« first day (2301 days earlier)      last day (2610 days later) » 

12:09 AM
was my question in the question pool answered already?
the "what circumstances led you here?" question
 
similar questions were answered throughout the transcript, yes.
 
thanks ill start from the top then
 
@StevenSagona Daniel has bookmarked the AMA as a conversation here in case you don't want to scroll up to get to the top
 
@ACuriousMind thanks but the deed is done
@heather I'm surprised you aren't expressing any boredom for your classes. I was in a similar situation as you when I was your age (but before the internet was as good of a tool for learning) and my math classes drove me insane. The only thing getting ahead really ended up doing for me was giving me an ego that'd I'd annoy the students around me.
 
12:25 AM
@StevenSagona Drove you insane because the maths classes were too easy for you ? Or am I misinterpreting ?
 
@anonymous yeah but mostly because I already learned the material so it was pointless
things are really simple at the beginning - they just make you do algebra over and over again
 
@ACuriousMind You here? I need to bounce ideas off of someone
 
@StevenSagona True. That would be definitely boring but I am not sure it would drive one insane :). For me it would be a good time to sleep in class without getting noticed :P. I've faced such situations before :D
However, they sort of help in revising the concepts....
 
user228700
@DanielS: About that drink. In the first place, I must warn you that I made it for three people and it was mostly guess-work. I mixed the following ingredients in a bowl using an electric mixer: 3 cups of milk, 1 spoon of instant coffee powder, 5 tablespoons of cocoa powder, 3 "pastries" 5 spoons of sugar and 10 ice cubes. The mixture became quite frothy and warm so I kept it in the freezer to chill for about 10 minutes before gulping it down.
 
user228700
Pastry: Choco pie--
 
user228700
12:31 AM
> A choco pie is a snack cake consisting of two small round layers of cake with marshmallow filling with chocolate covering. (@JohnR: See here <---)
 
Who mixes choco pie in a drink ? :P
The marshmallow would affect the flavour
 
user228700
Me, that's who! :-) It was delicious.
 
LOL :D I will try doing that. Choco-pie+Chocolates+Wafers+Pastries+Fruit Cakes + Coffee + Hot Chocolate... in mixer and make a milk shake out of it :'D
 
that sounds healthy
 
obe
yum
 
12:43 AM
I think cola and wine might be good addition to your ingredients :') @Kaumudi.H
I've tried coffee with hot chocolate before
But your recipe is a class apart :P
 
12:56 AM
@Kaumudi.H sounds good
 
@ACuriousMind Suppose I have some group action on a pointed space. Can I decompose the group as $F\rtimes T$, where $T$ acts transitively and $F$ leaves the basepoint fixed?
Er, I mean, where $T$ is any subgroup that acts transitively.
 
@0celo7 What about the standard $\mathbb{Z}_2$ action on the sphere by the antipodal map?
 
@ACuriousMind I want the action of $G$ to be transitive, sorry
 
@0celo7 Then consider any transitively acting $G$ on the sphere and the action of $G\times\mathbb{Z}_2$.
Well, I guess your question trivially has the answer "yes" for $F$ the trivial group and $T$ the original group...
 
$T$ is given
I have some transitive action $T$
$T\subset G$
 
1:03 AM
Then you can't, by my example. $G\times\mathbb{Z}_2$ acts transitively but you can't decompose it into a product with $G$ such that the second factor leaves any point fixed.
 
What is the $G\times\Bbb Z_2$ action?
flip, then apply $G$?
 
Hm, you're right, two separate group actions don't give an action of their product
 
@ACuriousMind The context is that I'm trying to compute isometry groups (rather, follow Wolf's proofs) of Minkowski spaces and the model constant curvature spaces
He writes down $I(\Bbb R_s^n)=L\cdot V^n$, where $V^n$ is the translational group and $L=\{f\in I(\Bbb R_s^n):f(0)=0\}$
he uses $\cdot$ for the semidirect product
So I'm wondering how he got that
A priori, why should the isometry group be of that form?
 
Ah, here's a silly counterexample: Consider the circle, and the action of $\mathrm{U}(1)$ on it, which is clearly transitive. You can also define a transitive $\mathrm{U}(1)\times\mathrm{U}(1)$-action just by composing the two rotations. As everything is commutative, there's no problem here, but clearly you cannot decompose the $\mathrm{U}(1)^2$ in your fashion w.r.t. to the $\mathrm{U}(1)$ because nothing but the identity leaves any point fixed.
@0celo7 Given any isometry $f$, you can compose it with a translation to achieve $f(0) = 0$.
Nothing to do with general group actions, everything to do with your specific situation :P
 
what?
 
1:14 AM
For any $f\in I$, we have that $g(0) = 0$ for $g = t_f \circ f$ where $t_f$ is the translation that shifts $f(0)$ to $0$.
 
Hmm. I guess the semidirect product is needed for if you decompose $f\circ f'$ in that way?
 
Now apply the inverse translation to get $f = t_f^{-1}\circ g$ and therefore the claimed decomposition.
@0celo7 Yep, since the second isometry will act on the translation coming from decomposing the first.
 
Right. So for the dS/AdS type spaces I have a transitive action of $O^s(n)$ by isometries. Pick some basepoint $x$. So given an isometry $f$, I find a $t\in O^s(n)$ that moves $f(x)$ to $x$. Now, the group leaving $x$ invariant is just $O^k(n-1)$, where $k=s$ or $s-1$. But that group is the "maximal group preserving the inner product on $T_x\Sigma$" and I don't know what the significance of that is
I think that means that if $l\in I(\Sigma)$ leaves $x$ invariant, then $dl\in O^k(n-1)$
So if $L$ is the stabilizer of $x$, then...hmm
$L\subset O^k(n-1)$
@ACuriousMind why is algebra so hard
Ah! An isometry is determined by its value and first derivative. But the value is fixed since it's a stablizer
So we're looking at $L\to O^k(n-1)$ and that's injective
So it's a subset in a natural way
Then we get $I(\Sigma)\cong O^k(n-1)\rtimes O^s(n)$
but the action is just by multiplication, so we can absorb that factor
 
 
1 hour later…
2:40 AM
@Danu Getting into the good stuff. If $M^{2n}$ is complete and connected with constant sectional curvature $K>0$, then $M$ is isometric to $S^{2n}$ with radius $1/\sqrt K$ or to $\Bbb RP^{2n}$ with the same radius.
@ACuriousMind hola
@Secret hi
 
Hi, I missed the AMA cause Japan time is 8:00, where we are still asleep. Glad to see it went well
 
@SirCumference hello
 
2:59 AM
Howdy
@0celo7 Quick question, this is complete nonsense, right?
 
i think so
Why?
 
@0celo7 It relates back to that paper I'm reading, about pseudo profound bullshit.
 
[Attempt at localising unicorns] Suppose there exists something call antiferromagnetic force and suppose it act by enforcing antiferromagnetic order to whatever is being interacted. Now suppose there exists something called iohydrogen. We might expect that it is a state of hydrogen that tend to antialign any hydrogen it encounters in the way. Now suppose negatively curved means concave. There are no known electrostatic configuration that can induce the reversal of electric charge so that
,hydrogen becomes antihydrogen and vise versa. Therefore we concluded iohydrogen does not exist (as charge reversal of hydrogen just turn it into antihydrogen, and it does not preferentially antialign spins of surrounding (anti)hydrogens
 
3:15 AM
@SirCumference I bet I could come up with some pseudo profound bullshit
@SirCumference do you want me to try?
 
@0celo7 I'm open ears. I dealt with those kinds of people hijacking my tours back when I worked in the museum of natural history.
A bit funny sometimes, concerning at others
 
Though if we can engineer a system such that it antialign spins wrt itself and the effect is proportional to some function of distance, then such system is very useful in introducing skymyrions
 
@SirCumference If you interpret temperature as imaginary reciprocal cyclic time, then you get get the Hawking temperature and Hawking-Bekenstein entropy of a Schwarzschild black hole without ever mentioning quantum mechanics. Thus there is a strong link between quantization and temperature and time that we don't understand...it's not just a coincidence.
 
@0celo7 I just showed this to my friend, not telling him it's BS. He said "well, hopefully we can figure it out"
Tbh I would've fallen for it too XD
 
@SirCumference The first sentence is correct.
 
3:21 AM
@0celo7 Do I trust that?
Because you might be messing with me
 
You don't, but I can show you.
It's a standard trick in thermal quantum field theory
 
how is temperature even cyclic?
 
But you apply it to classical GR and somehow it works
@Secret the time is cyclic
 
Yeah I know but a cyclic temperature will mean it is somehow periodic in the system. That cannot happen unless it has suitable boundary conditions?
 
I'm not claiming it makes sense
let me get out my notes
@Secret the proper way is to use boundary conditions, yeah
 
3:24 AM
Brb
 
@Secret do you know about the partition function in quantum stat mech?
 
stat mech yes, quantum stat mech no unless you mean something to do with the way entropy of a quantum state is defined to be the trace of some oservable (something something)
 
@Secret it's $Z=\mathrm{tr}\, e^{-\beta H}$, where $\beta= T^{-1}$
 
I see. That makes sense as the Hamiltonian is the total energy of the state and we are summing up all these contributions which are the energy of the eigenstates
 
so that's $\sum \langle n|e^{-\beta H}|n\rangle$
Now if you write $\beta=it$, then you have $\sum\langle n|e^{-iHt}|n\rangle$
but that's just a path integral going from $|n\rangle\to|n\rangle$ in time $t$
so the states always end up where the begin (cyclic time)
Now let's put this idea to use. Consider the standard Schwarzschild spacetime
$$g=-\left(1-\frac{r_\text{S}}{r}\right)dt^2+\left(1-\frac{r_\text{S}}{r}\right)^{-1}dr^2+r^2d\Omega^2$$
and expand it near the horizon
$$g\simeq -\left(\frac{r-r_\text{S}}{r_\text{S}}\right)dt^2+\left(\frac{r_\text{S}}{r-r_\text{S}}\right)dr^2+r_\text{S}^2d\Omega^2$$
Change variables to $\rho^2=4r_\text{S}(r-r_\text{S})$. Then $\rho d\rho=2r_\text{S}dr$, so that $\rho^2d\rho^2=4r_\text{S}^2 dr^2$ or $(r-r_\text{S})d\rho^2=r_\text{S}dr^2$. Plugging this into $g$, we find that the spacetime near the horizon is desc
where in the last step, we set $t=-i\tau$. Formally, this is known as a Wick rotation. If we now change variables again, setting $\tau=2r_\text{S}\psi$, we obtain
$$g\simeq d\rho^2+\rho^2d\psi^2+r_\text{S}^2d\Omega^2$$
This is the metric of a plane in polar coordinates and and a sphere with radius equal to the Schwarzschild radius of the black hole. So near the horizon, we have the homeomorphism
$$\text{Schwarzschild}\cong E^2\times S^2(r_\text{S})$$
One can picture this as a sheet with a black hole-sized sphere at every point. Since $\psi$ is an angular coordinate, it has periodicity $2\pi$. The Euclidean time $\tau=2 r_\text{S}\psi$ has a recurrence period $\beta =2 r_\text{S}(2\pi)=4\pi r_\text{S}$. Thus, according to the previous discussion, the electromagnetic field propagating near the horizon thinks it is living in a heat bath with temperature
$$T_\text{H}=\frac{1}{\beta}=\frac{1}{4\pi r_\text{S}}=\frac{1}{8\pi GM }=\frac{\hbar}{8\pi GM k}$$
@SirCumference
Crap, I meant to put this at the beginning:
Consider a quantum field, be it the field of a photon, an electron, or whatever, propagating in spacetime. Suppose that it discovers that time is actually imaginary and cyclic. The field is fooled into thinking that it is living in a heat bath, with the temperature determined by the inverse of the recurrence period $\beta$ of this bizarre imaginary time.
 
3:56 AM
I wonder if the imaginary cyclic time means the expectation value of the energy is due to the amplitude oscillating between an earlier and later time. Also, that the recurrence time is a function of the schwartchild radius, I wonder it has some to do with the space and time axes interchange at the horizon?
 
4:17 AM
@Secret Hmm.
I'm not sure!
 
@JohnRennie Please ping me when you come back; I have some questions not related to physics
 
@0celo7 I think we both know that's way above me
 
[random question] is it possible to boost to some noninertial frame such that the magnetic field of the spin becomes an electric field in this new frame. What will such electric field look like?
 
5:04 AM
6
Q: How do I calculate electric fields due to currents of magnetic dipoles?

AndrewShort version of my question: Do dipole currents cause fields? I think currents of aligned magnetic dipoles cause an electric field, but I don't know how to calculate this field except in the simplest of cases. I'd like to know how! Full version of my question: Suppose I have a wire (or pipe) ...

The problem: what if I had a stationary electron, then we cannot model that as dipole currents
 
 
1 hour later…
user228700
6:22 AM
@JohnR: Morning :-) Mangoes and salt?
 
user228700
@anonymous Lol, thanks :-P
 
Morning - busy with malfunctioning servers for a few minutes - back soon ...
 
user228700
Uhhh, that's bad. OK.
 
[cont analysis of website] "One scientist ahead of his time in this area is Mihai Draganescu of Bucharest. In Dr. Draganescu’s view of the world classical concepts such as elementary particles, space, time, material substance, or isolated objects have lost their meaning. Instead he sees a universe and reality whose fabric is woven only of information and energy."
Actually, the view we tend towards nowadays is even energy is also information
and that everything is information in the physics sense
[[WARNING: The next quote is in the realm of esoterics, please proceed with caution]]
"Without a doubt, these new scientific tools, theories and research are closing a circle and leading to the same conclusions of many ancient beliefs. This conclusion is that the world, and everything, and everyone in it are all part of the same, inseparable, dynamic web of energy. "
"Since we are a part of this web of energy is it also possible then that the human mind could master time? Or is it possible that the human mind itself is a time machine. "
Nope that is not correct
 
6:38 AM
who cares
we'll die anyway
 
First, even if the crucial component that underlies reality is indeed information, that is, the parameters need to be specified in order to define a system, there seemed to be no way the mind can couple to systems directly, let alone influence all but the nearest atom that is right next to said neural networks. The correlations from quantum mechanics are also not strong enough to allow nonlocal signalling, nor robust enough to allow very long distance communication except under the very
carefully controlled conditions of quantum experiments. Next
Even if we do suppose ESP and psychic like phenomenon is caused by a quantum network where one end of the system is one or more nerve cell's quantum state and the target end is the affected object in question and in between is a chain of entanglement swapping to establish the local communication channel that affect the state of the target, there are many issues for such arguement:
1. While it is true that quantum states evolve deterministically under time evolution, measurement randomly project the state into one of its eigenstates. This means, one cannot produce the desired outcome of psychic phenomenon as those are deterministic, not probabilistic
 
7:00 AM
Cor, that was a lively first few hours of the day
 
2. Even if we do assume some kind of quantum circuit is in use (with the logical components in question being some atoms in the surrounding environment) to create the psychic phenomenon, and even for the sake of arguement we suppose the coherence is maintained despite the noisy environment, there are so many degrees of freedom in the environment that there is practically no control on where and which subsystems will be correlated and the problem is that you need them to be
in a specific configuration in order to remotely influence a distant system via the network established
 
@DHMO I don't guarantee my accuracy on any topic other than physics, but you're welcome to ask ...
@Kaumudi.H I've never eaten mangoes with salt. But then I still haven't got round to oranges and salt.
 
So no way our mind can coordinate that many subsystems between it and the target to force them into the configuration required to influence it, without being swamped by the whole system taking gazillion other configurations that does nothing
Actually I might make a WSE question about the feasibility of modelling psychic phenomenon as a quantum circuit
If a conclusive negative answer is obtained, then that might be what we need to shut down quantum mysticism
Anyway, continue on the analysis...
 
user228700
7:16 AM
 
user228700
@JohnR ^
 
"Pure energy can travel very easily at the speed of light. By considering all the above can we conclude that thinking, which is an energy-mediated process, should allow for the processes that govern time viewing, time travel and phenomenon such as precognition"
But energy is not matter, you cannot really assign a velocity to it, right?
 
Ooh, that looks nice :-)
 
user228700
Indeed, it was! :-)
 
That mango looks very firm. Is it picked when slightly unripe?
 
user228700
7:20 AM
Chilli powder+Salt+Oil is the orange lava.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Yep. If left on the tree to ripen, the birds and squirrels won't leave any for us!
 
Ah :-)
So would that be eaten as a dessert, a starter or a main course?
 
Also information cannot travel faster than light, so you are screwed anyway
 
user228700
Typically a snack, really.
 
@Secret indeed
 
7:22 AM
We used to get fresh mangoes, as in freshly picked, in the Sudan but in the UK the mangoes have spent weeks in the hold of a ship and aren't anything like as nice.
 
user228700
Ah, OK :-(
 
Is that more of a savoury dish then? Presumably the mangoes aren't very sweet if they aren't fully ripened?
 
user228700
My father went to my native place last week, so he brought them home from our forest over there. I live in an apartment, no space to grow trees.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Yes, they're very sour.
 
One of those flavours that people describe as refreshing :-)
 
7:25 AM
I guess only here in The h-Bar you can simultaneously follow a discussion on quantum mysticism and recipes for delicious snacks.
7
 
user228700
I gots to have lunch and all, toodles for now!
 
Bye
 
I think the implication is clear: Quantum mechanics and quantum field theory is simply the wrong framework to describe psychic phenomenon and esoterica in general. This "energy", under the definition in esoterics, if one intended to translate it into science terms, is actually some quite insane (and its existence is, indeed an open question):
Energy in esoterics = A nonlocal quantum field that permeates all of spacetime and can be influenced deterministically by the soul, another highly nonlocal entity which its true nature is not well defined
Now referring back to experiments: we do not have any evidence of that, we do however have huge constraints in nonlocal phenomenon such as the no communication theorem
 
7:49 AM
A question for Slereah and Johnrennie: How do we know we are not living within a very large CTC. More simply how do we know time as we understood it, is not cyclic
 
8:07 AM
@JohnRennie so I've missed the time when you're here. Please ping me again.
 
@DHMO I'm still here :-)
 
@JohnRennie so this is more of an interview, on people who live in Britain.
 
OK :-)
 
Firstly, are you born in Britain?
@JohnRennie Can you guarantee your accuracy on physics?
 
I will generally not answer a physics question unless I'm pretty sure I know the correct answer, though we all make mistakes.
Anyhow, I was born in the Sudan not the UK. My father was working there.
 
8:11 AM
oh, I see
so, the main point is coming
how many of the British town names with weird pronunciations do you know?
 
@DHMO I can't answer that because I've never attempted to count them. And in any case the pronunciations may not seem weird to me. But I'd guess I know lots of them. Possibly not so many in Wales.
 
@JohnRennie maybe it can be more quantitative if I put it this way: how many of the following British town names do you know the pronunciation of?
Alnwick, Althorp, Alverdiscott, Aslackby, Barnoldswick, Barugh, Great Braugh, Berkeley, Berkshire, Bicester, Cholmondeley, Cholmondeston, Costessey, Cowbit, Derby, Durham, Esher, Euxton, Fowey, Frome, Gloucester, Godmanchester, Isleworth, Leicester, Leominster, Loughborough, Marylebone, Mousehole, Norwich, Oswaldtwistle, Reading, Ruislip, Salisbury, Southwark, Stiffkey, Stivichall, Teignmouth, Tinwistle, Warwick, Woolfardisworthy, Worcester
@JohnRennie Sorry for being long
 
Ones I'm sure about:
Berkeley, Berkshire, Bicester, Cholmondeley, Derby, Durham, Esher, Frome, Gloucester, Isleworth, Leicester, Leominster, Loughborough, Norwich, Reading, Ruislip, Salisbury, Southwark, Teignmouth, Warwick, Worcester
 
I see, thanks.
 
Of the others, there are some I think I know but would have to look up, and there are some I've never heard of.
 
8:21 AM
@JohnRennie you can double-check here
@JohnRennie have you double-checked?
 
I got these right:
Alnwick, Cholmondeston, Cowbit
The others I didn't know.
 
Thanks for taking the survey... here's nothing as your reward!
or, as physicists say, lots of energy.
 
hello everyone
 
@DHMO Is this for a school project, or just curiousity?
 
@JohnRennie the latter
 
8:28 AM
@JohnRennie I will be including about 150 questions in the PHYSICS textbook
do you have any ideas on how one might select the questions
I think selecting the top voted questions isn't a good reflection of quality
I wonder if there is a way to select "top quality questions" without being too arbitrary
 
"So is time an illusion of the human mind? If it is then maybe it just might be possible to jump out of the river of time, run up or down along the river’s banks, and then reenter into the past or the future, perhaps just as easy as we move through the three dimensions of space today." No, if time is an illusion, a mental construct, then it is impossible to travel in time
 
@Kenshin I think the project is ill conceived. I think the PSE works well as a dynamic organism. If you try to freeze it into a book you lose the interactive quality that makes the PSE so great.
 
@JohnRennie the book will be like a souvenier
not a replacement
kind like a SE t-shirt
it is memorobilia
I believe that is what makes the Quora book work too
 
8:42 AM
@Kenshin Try the weekly newsletters which SE provides
For the last few years
 
@anonymous thanks I will have a look there
@anonymous I'm thinking having the book for 2016 only what are your thoughts on that?
or should it be longer?
perhaps 2013-2016 or something?
 
@Kenshin If you make it an yearly book that's a good idea :) You will have your sales increase every year if you can market it properly !
 
potentially
but given I don't have a monopoly over the content it will mean more and more people will try to sell their own book lol
 
Try collecting the 2016 newsletters from someone
of PSE
I didn't subscribe unfortunately
 
yeah pretty interesting
I need their algorithm
 
8:47 AM
@Kenshin Probably you won't get that. But you can ask someone who had subscribed for 2016. Or you can ask on main meta.
Or you could just select top 150 questions from 2016 :P
 
@anonymous the problem is the top questions aren't really that good
often the top questions are targetted at the laymen
and regular users of physics.SE would be bored with them
I have found the "stared" questions are usually pretty good
 
@Moses I'm guessing you mean the fact that your question was tagged as homework. If you disagree with a tag you can always roll back the edit. In this case I agree with you and I have removed the homework tag.
 
@Kenshin (number of laymen>>>those who understand physics well) If you want to make good profit then I would suggest making it a layman's book...
Popular science books have much greater sales than technical books
 
@anonymous generally yes, but the target audience for this book is the users of physics.se
I was only thinking of advertising the book to the users here
 
""The other part of the reason time is believed to be objective is that our universe has a large number of different processes that bear consistent time relations, or frequency of occurrence relations, to each other. For example, the frequency of a fixed-length pendulum is a constant multiple of the half life of a specific radioactive uranium isotope; the relationship does not change as time goes by (at least not much and not ... makes good clocks"
 
8:56 AM
BTW it completely depends on what you want out of it. You want to make money or you want to make it a book for physicists ? If it is the latter then I'm quite certain that your profit will be very low :P
@Kenshin
And why would physics se users be interested in buying it?
They are already using the site regularly
 
@anonymous my plan isn't to make money, but to have a memorobilia item
@anonymous you do have a point though
I will see to have something for everyone I guess
questions for the laymen
 
And more recently, we have nonequilibrium matter such as time crystals being made
 
and some more advanced questions
@anonymous I've noticed the best questions on physics se are from 2012 and 2013
perhaps the first book can be from 2012-2016?
or is that too weird?
 
@Kenshin Yes it could be. Not a bad idea! After that you could publish it yearly :)
 
Ok @anonymous I think I will aim to get the best from 2012-2016
 
9:00 AM
In the first edition don't mention the starting year...just say it is updated till 2016
 
@anonymous good idea
saying 2012-2016 is weird but up to 2016 is much nicer :)
 
:) All the best!
 
ty
 
9:22 AM
That superior STEM feeling~
 
@Slereah Who is bigger? The scientist or the engineer ? :P
 
The scientist, probably, since I am one
Well I guess I have an engineering degree, too
But frankly, doing that software engineering degree was insultingly easy
Basically monkey work
Doing the job I realized that I didn't even need the degree
Most software engineering nowadays is basically googling
 
@Slereah That's called IT work. Software engineering is more fun than that!
 
My job was devising some machine learning solution for mechanical failures
It still didn't require anything I learned during the degree
 
I guess the pure mathematician is the biggest in size looking down at all of us puny creatures :P
i like this : xkcd.com/435
 
9:32 AM
 
Same time :'D
 
user image
3
$\Bbb R^2 \setminus \{0\}$ isn't homeomorphic to $S^1$ >:|
It's homeomorphic to $S^1 \times \Bbb R$
Hm, might be $S^1 \times \Bbb R^+$
 
9:47 AM
@Slereah What site is that ? O_o
 
4chan
 
Its looks like the OP wanted to compose an erotica article rather than sharing something about physics :'P @Slereah
 
Poor attempt
Such basic errors take me right out of the story
 
@Slereah Yeah, we need some high quality fifty shades of physics XD It will sell well ;)
 
10:08 AM
Then again there is a homeomorphism from $\Bbb R^+$ to $\Bbb R$
 
10:26 AM
@Slereah real and imaginary on the same axis?
 
After a long and hard process I have converted all my music to FLAC, all my album art to PNG and enforced art size >= 490x490
 
Aha FLAC! I thought you were an ALAC diehard!
 
Not a diehard :P
I just used ALAC because I needed Apple compatibility for a long time
Since I haven't used any Apple products for music in a long time I went back to FLAC
which is what I used originally
Transcoding >160GB of music takes time though
 
I didn't realise Apple had open sourced ALAC. I should retract some of the rude thoughts I've been thinking about them.
 
They did a while ago, but the format hasn't really been well maintained IMHO
FLAC has a much more active team
Hi-Fi Apple users tend to use AIFF, which is uncompressed PCM
 
10:40 AM
I use FLAC when I want uncompressed audio. But I have loads of albums from bands I hardly ever listen to, and I've used 256K or 320K mp3 for those on the grounds I'm not so fussed about the quality.
 
I don't care about quality too much, it's more about the archival characteristics of lossless audio
I just converted everything from FLAC to ALAC then back to FLAC years later and they are all the same
conversely if I had MP3, converted to OGG, and then back to MP3 it wouldn't have been so pretty
 
True. Going to mp3 is a one way process qualitywise.
 
Most of the time I don't mind the sound quality difference between FLAC and good MP3 or AAC, I can hear it but I have to focus so I don't care for it. I care a lot about making sure I can preserve my music through time though
Which is why it takes me about a week to do a change like this between converting the files, adjusting metadata, testing all files to see if they decode correctly, crosschecking FLAC's stored checksum with the audiostream checksum after transferring to the new drive, making sure all embedded artwork is the same as the folder.png image in the album folder and so on
 
How is D correct?
 
heheh 420
 
10:54 AM
@YashasSamaga what does $\Psi_{420}$ mean?
 
I think that's a mistake.
 
n=4, l=2, m=0
 
so 4p orbital?
 
420 is a 4d orbital
 
The 4s orbital has three nodes, but the 4d orbitals don't.
 
10:55 AM
@JohnRennie only 1 node?
 
only one radial node
you have two angular nodes
 
Yes.
 
agreed
 
@Slereah those who set the papers have a good sense of humor :D
 
@YashasSamaga (D) should be wrong, isn't it ? Answer should be 1. Where did you get this question ?
 
10:59 AM
Resonance Paper
 
AITS paper?
 

« first day (2301 days earlier)      last day (2610 days later) »