarten teacher their whole life long.
 
@DanBron Absolutely.
@tchrist One ought to, though.
And not make impatience policy.
 
6:49 PM
The very same questions will always be asked infinitely many times. Eternity's weight is a burden that ultimately breaks even the best of us.
Suffer the little children.
Everyone's a volunteer. Kindness fatigue is inevitable.
So there will always be turnover.
 
You're under no obligation to police it all.
 
When you're paid to teach eight-year-olds year after year you expect this.
 
Guess what this is.
 
@Cerberus Do you have any proposals to address the rising tide of the review queues on ELU?
 
@tchrist Abolition.
Perhaps it doesn't need doing.
 
6:58 PM
Along with down votes, close votes, and delete votes no doubt.
 
Honestly speaking, it would be nice if the review queue didn't require you to go through all of the questions/answers sequentially.
But I think that's an overall S.E. problem, rather than an E.L.U. one.
 
@Tonepoet What do you mean?
 
The site won't collapse if few questions are ever closed.
They don't pay you.
 
@Cerberus Don't you remember the Stack Egg game? Without closings your site quality goes to hell.
 
No?
 
7:02 PM
Yahoo Answers.
Yahoos answer.
 
@tchrist I mean if I could pick and choose from a list, rather than be force to flag or dismiss all of the questions sequentially, I'd be able to flag the posts I know are problematic without passing judgment on posts I merely doubt. I suppose that part of the purpose of the skip button but still...
 
@Tonepoet oh for first and late posts?
 
@tchrist Yeah.
 
It's ok to say no action needed.
But skipping lets another pair of eyes look it over.
 
Yeah I'd rather not say "no action needed" and be wrong about that personally. I've never used that button in the review queue. However if you use the skip needed button, you can't review the question again later if you realize what's wrong.
 
7:08 PM
Right
 
@tchrist Sorry, I used the wrong words in the second sentence.
 
@Tonepoet skip-> no action needed
 
(My editing skills are awful.) Yeah.
 
I find 'skip' unsatisfying anyway. it's like more chocolates moving past me on the conveyor belt at the candy factory
Yeah..I'd like the review button right on the question that is problematic, rather than having to go through a long queue just to find that single one that needs 'no action needed' or 'keep open'
 
7:24 PM
@Tonepoet Can't you go back to it through the review history? I seem to remember doing that.
I mean, unless of course it's already been reviewed enough times, then you won't be able to review it.
 
7:56 PM
Is snore for when you breathe in noisily while asleep? Or can it be either in or out? ('Cause we kinda have different words for each here)
And is snort only for forcing breath out?
Some dictionaries say yes to both. I want some native impression too though.
 

« first day (2084 days earlier)      last day (2821 days later) »