« first day (2216 days earlier)      last day (2698 days later) » 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 22:00

12:25 AM
@sumelic I am becoming increasingly convinced that all requests for words and phrases are fundamentally a poor fit for the SE format. They're just guessing games and popularity contests, too broad and opinionated.
They draw low quality contributions and copypasta. They drive away the very experts we seek to attract.
They are requests for writing advice, programming advice, and shaming advice.
I say good riddance to bad rubbish.
These are not expert answers.
 
user227867
1:03 AM
It is a beautiful Monday morning in Antarctica, and I am going to sleep. Good night.
 
3:22 AM
From here
 
 
2 hours later…
5:35 AM
I can't say all Americans do this, but I constantly hear many of them pronounce some vowels like they're diphthongs. Examples:
man pronounced not /mæn/, but something like /meæn/
jam, not /dʒæm/, but like /dʒeæ(o)m/
good, not /ɡʊd/, but /ɡʊəd/
I may be inaccurate in my phonemic transcription, but I hope I got across the idea.
Is it addressed or discussed somewhere?
 
6:08 AM
Looks like it's part of what is called the Northern Cities Vowel Shift.
The Northern Cities Vowel Shift (or simply Northern Cities Shift) is a chain shift affecting the sounds of certain vowels in the Inland Northern regional dialect of American English, found in the Great Lakes region. It is the defining feature of the Inland North dialect region, and elements of it are also found to a lesser degree in Upper Midwest American English and Western New England English. == History == == Geography == The name of the shift comes from the region where it occurs, a broad swath of the United States along the Great Lakes, beginning some 50 miles (80 km) west of Alban...
> Inland Northern /æ/ comes to be articulated so that the tongue starts from a position that is higher and fronter than it used to be, and then often glides back toward the center of the mouth, thus producing a centering diphthong of the type [ɛə] or [eə] or at its most extreme [ɪə], which is the vowel heard in England in words like pier and beer. Thus cat and that as pronounced by a Rochesterian may sound like "kyet" and "thyet" to a visitor.
 
 
1 hour later…
user227867
7:15 AM
@tchrist Oh, I see your meta post on SWR which references mine, LOL. Now I get publicity for free, LOL.
 
user227867
7:54 AM
I get such a different browsing experience in Edge, Chrome, and Firefox. That is because of the font setting options. If I uncheck the 'let sites choose their own fonts' in Firefox, I get to choose the fonts for most sites, and they look the most beautiful in Firefox.
 
user227867
Those of you frustrated with fonts in your browser should really try this. It makes a HUGE difference.
 
user227867
I think Mozilla really needs donations. It now asks for donations the moment you visit their site.
 
user227867
I have a feeling that Mozilla might be going bankrupt soon.
 
8:14 AM
@Færd There are various sound changes that may be involved. For example, for me, the rule is very simple: /æ/ is always realized as more-or-less [eə] before any nasal consonant. I have heard this called the "California system" or "nasal system" for ash-tensing. For many Minnesotan speakers, the tensed allophone is also used before /g/.
@Færd: I remember I discussed this in chat with tchrist a while back, and he said he also has tensing before /θ/, as in "bath". chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/33080218#33080218
For many speakers, the raised, diphthongal variant of /æ/ only occurs in certain conditions like these. There is even a phonemic split in some dialects.
 
user227867
9:06 AM
Funiculi funicula funiculi funicula!
 
user227867
10:24 AM
@Tonepoet My ODE, 3rd edition, 2010, just arrived from Book Depository and I have just performed the usual quality check!
 
12:05 PM
If you are a white liberal millennial, <- That should be liberal white millennial, shouldn't it? Or is liberal considered a noun adjunct and part of the noun?
 
12:39 PM
@tchrist Can I ask a regex question? yea will do :)
why this '20161205220000'.match(/^(\d{4})(\d{2})(\d{2})(\d{2})(\d{2})(\d{2})/) give all chunks as expected, but not '20161205220000'.match(/^(\d{4})(\d{2})+$/)
 
12:52 PM
hmm '20161205220000'.match(/(^\d{4}|\d{2})/g) does the job
 
@caub Because your + isn't being applied as you think. You wanted to use a non capturing group to repeat the \d{2}:
$ echo 20161205220000 | perl -lne '/^(\d{4})((?:\d{2})+)$/; print "$1 : $2\n"'
2016 : 1205220000
But yes, if you want each in its own capture group, you can't just use (foo+) AFAIK
Point is, you were trying to repeat \d{2}$ and that can't repeat since you have it anchored to the end of the string.
 
yea, ok, thanks
 
What language is that, by the way? It looks like python but the syntax is off. Is it ruby or something?
 
the great JS :)
 
1:51 PM
Which is the correct term, foot position or feet position?
 
@WillHunting Did you record that one? I'd love to hear it!
@Færd I think for the examples you gave, yes, that is probably inland northern.
But there is also in some varieties of Southern US the phenomenon of dragging out some vowels. Like 'pen' (= /pen/ in GenAmE) can become /pi:jən/.
@SingleFighter I think 'foot position' is preferred . If you are really concerned that it might be confusing (you want to make sure people are positioning both their feet not just one, then say 'position of the feet'. Sometimes a couple extra words are worth it.
 
@Mitch Thank you for your suggestion. Good points!
 
@Helmar The first one sounds more natural to me. Isn't there an ELU question about the order/function of adjectives. 'The little red hen'
@SingleFighter To help decide things, sometimes it works to put the term in a full sentence. At first I was going to say that 'feet position' is perfectly fine (just not as common), then I tried a full sentence with it in my head and it didn't sound good.
gotta run. keep asking and maybe someone will pick up on it.
 
2:09 PM
@Mitch I see. Thanks. :-)
 
2:21 PM
@Mitch Yeah there is, it says color comes very late in the order
 
NVZ
2:46 PM
@tchrist can I speak in private? :)
 
3:06 PM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Offensive body detected: Can the following be considered as a valid oxymoron? by Paritosh Bahukhandi on english.stackexchange.com
 
3:36 PM
@NVZ Yes.
 
4:10 PM
@sumelic True. Nasals. Tensing in bath does sound familiar to me too, but not as much in shag, and certainly not in bat or catch.
Thanks.
@Mitch Yeah, there are all kinds of varieties in pronouncing vowels. It's interesting.
Like Trump's Huge!.
Dayum.
 
@Helmar Those orderings seem contrary to my position. So despite 'white liberal' sounding more natural to me than 'liberal white', the rule seems to say otherwise.
It'd be nice ot other's reactions. I could have wrong ears, or we may be applying the rule wrong, or the rule itself may have nuances.
 
I don't think that "small white fence" and "young white male" are quite the same. I mean that *white* (or any other race-defining color) isn't acting like a normal "
color" word here.
 
@Færd yeah, that one.
 
And thanks becomes thenks sometimes (maybe informally), not theanks, although n is a nasal.
 
@Mitch well you gotta put the millennial in there
 
4:22 PM
@Færd But that one not at all. 1) His is a very slight New Yorkish accent and 2) they pronounce it /ju:dʒ/ instead of the GenAmE /hju:dʒ/ (i.e. 'yuge' instead of 'huge'). He( and others like him would say 'yooman' for 'human' or 'yoomid' for 'humid'
 
That's where I'm unsure liberal white millennial vs. white liberal millenial
 
@terdon yeah, somehow the race thing is involved. maybe.
 
Think of the same sentence with blue or green or some other non-laden color.
 
Could be worth a formal ELU question
 
@terdon I was thinking about that too. Those adjective orders say material comes almost dead last.
 
4:25 PM
@Mitch Yes, they swallow the h. But I think the vowel is different too. It's not exactly /u:/. Something of a schwa is mixed up in that, I think.
Or maybe that's just how they do it in exaggerated parodies of him.
 
@terdon I get my same preferrd order though 'yellow liberal millenial'
 
@Mitch Hmm. It might just be that white liberal is common enough to have become a set phrase.
 
@Færd I find that the parodies have a hard time even dropping the 'h' correctly or if at all.
 
@terdon sure that's a common phrase, but now that's modifying those millennials
 
@terdon could be.
 
4:31 PM
@Mitch Okay, I take that back. He's yuge is different than his imitators'.
I was thinking of this.
Correction: He's yuge --> His yuge.
.
 
@Færd you can edit your post
 
Huh. I hadn't noticed that. How interesting.
 
What do you call the thing that you bet, and you lose or win if you lose or win the bet? The stake?
 
First time I've seen anything interesting coming out of that ass's mouth.
 
@Helmar It was too late.
 
4:39 PM
@Færd Yes. Or the bet.
 
Thanks.
 
Yes. "How much did you bet?" "My bet was more than I have in the world"
 
5:22 PM
Thanks.
So you bet a bet; you don't bet on a bet, right?
You bet a bet on something (like the outcome of a race).
 
5:39 PM
@Færd Generally, you place a bet, or make a bet. You bet on an outcome.
 
I heard someone say You bet on a bet, and if you lose you lose the bet.
So that's not the usual way to say it.
@MetaEd Thanks.
 
user227867
@Mitch I deleted all my previous videos. Maybe I will start a new series of recordings next year, lol. Stay tuned!
 
user227867
I am not calling out any users, but it seems pretty arbitrary which of my posts get migrated to ELL.
 
user227867
It seems it just depends on who cast a vote after seeing the post.
 
user227867
That is another reason I want the merger of ELL and ELU.
 
user227867
5:53 PM
Perhaps half the posts on ELU should be migrated to ELL as well.
 
user227867
Oh, I am adding this as another point in my proposal.
 
user227867
6:11 PM
@tchrist I am pretty surprised your SWR meta post got several downvotes.
 
@WillHunting People get a lot of cheap easy re puta tion from SWRs.
 
6:42 PM
@tchrist I don't know that reputation is that big a factor. Sure, it's a motivator, but people tend to focus on answering questions they enjoy answering (at least to some extent). I think the main cause of different opinions on that question is people's differing levels of tolerance for SWR-type questions.
 
If for most SWR questions all that is needed is a rough synonym of the answer and then some thesaurus search or Googling, then how does that warrant expert attention?
 
@Færd In some cases, answers might describe some of the nuances in meaning of the suggested word.
 
I think most non-expert native speakers appreciate those nuances and can give helpful answers still.
 
@tchrist Are there any users on ELU that didn't?
I think it's absurd to say users get cheap reputation only from SWRs
 
@Færd Well, I think non-experts can give helpful answers to most questions on this site.
 
6:54 PM
All the users who got reputation from 2009 to 2003 are not free from criticism that they got their reputation from ELL questions, or worse.
There are still one user who gets rep from ELL or worse questions on ELU and nobody is doing anything.
 
@sumelic Hmm. Yeah. Maybe most questions of this site are better off on ELL.
 
@Rathony I think the only reason SWRs get attention as a source of rep is that it is such a large category of questions.
 
Only so many of them need definite expert answers.
 
I would be more than 300K if I had been a user from 2009.
And answered all the questions I wanted to answer. Please come on. Wake up!!
 
@Færd Just because a non-expert can attempt to, and possibly succeed at writing a helpful answer, doesn't mean an expert's answer wouldn't be even more helpful. (I think the negations work out here logically, even though I phrased this terribly)
 
6:57 PM
@sumelic Yeap. But look at other users who gained 50 to 90 from basic grammar questions.
What's the difference?
 
@Færd I think the only questions that should be migrated to ELL are ones where an answer from an expert geared towards native English speakers seems like it would confuse the OP, or would not be what they're looking for
 
@sumelic True. That's why experts' participation on ELL should be much appreciated.
 
Is it an ELU rep to gain 50 points from a question asking which to use between "have" and "has"?
 
@Rathony I like grammar questions more because it is harder to look that stuff up. Furthermore, even when you can look it up, many grammar guides are crappy and give bad advice, or they omit things.
 
@sumelic I agree. But NEVER on choosing between have and has after -ing. That's for sure.
Those people who gained enough rep from such lousy questions are saying users who gained rep from SWRs are questionable. Haha
That represents what ELU is all about. No consistency, no agreement, no rule, nothing.
@sumelic I want to propose ELU users get rid of all the reps gained from off-topic questions.
At least for users who joined last year and this year, the impact will be far less than those old users.
 
7:07 PM
@Rathony Hmm, that would be bad news for me. I'd lose all my rep from this answer: english.stackexchange.com/a/275774/77227
 
@sumelic Don't worry. Your rep won't be taken away...
 
It annoys me that that question is closed, actually. What is the point? Closed questions should be reopened or deleted, in the long run. (Or locked, in exceptional cases.) I voted to reopen it, and it also has one pending delete vote. But nobody has finished dealing with it.
 
history.stackexchange.com/questions/33613/… How about this answer? I expected only one or two upvotes. :-)
@sumelic Which side do you want me to vote? I didn't even know the question existed.
 
@Rathony I'd like it reopened, of course. But vote your conscience. I just think it's stupid to have the question closed for lacking research.
 
@sumelic Let me vote tomorrow. I need to think about it if you don't mind. :-)
@sumelic One thing to note is it is wrong and ridiculous to think rep from one certain topic is cheap and others are expensive.
 
7:15 PM
@Rathony No problem. Your vote is your own
 
I will never tolerate whoever says so.
 
@Rathony Well, the real distinction is between "hot network questions" and obscure questions. But nowhere near all SWRs get hot
 
@sumelic Yeap. But there are users who get bit by bit gradually.
 
@Rathony Yes.
 
@sumelic I voted! Which way I won't say!
 
7:17 PM
I always seem to run out of votes on comments. Does anyone else encounter that problem? It's quite irritating
 
OK I'll say. Voted to reopen. Something as well viewed and liked shouldn't be deleted.
 
@Mitch It's too obvious.
 
@Rathony hahhaha. so predictable.
I'm thinking of a number...
 
@Mitch Yeap!! Let's merge ELU and ELL.
 
gah...no not that one!
 
7:18 PM
@Mitch Thank you. I think it would be a waste if it were deleted
 
@Rathony ahahahha. wait. no I don't think they should be merged.
 
@Mitch ∞/∞
 
@sumelic It takes more votes when it has many upvotes!
@Mitch They will be merged within 6 months.
If they don't, I will live in the US.
 
@Rathony Ah right, I forgot that. I think views are also involved
 
@sumelic wow. no i was not thinking of that one, even though I saw it this morning.
@Rathony wow, that's pretty committed.
 
7:19 PM
@Mitch But I'm right anyway, because it's equal to any other number. Right?
 
@Mitch I have nothing to lose.
 
@sumelic oh...we could talk.
 
@Rathony I don't even know what the process for merging sites is. I tried to look it up on SE Meta, but there doesn't seem to be any precedent
 
I'm more inclined to say it is undefined because, algebraically rearranged to solve for a particular value for another operation, most any value would work. But I don't call that the same as that it has any value.
 
Anonymous
It makes sense to delete closed questions if they're adding nothing of value to the site. But if there are upvoted answers on a closed question, even if it doesn't make sense to reopen it, it might make sense to keep the closed question around. If the answers are valuable and relevant to the site, deleting it anyway is throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
 
Anonymous
7:21 PM
But you have to decide that on a case-by-case basis, I think.
 
@sumelic Making history is the fun part.
 
Anonymous
If there are upvoted answers on a question that is clearly off-topic, one that should never have been answered in the first place, then really the upvotes were a mistake and deletion makes sense.
 
@snailplane That sounds boring.
 
Anonymous
But there are a lot of questions where I think it's less clear-cut.
 
@Rathony a lot of money? years trying to get permanent residency?
 
Anonymous
7:22 PM
@sumelic Guitars.SE merged with Music.SE.
 
@Mitch Haha. I have my brother who can lend me 100K.
 
also a mess. bathwater is gross
 
@snailplane That was when they were Beta.
 
@Mitch that's definitely more correct, lol. I was just joking. But seriously, since all things can be derived from a contradiction, I think if you use a bad enough definition of ∞/∞ you can really say it equals anything you want.
Of course, it's a useless definition mathematically
 
Anonymous
@Rathony True. Is that relevant?
 
7:24 PM
@snailplane Of course it is relevant. Why do you think it is irrelevant?
 
@snailplane But what's the value of keeping the question closed? Just a way to show our disdain for OP's who don't do enough research in our judgment? All it does is make the question deletable, and prevent people from posting new answers.
 
Anonymous
I've always imagined the whole "beta" thing is a matter of a few variables you could flip one way or the other. I'm not sure how it would be relevant to the manual merger process.
 
Anonymous
From a technical point of view, it seems like it should work the same way regardless of whether or not the site is graduated.
 
@snailplane Beta is not an SE site.
 
Anonymous
@Rathony I have no idea why you believe this to be true. It is false.
 
7:25 PM
@sumelic oh sure. 'anything you want' satisfies it, but I think all sorts of wrong would come from actually substituting anything you want for it. Like 0=1 which is sort of a shorthand for 'false' in arithmetic
 
It's like a baby in the ...
 
@snailplane Interesting, thanks for the example
 
@sumelic whereas \infty itself is a perfectly natural and useful extension to many number systems.
 
@snailplane Well, (1) on Beta, anybody can be a mod, (2) anybody can set policies. They are very free.
They can be aborted. (3)
 
Anonymous
Graduated sites too can be aborted.
 
Anonymous
7:26 PM
And have been.
 
@snailplane Well, ratio?
 
@snailplane really? any recognizable ones?
literature?
 
Was there any site that was aborted after 7 and a half long years?
 
@WillHunting why did you delete your music channel? It's free.
I think.
 
user227867
@Mitch I am crazy.
 
user227867
7:28 PM
@Mitch Of course it is free, just like SE.
 
@WillHunting haha...that's no excuse.
 
user227867
Sexuality SE never came into being.
 
user227867
That's just being prudish.
 
Anonymous
Startups ran for years. Not seven and a half.
 
It was never consummated
 
7:29 PM
@WillHunting I will commit now.
 
haha, first pun of the day
 
@snailplane Hmm. the answer here says "no": meta.stackexchange.com/questions/203225/… But the comments suggest Not Programming Related > Programming > Software Engineering might be an example, in a way
 
@snailplane there are other avenues for that outside of SE.
 
user227867
Actually, not every SE site is based on objective answers. Some are quite opinionated, right?
 
@sumelic ??
 
7:30 PM
@sumelic ELU and ELL merge will be unprecedented. We don't have to look for precedents.
This will create a force so strong that all the questions will NEVER be closed.
 
Precedents just show that it is technically possible, not that the lack shows that it's not possible.
 
user227867
@Rathony When the Wright brothers invented the plane, everyone thought they were crazy. We don't need precedents. We make history.
 
@Mitch Possible and impossible.
 
user227867
Mariah Carey says there can be miracles when you believe. =)
 
60 questions on ELU and 40 questions on ELL. Haha. If they are merged, it will be 60 questions on ELU/ELL.
What I mean is there is no reason to keep ELL on Stack Exchange.
 
user227867
7:33 PM
I am very happy with my Oxford Bible and Oxford Quran. I think the translations and footnotes are very scholarly and will help me understand these faiths unbiasedly.
 
Anonymous
Merger is a great idea and a terrible idea.
 
Anonymous
It's a great idea in a pie-in-the-sky sense. I'd rather there was just one big site where everyone could have their needs met.
 
user227867
@Rathony Actually, I see it not as deleting one site and keeping the other but just combining them. We can even have a new, third name for the two sites!
 
Anonymous
It's a terrible idea in that that would never actually happen. We'd squish both communities together, and neither community would have their needs met. Everyone would be miserable.
 
Anonymous
Fortunately, it's unlikely to happen.
 
user227867
7:34 PM
I think we can call it English Language Stack Exchange this time, without the 'and Usage', and the address can be shortened to eng.stackexchange.com.
 
Anonymous
Not that I think the present state is ideal, either, but getting rid of ELL would be silly.
 
user227867
@snailplane I understand your fears. I wrote the meta post, but I can empathise with your feelings.
 
@WillHunting I know. But eventually it will become like that.
 
Anonymous
I have no fears. I estimate a zero percent chance of this happening.
 
user227867
@snailplane Hehe, maybe me too. Anyway, this will be my last 'contribution' to SE.
 
7:36 PM
@snailplane Don't be so confident.
 
Anonymous
Splitting off SWR is a fun idea, though.
 
@snailplane It will never happen.
 
user227867
When this meta post discussion is over, I will probably delete my accounts again and vanish forever this time.
 
Anonymous
@WillHunting Farewell forever, Will Hunting! Talk to you again soon.
 
user227867
@snailplane LOL
 
7:37 PM
@snailplane BTW, why do you have to have fears over the merge?
 
Anonymous
I doubt a SWR split would happen too. But I do like the idea.
 
Anonymous
@Rathony I already said I don't.
 
user227867
I think Rathony means why you dislike the idea of merger.
 
Anonymous
So I don't understand the question.
 
@snailplane No, you said you don't have fear. I am curious.
@snailplane It's not a matter of having fear or not.
 
user227867
7:39 PM
@snailplane I must really congratulate ELL which I think is very well-run now. Just look at your awesomely written posts! I really think it is superior to ELU.
 
Look at Japanese SE. Why does English need two sites?
 
Anonymous
@WillHunting ELL has its own problems, but I think it helps people, so I think that's a good thing.
 
user227867
@snailplane If someone who does not know about the two sites were asked which is which, they might even get it the wrong way round.
 
@snailplane ELL has more problems than ELU. That's for sure.
 
Anonymous
@Rathony If you say so.
 
7:41 PM
@snailplane As I said, I am not the only one.
 
user227867
If you have heard of Bourbaki, you know that Jean Dieudonne threatened to resign every time some small thing went not according to his vision. I don't threaten to delete my account or anything like that, but this just reminded me of him, lol @mitch.
 
@snailplane Yes, indeed. I hate to see ELL users come back to ELU and ask a question in the ELL format. That's what really worries me.
No research, no citation, no source of a sentence, nothing.
ELL should stop catering to those users who don't change.
I want to take one user as an example here, but hmm...
 
Anonymous
Don't do that.
 
Anonymous
Talk about behavior, not about individual users.
 
user227867
7:45 PM
@Rathony If I delete this account, I will try not to delete my meta post so that you can refer to it in future should you want to.
 
@snailplane Talk about behavior? Here you go. I will leave a comment on Japanese Se.
@WillHunting ???
 
user227867
@snailplane Here where I live, people don't think using 'Jap' is offensive. It is just short for 'Japanese', but I guess the situation is different in the US.
 
Anonymous
@WillHunting Yes, because in the U.S. we used Jap as a racial slur at the same we sent Japanese Americans to concentration camps. Time has passed and there's some metaphorical distance now, but many Japanese Americans still feel a sting. In many other English-speaking countries it's an unremarkable abbreviation.
 
Anonymous
It can be a bit awkward in online discussions at times, where some people cringe and others just think, "What? It's just an abbreviation."
 
user227867
@snailplane That's the danger of language. You never know when you will offend someone. That's why I am never offended by words which admit a whole range of meanings. But I do get hurt when someone says something bad which is not about the particular word itself.
 
user227867
7:50 PM
Yeah yeah, like I type Eng Fre Ger too, LOL.
 
Anonymous
I tend to use two-letter abbreviations, like en fr de ja
 
user227867
it es
 
Anonymous
There's a set of three-letter abbreviations too, but I don't know many of those.
 
user227867
During my short stay on this current account, I think I already had a few posts migrated to ELL, which was quite surprising for me.
 
user227867
7:55 PM
And none of those are SWR. One could even argue that it is SWR that should be migrated there, as non-native speakers need to learn more vocabulary, lol.
 
I got to run tomorrow. Nice talking to you guys. :-)
 
user227867
@Rathony Good night.
 
@WillHunting I didn't know that.
Those guys were very into algebraic topology and ... other stuff, and not into set theory and logic, so their books and papers on set theory and logic were kind of stupid.
@Rathony I hope someday you'll join us.
And the world will be as one.
Jai guru deva ... om.
@snailplane I think a SWR split is more likely than an ELL/ELU merge
 
Anonymous
@Mitch Me too.
 
I think a bath/trap split is more likely than a cot/caught merge
 
Anonymous
8:07 PM
I'd support the split :-)
 
Anonymous
Hah.
 
Has the L/U merge been floated over at ELL?
 
Anonymous
I think that sort of discussion has mostly taken place on ELU meta.
 
Anonymous
We don't have a thread like Will Hunting's on ELL.
 
@snailplane I don't merge the two, but for the life of me I can't explain in words or symbols the difference to people who do have cot/caught merger
@snailplane If no one there cares then why bother at all?
 
Anonymous
8:09 PM
Make a smooth and slow transition between the two vowels.
 
Anonymous
That makes it easier to perceive, especially if they're looking at your mouth while you do it.
 
I can do it but I can't describe it. I can't tell any difference in mouth stuff
It's like explaining how you know the difference between left and right. I don't know, you just point at it is the best you can do.
 
Anonymous
Or trying to explain absolute pitch to someone without it.
 
Anonymous
In the case of a merger, we have articulatory phonetics to fall back on.
 
Anonymous
You can look up the idealized positions of each vowels in the mouth, which will show up as points on a chart. And if you don't have the merger yourself, you can demonstrate how you personally pronounce them, drawing attention to your mouth while you do it.
 
Anonymous
8:15 PM
In reality, vowels are never pronounced exactly the same way twice. The dots on a chart are the averages of a large number of measurements, but we don't really pronounce vowels exactly in those spots every time. And it's not entirely random, either. We coarticulate with surrounding sounds.
 
Anonymous
But you can still give a rough idea, and you can still pronounce them yourself to demonstrate your personal pronunciation to other people.
 
@snailplane But...
if they don't perceive the difference... they don't perceive the difference.
 
Anonymous
You don't have to use technical terms to do it.
 
Anonymous
@Mitch It's not as black-and-white as that.
 
It sort of is.
 
Anonymous
8:16 PM
It really isn't.
 
hhaha
we're taking opposie positions of what were saying
 
Anonymous
The more sonorant a sound, the easier it is for humans to perceive changes.
 
wait...sonorant is in the vowel direction?
 
Anonymous
Yes.
 
or is that obstruent?
 
Anonymous
8:17 PM
Umm, I'm going to recommend a book called Native Listening.
 
oh obstruent/consonant and sonorant/vowel
but I would disagree with that. I claim that it is easier to perceive differences in consonants
most consonant features (voicing, place of articulation, sibilation, have catagorical (threshold) based perception
but vowels are loose and overlapping
I could make a poop pun here but I'll leave that to your imagination.
 
Anonymous
Well, yes, but you're disagreeing with a fact rather than an opinion.
 
Anonymous
Consonants tend to fall very rigidly into categorical perception. If you gradually vary a recording from one quality to another, perceptually it will seem to suddenly jump from one category to the other, rather than moving smoothly from one to the other.
 
Anonymous
Listeners will tend to be uncertain about which bucket a sound falls into in only a fairly narrow range.
 
Anonymous
8:23 PM
Identification curves are much less steep for vowels.
 
Anonymous
And if you draw out a vowel for a long time as I suggested, and gradually shift from one to the other, it will be much easier for a listener to hear the change in quality.
 
Anonymous
When there's no phonemic distinction to be made, that is, when measuring within-category discrimination, listeners rarely beat chance with consonants, but can hear changes with vowels much more consistently.
 
@snailplane Isn't that what I was saying? How do I disagree with this?
 
Anonymous
10 mins ago, by Mitch
if they don't perceive the difference... they don't perceive the difference.
 
Anonymous
8 mins ago, by Mitch
but I would disagree with that. I claim that it is easier to perceive differences in consonants
 
Anonymous
8:27 PM
But it's not. In experiments, it's much easier to hear sub-category differences in vowels.
 
@snailplane You interpreted it for your purposes but not for mine.
 
Anonymous
We're discussing a sub-category difference, hearing a non-phonemic distinction in vowel space.
 
Anonymous
It's unlikely that they won't be able to hear the difference if you demonstrate it properly.
 
by plural consonants, it is usual understanding of English for that to mean 'different consonants'
 
Anonymous
I interpreted it in line with Grice's maxims.
 
8:28 PM
you are discussing a sub-category difference. I am discussing the situation where it is subcategory for one and not for another.
 
Anonymous
That is exactly the situation I am discussing.
 
@snailplane I disagree. You were speaking counter to Grice's maxims.
 
Anonymous
The listener is the one for whom it is sub-category.
 
@snailplane That is not necessarily the case.
it goes both ways
 
Anonymous
It is, because you were talking about you being the one demonstrating it.
 
Anonymous
8:29 PM
And if they can't hear it, they can't hear it. But it's not so black-and-white.
 
Anonymous
They almost surely can.
 
Anonymous
That's all I was saying.
 
Re black and white, I was making a joke. You're saying 'black and white' is not very black and white, and then I responded that it is somewhat black and white, sort of a gray area of black and whiteness.
@snailplane Yes, that's true
 
Anonymous
Well, I apologize for failing to understand or failing to communicate or both. Probably both.
 
but I was being expansive, whichever side you're on it's hard to understand/perceive the other
@snailplane Yes, to both. From the other side, usually you can't hear a distinction as distinctive (or equally hear a non-distinction as non-distinctive). With great articulation/attention you can perceive a quantitative difference but it won't make it distinctive (without great practice).
 
Anonymous
8:37 PM
Oh, I was just pointing out that it's not nearly as simple as phonemic distinctions being perceptible and non-phonemic being imperceptible.
 
Anonymous
That's where we get into identification curves.
 
Anonymous
The "phoneme" concept is a simplification which doesn't actually reflect how the brain works.
 
Anonymous
It's just a handy tool for talking about language.
 
user227867
Hello, Blue Square is here again.
 
Anonymous
Welcome back, Blue Square! :-)
 
Anonymous
8:39 PM
@WillHunting Have you considered posting on Meta ELL about the merger as well?
 
You could make that your blue pocket handkerchief
 
Anonymous
We're hearing how ELU users feel about the merger, but how do ELL users feel?
 
user227867
@snailplane Hmm, do you think I should post there? In your opinion?
 
@snailplane It's made out to be a big deal in intro linguistics.
 
Anonymous
@WillHunting I think ELL users should have a say.
 
8:40 PM
@WillHunting It doesn't make sense to propose a merger of two things without some idea of both sides.
 
Anonymous
@Mitch It is a big deal! It's just not the whole story.
 
user227867
I guess it's easy for me to create an account on ELL right now, lol.
 
@snailplane so what is your take then on the whores/horse difference or lack thereof?
are they articulartorily/perceptibly different?
 
Anonymous
That would depend on the phonetic context, wouldn't it?
 
@snailplane haha...the only context is GenAmE and not in a sentence.
 
Anonymous
8:42 PM
I mean, /z/ tends to be devoiced in that position, particularly if it's utterance-final, right?
 
in a sentence, all sorts of mistakes are ignorable because of semantics
 
Anonymous
But if there were a following voiced segment, the devoicing would be less likely.
 
@snailplane I never expect that in English, only can only justify because it is so obviously the case in other languages like German and Russian.
I don't hear devoicing at all in English.
If you claimed slight devoicing, I couldn't disagree. But total devoicing like in German/Russian would upset me.
 
Anonymous
Oh, I imagine the devoicing might be toward the end of the /z/.
 
Anonymous
But I also imagine it would vary.
 
Anonymous
8:46 PM
Do you have an account on LDC?
 
@snailplane you mean if a z were drawn out like a bee it turns into a snake? somewhere in the middle?
 
Anonymous
If you can pick a similar example that's more likely to be well-represented in an audio corpus than whores, we can try and test it.
 
Anonymous
We can grab a set of audio files from Switchboard and Fisher.
 
@snailplane no. guest users don't have access to data
 
Anonymous
Well, I have an account.
 
8:49 PM
@snailplane trying to think of a minimal pair
loss/laws?
 
Anonymous
295 audio files with laws, 1007 with loss
 
base/bays
 
Anonymous
Bays is not well represented
 
user227867
@snailplane Done.
 
@snailplane any pairs by the same speaker?
 
Anonymous
8:57 PM
@Mitch Just a sec, the server's truncating a file mid-download :-/
 
Anonymous
Someone needs to kick it. Kicking servers always helps, right?
 
Anonymous
There we go.
 
user227867
@snailplane Hehe, already -3 now, lol
 
@Mitch I bet your brain edits the people who are saying experiment as eggzbeeramint into what you actually say instead.
 
00:00 - 21:0021:00 - 22:00

« first day (2216 days earlier)      last day (2698 days later) »