« first day (2337 days earlier)      last day (2578 days later) » 

12:20 AM
@OBE halp, I need room on my shelf
the only book I can move is Lee
 
1:05 AM
I moved Lee but it seems so...wrong now
 
OBE
@0celouvsky idk what books you have.
but my books don't take up any space 8)
 
too damn many
@OBE what?
your book is on my shelf, don't worry
I used it for my measure theory class the other day
 
OBE
oh right
@0celo7 this is my reading list can you help:
 
If $(f_n)$ is a sequence in $L^p$ that converges pointwise a.e. to $f$, and if furthermore $||f_n||\le C$ for all $n$, then $$\lim_n \int||f_n|^p-|f_n-f|^p-|f|^p|\, dx=0.$$
 
OBE
nvm it will take too long to type
 
1:12 AM
@OBE I put Lee back, moved something else to a different shelf
springer sale has been good for the yellow on my shelf :)
@OBE what?
just type it or you won't get help
@OBE learn measure theory from Halmos
 
OBE
it's not different than before so whatever.
 
that's all I can say
 
OBE
same books you recommended
 
1:29 AM
@OBE do you know the book by halmos?
 
OBE
seen it
how can you tell if a measure theory book is good?
 
I've read it?
 
OBE
indicators?
 
it's very abstract yet very concrete
not a single picture in the book
lots of examples but all optional if you want to get the heart of the matter
He basically proves everything you'd want from basic measure theory
 
OBE
okay I'll look at it when I want to learn measure theory
 
1:32 AM
You should learn measure theory as soon as possible
 
OBE
I am doing everything right now and I feel overwhelmed
 
it opens many doors
@OBE what are you learning rn?
 
OBE
everything
I don't even know
I just have like 30 tabs of books open in my reader
 
like what?
let's talk about something
I'm bored, don't want to study
 
OBE
oh
what do you want to talk about
 
1:39 AM
whatever you're learning
analysis, geometry, GR preferably
will tolerate algebra I guess
 
OBE
okay
I don't have any questions right now because I didn't do many exercises yet
which is bad
 
tsk
what books have you been reading, I can think of a good exercise.
 
OBE
no exercise right now plz
I'm not ready for one
 
oh come on
 
OBE
lol I just don't want to risk not being able to do it
it's public embarrassment
 
1:46 AM
skype then
 
OBE
can we do it in a few days from now I don't feel so well today and I got a new laptop so I forgot my skype acc
I also don't want to disappoint you since that's all I've been doing recently
 
ok
hope you feel better
 
OBE
thanks
 
oooo
so many interesting books in the world
 
OBE
what's that about
 
1:53 AM
geometric measure theory
 
OBE
oh sounds cool
what have you been studying recently btw
still analysis?
 
@OBE Fourier transforms
Currently working on the Malgrange-Ehrenpreis theorem
It says that any constant coefficient linear PDE has a Green's function, and gives an estimate for the solutions it produces
after I do that, then I want to learn about pseudodifferential operators
but I also want to learn some geometry/topology
and some cosmology
too much stuff to learn
 
OBE
cosmology?
you're doing physics again?
 
I just want to know what's going on in the sky is all
 
OBE
true
you still have solid state listed in your interests
how much do you know about it?
 
2:04 AM
Not much, more practical stuff
 
OBE
oh okay
what music have you been listening too lately?
 
I am trying to understand impedance spectrometry from a theoretical perspective but it's hard
Handler's EM class was awful and did not prepare me for it
I don't understand what e.g. complex resistivity is supposed to be
 
rob
@0celouvsky Complex resistivity or complex impedance?
Or is there a difference?
 
Complex resistivity
@rob Apparently, which is what's screwing me up
I know that our impedance spectrometer can plot complex resistivity and complex impedance and apparently these are different things
I'm scared to ask what it's supposed to be
 
rob
Is this where a capacitor has an impedance $1/jωC$, and an inductor an impedance $jωL$, so that the magnitude of the impedance depends on the frequency?
 
OBE
2:08 AM
@0celouvsky wow this is not how science works
 
@rob yes, that's the basic idea of the machine
it can also change temperatures and atmospheres
it's super fancy
 
rob
I don't know that I've heard of an "impedance spectrometer." Can you describe what it is/does?
 
@rob Broadband dielectric spectrometer. It can measure complex impedance/ionic conductivity to a very high degree of precision. It gives real time data with variable temperature/frequency
It's a hot topic in the nuclear community because ionic conductivity is a major player in nuclear materials and fuel cells
 
rob
So, you put samples in it? Solid samples? liquid samples? circuit parts?
 
powders and pellets
there's a setup for liquid samples but we don't have it
 
rob
2:12 AM
Is the geometry of the sample constrained somehow? I'd expect that to affect the complex part of the impedance.
 
@rob As long as the sample completely covers both electrodes, it doesn't matter.
The thickness is the only variable then, and the software accounts for that.
 
rob
@0celouvsky Ah, okay. I'm wiki-ing. I'll be an expert in a minute.
 
@rob I saw someone in an eno slung across the columns on the side of South College today
I didn't know such a thing was possible
 
rob
2:28 AM
So I guess you fill the gap between your electrodes with the material you're interested it, drive the electrodes with some AC voltage (possibly atop some polarizing DC bias), and measure the amplitude and phase shift of the current that's transmitted through the material. If you're clever, you could interpret details in the way the impedance changes with frequency in terms of some model of the material.
@0celouvsky Is that the basic idea? What sorts of materials are you testing? What sorts of driving frequencies?
 
@rob that's it
@rob Everything from pyrochlores to spinel to copper
We hope to get another one to be able to use it on radioactive samples
Frequencies go from E-3 Hz to E7
 
rob
@0celouvsky Conducting metallic copper, or some insulating oxide? Your other exmaples seem to be minerals.
 
@rob Metallic, but we're interested in an oxide on the surface
so...both
 
rob
@0celouvsky Okay. The JLab presentation I linked a couple of comments up is about characterizing surface chemistry.
 
you have to do a trick with copper because the conductivity is literally "off the charts"
 
rob
2:35 AM
@0celouvsky So suppose you put your favorite stuff in this spectrometer, at your favorite temperature and pressure, and you get an interesting-looking report about its impedance over some frequency range. What does that interesting spectrum look like?
Give me an example to work with, something you've tried so far.
 
I haven't done anything with it yet! I've only measured things, not interpreted data
Actually measuring things is a PITA, I'm just getting the hang of it
 
rob
@0celouvsky When you "measured things," did you get data and not understand what you were looking at? or did the machine just beep at you and email the results to your supervisor?
 
I hope to run ceria-gallia pellets through it shortly. Then I can tell you more. Supposedly the gallia doped ceria will explode the ionic conductivity
@rob Yeah I got data, then gave it to the postdoc
TBH I don't think any of the profs in my department do research. They're always at conferences and whatnot
 
rob
@0celouvsky The grad student is dying to explain it to somebody.
Ask her.
 
Him
 
rob
2:39 AM
Whichever.
 
@rob I'm going to be making samples for the machine tomorrow
So we'll see
I need to perfect my pellet pressing technique. We have a German collaborator who makes these pellets that look too good to be true
@OBE Ransom 2 by Mike Will
 
3:03 AM
> Last update: December 13, 1999
wonderful
 
3:31 AM
@yuggib Are the Hormanders self-contained? i.e. if I know something about FT/distributions, can I read Volume III, or do I need to know specific estimates from previous volumes? It seems exactly aligned with my interests.
 
vzn
4:11 AM
@Secret interesting! theres actually a large body of research now on econophysics, intend to write a blog on that sometime... esp like articles that attempt to discern dynamics of inequality and its possible deleterious effects... taking a political question and turning it into a scientific one... an occasional triumph of other areas of math... eg somewhat like arrows thm! etc
 
4:23 AM
Today I am fighting with a bunch of people who believe the earth is flat.
 
4:48 AM
are you winning?
 
0
Q: How to use Young diagrams to express the product of an SU(2) doublet and an SU(2) singlet?

ShenHow to use Young diagrams to express the product of an SU(2) doublet and an SU(2) singlet, i.e. $2 \otimes 1 = 2$? I can only think of it as follows: \begin{equation} \Box \otimes \Box = \Box\Box \oplus \begin{array}{|r|r|} \hline \\ \hline \\ \hline \end{array} \end{equation} But this seems not...

 
@skillpatrol nope... they talk shit and if I tell that "they are talking shit" then they tell I don't know science
ignorants have to be ignored
 
5:11 AM
@dmckee Silverberg's output is mixed, but then I guess you could say that of most writers. I remember loving The Book of Skulls as a teenager, but then I recently reread The Gate of Worlds and it was pretty average.
I don't think Amanda and the Alien is a great story and I'm a bit mystified as to why that question has attracted so much attention. I suspect the hand of the HNQ is at work again.
 
6:11 AM
@YashasSamaga you got it pal. Don't let them drag you down to their level.
They will beat you with experience :-)
 
6:29 AM
@0celouvsky not conpletely self-contained; some theorem from the other books is used.
 
user228700
7:03 AM
@JohnR: Hello! :-)
 
user228700
@YashasSamaga Not to be pedantic but is "ignorants" a legit word?
 
@Kaumudi.H ignoramuses ?
 
user228700
Heh. I suppose there is no way around this one; "ignorants" doesn't sound legit and "ignoramuses" sounds overly pretentious.
 
user228700
@JohnR: BTW, do u happen to have any thoughts (interesting or otherwise) about the distinction between inherent "us-ness" and the "us" that is constituted by the thoughts/opinions of the people around us, the content that we consume, etc?
 
user228700
(If so, I'd like to hear said thoughts after my exams :-P)
 
7:13 AM
I must admit I'm not sure what you are getting at
You're presumably wondering about the different ways groups of people can bond?
 
user228700
Huh? No, I'm wondering about possibly the broadest branch of Philosophy, the inquiry of "What does being human even mean?" :-P
 
user228700
Wokay, it might take me some more time to express what I really mean. Never mind, I'll ask again later.
 
7:25 AM
Noun: ignorants
  1. plural of ignorant
Adjective: ignorants m pl
  1. masculine plural of ignorant...
 
user228700
Eh, nice!
 
yeah, it must be built in
 
8:14 AM
Hii
@JohnRennie
 
Morning
 
I have statement , which I am unable to understand
A parallel beam of fast moving electrons is incident normally on a narrow slit . A screen is placed at a large distance from the slit . If the speed of the electrons is increased ,then why the angular width of the central maximum of the diffraction pattern will decrease .
@JohnRennie can you please explain me this statement
 
@skillpatrol @Kaumudi.H I'm unconvinced about this
 
+1 @JohnRennie
 
@TrYiSCheM the electrons are being diffracted by the slit in the same way that light is diffracted by a slit. The diffraction pattern will be a sinc function. OK so far?
 
8:24 AM
it will not excat sine function
 
I'm just going to nip off and make a copy while you're thinking about that ...
@TrYiSCheM why not?
 
because it is single slit
in ydse there is sine function
 
@TrYiSCheM sinc not sine. The sinc function is $\sin\theta/\theta$.
In mathematics, physics and engineering, the cardinal sine function or sinc function, denoted by sinc(x), has two slightly different definitions. In mathematics, the historical unnormalized sinc function is defined for x ≠ 0 by sinc ⁡ ( x ) = sin ⁡ ( x ) x . {\displaystyle \operatorname {sinc} (x)={\frac {\sin(x)}{x}}~.} In digital signal processing...
 
8:29 AM
oh sorry
ok it is sinc function
 
OK. When you change the speed of the electrons you change their de Broglie wavelength because the wavelength is given by $$ \lambda = \frac{h}{p}$$. And when you change the wavelength you change the diffraction pattern.
 
oh great
that's why angular width decreases
Thanks for helping
 
@TrYiSCheM you're welcome - hope it helped!
@BernardoMeurer: take note :-)
 
@JohnRennie yeah it helped
 
user228700
9:11 AM
@JohnRennie Thank you! :-) I'm reading the question now and
 
user228700
> My local library has just closed
 
user228700
Has it really? x'D
 
@Kaumudi.H The library hasn't gone for good. It is moving to a new building and it's closed for a month while they do the move.
The new building looks really nice so the downtime will be well worth it.
 
user228700
Oh, I see. I thought u meant it as "It's evening and my local library has just closed"
 
I should have said recently closed. I always feel a bit nervous asking questions on the English SE in case my question is criticised for poor grammar :-)
 
user228700
9:16 AM
Ah, I was just about to edit "Hindu" to "Hindi" but I doubt if Yashas is a native Hindi speaker. Besides, I don't believe that this is a case in which it is OK to accept this usage if being used in "Indian English".
 
user228700
...sure, we may be allowed to include slang of our own and yes, it's quite difficult to rectify deep-rooted mistakes (such as using "doubt" as a synonym to "question") but it is English, after all.
 
Not everyone will agree, but I consider Indian English, Caribbean English, etc, to be perfectly valid forms of the language. There is nothing sacred about English as defined by the OED and Fowler.
And American English as well of course, though it's traditional to disparage American English just to annoy Americans :-)
 
user228700
:-) Heh. I suppose this leads me to think about the origin of language itself etc. :-|
 
user228700
...better think about revision first. I'll revisit this in a while :-P Oh, hang on, can you please help with something else English-related?
 
@Kaumudi.H yes, if I can
 
user228700
9:24 AM
OK. When to use "a while" and "awhile"? I Googled this but I'm afraid I don't understand it :-|
 
awhile in an adverb.
So you say I walked awhile.
 
user228700
Ohhh. Right.
 
In the form a while the word while is a noun.
 
user228700
I have been making this mistake for a horribly long while :-|
 
I don't hear the word awhile used much these days. I suspect it is going out of fashion in modern English.
 
user228700
9:28 AM
All this is scary for a person who hopes to write something someday that at least a little people will like :-|
 
Writing doesn't have to be grammatically perfect to be entertaining. Rather the reverse I think. All the best authors take liberties with the language. Shakespeare just invented words when he ran out :-)
 
user228700
x'D Right.
 
user228700
...although, u have to admit that writing in Indian English sounds terrible. It also constricts the reach of the article or book or whatever.
 
user228700
Then again, there are exceptions.
 
As an English speaking Englishman, when authors write in other dialects it adds an exoticism that can make books more interesting.
 
user228700
9:42 AM
I understand that but you haven't read what I've read (or rather, tried to read :-P) I suppose it boils down to how one uses the words more than the dialect, etc. I mean-and please don't hang me for this-I genuinely like some of Chetan Bhagat's books.
 
user228700
This is all too subjective though.
 
Good morning folks
 
user228700
Hi :-)
 
Morning
 
@Kaumudi.H Surprised I get attention when the cuter nerd, JR, is around
 
user228700
9:44 AM
Oye, @SirCumference: What about the book?!
 
user228700
@BernardoMeurer :'-(
 
user228700
I'll check it out, thanks :-)
 
It's written in Glasgow dialect and even for a native English speaker it's almost incomprehensible. But it's strangely fascinating.
 
user228700
9:46 AM
Jeez, @SirCumference, I didn't mean to wake u up or whatever.
 
yo
do you want to be a poet or author @Kaumudi.H
 
user228700
@Kenshin Yeah, kind of.
 
user228700
I mean, I dunno. I already write loads. I just don't share it with people.
 
what do you write about?
 
user228700
...that's a difficult question to answer. I write about many many things.
 
9:50 AM
like stories and stuff?
like magic?
 
user228700
Nope. I'm no good at plot development and all yet. Not stories.
 
or crime?
 
user228700
No man, I don't write stories.
 
oh k
what stuff then
 
u no.. science stuff
 
9:51 AM
oh like philosophy
 
user228700
No...
 
oh umm like non-ficiton?
like text books?
 
user228700
Dude -_-
 
cool
I could never write a textbook
 
user228700
Dood -_-
 
9:52 AM
:D
 
like totally non-fiction.
 
^ who is dis guy
 
user228700
x'D
 
idek.. imma dismiss myself
 
user228700
I don't think it's possible for me to accurately describe exactly what I write about. Just...stuff will have to do for now.
 
user228700
9:54 AM
I mean, I also write letters and poems and crap from time to time but not as frequently as the other "stuff".
 
cool
i hope one day I may get the pleasure to read some
 
user228700
:-P They're terrible...which is why I don't share it any other human beings. I mean, except the letters. That I write for other people and heh, it's so true how u write so much better when you write as a gift for people. The other stuff I write just for myself so wow, that stuff is not nearly as good.
 
user228700
Anyhoo...
 
it's ok bro good or bad i don't judge it
 
user228700
I am marvelling at how "hipster-y" I sound x'D
 
9:59 AM
@JohnRennie I actually prefer flashlight, because I often need to refer to both torches (the fire on a stick type) and torches (the electronic device that illuminate places directionally)
My preferences:
Truck > lorry (I tend to use the latter for trucks that have lots of pipes or log like goods strapped on it)
This is the first time I learnt of the word Bonnet
Trunk > Boot
Petrol > Gas (Petrol is more descriptive)
No preference between diapers and nappies
I should say there exists something called tin can
I tend to use biscuits when it is not round in shape, and cookies usually for the chocochips ones
I have a slight preference of football to soccer
Flashlight for the electronic thing, torch for either. Useful when I need to refer to both types of torches at the same time
I have slight preference to lift. elevator I tend to use for larger ones
No preference between rubber and eraser
In short, I prefer more descriptive sounding words
 
@JohnRennie Burned myself making Tea :(
 
Ouch :-(
The sacrifices we make to feed our addictions :-)
 
Pretty bad burn on my left index finger
But it was because I'm a dumbass
I was washing the pan I used to heat the water
And a little meta thing near the end of the handle hadn't cooled down yet because it hadn't touched the water
 
Years ago at the works canteen I picked up a bowl of sponge pudding with (hot) custard and started walking towards the till to pay for it. Halfway there I realised the tip of my thumb was in the (hot) custard. It was so badly scalded I had to go to the health centre!
 
How can it take you halfway there to realize that? :P
 
10:15 AM
I think the skin of your thumb is quite thick because it gets calloused. Plus it was only a couple of seconds before I realised - you can walk a fair distance in two seconds.
I didn't want to just drop the bowl so I rushed to the till where I could put the bowl down, and got burned some more during the time that took.
 
Holy crap
 
And did I get any sympathy from my friends? What do you think? :-)
 
Nope
That means they're good friends
Good friends poke your burned finger
 
And say Does this hurt? :-)
 
Yep
@ACuriousMind Can I burn your finger?
 
10:34 AM
[Philosophy] Good luck finding a way to test this : plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia-inverted
 
@BernardoMeurer No.
 
10:50 AM
@JohnRennie that made me laugh, how English - getting scolded by hot custard and prolonging the pain by trying to gracefully put it down without creating a scene
 
Shrug :-)
 
Any good science book recommendations? This historical fiction about the invention of the light bulb may interest physicists, a.co/7vtslZp
 
::waits for @JohnRennie to recommend that book about breasts again::
 
@BernardoMeurer can you recommend something more introductory? ;)
 
10:59 AM
@innisfree I really enjoyed Bill Schutt's book Cannibalism. I suppose biology counts as a science :-)
 
@ACuriousMind ah, yes :-)
It's also biology, but I recommend Raymond Coppinger's book What Is a Dog. It gives some fascinating accounts of evolution in action.
I tend not to read popular science physics books these days - I've learned too much physics for them to be interesting. Sad in a way.
 
Haha, that's perfect @BernardoMeurer. That looks great, I learnt something right away from the blurb. It never crossed my mind that most dogs were wild
 
Coppinger's studies of the dog communities at third world rubbish dumps are absolutely fascinating. Any evolution denier should be forced to read them!
 
Aren't there lots of mysteries about the evolutionary history of dogs?
 
11:09 AM
Ah, yes, and for more on that read Coyote America by Dan Flores. It's (obviously) about coyotes not dometic dogs but it does go into canine evolution.
 
I am watching atheists who don't understand physics fighting with religious people who also don't understand physics. This world is a ridiculous place.
Religious people trying to explain gravity of a flat earth using Gauss law! It's funny.
Apparently, the atheists who are arguing there have no clue about Gauss law.
 
11:25 AM
@YashasSamaga have you read that question on jee prepation room
 
Very interesting, I hadn't thought there could be maximum temperature!
 
@Secret Oh my god
Now I'm starving
@Kaumudi.H Sorry, it came last night, forgot to tell you XD
 
11:38 AM
That's not even a chocolate chip cookie. It is not even the original, but a duplicate from google search
 
I'll have to start reading when I'm done with my next few tests
 
Previous night dream:
forgot except in h bar, someone talked about

"There are infinite number of words of ..."

which converges to some number according to mathematicians. Sir Cumference then expressed that this is the reason he dislike mathematicians defining stuff. His comment is then being starred once
Reality check: Nope I never have any records of Sir Cumference ranting about mathematicians
 
user228700
12:18 PM
@SirCumference -_- OK. Have u started reading it?
 
user228700
@SirCumference Oh, I didn't read this message :-P OK.
 
12:32 PM
They told me I would have more free time in college ;-;
Or at least more than high school
 
user228700
@SirCumference :-P Who is "they"? No one ever tells me that.
 
^
 
@Kaumudi.H they tried to play us
 
@Kaumudi.H Some family and friends
 
They tried to hold us down
Down with they
 
12:41 PM
They always told me university would be hard.
 
Bless up
They told me I would have to study
 
@ACuriousMind You have a good they, I didn't
 
::memorizes proof of Egorov's theorem::
I have an exam in 20 mins pls give energy
 
::gives energy::
 
user228700
"They" told me that University will be much easier than high school but again, not much time to be proactive about what to do.
 
user228700
12:43 PM
@0celouvsky ::Sends "energy vibes" in your direction:: (To the general West :-P)
 
@0celouvsky You have the potential to give yourself energy
 
"They" told me that it's what you make it, but if you are doing it right, it should be hard, but fun.
 
::devours energy:: (I'm a vampire, what can I do?)
 
@SirCumference lol
puns are great
 
The best puns are the worst puns :)
 
12:44 PM
@ACuriousMind wtf you don't even like measure theory
 
@ACuriousMind Vampire robots. The world is doomed.
 
Nov 25 '16 at 16:38, by John Rennie
What do you get if cross a vampire with a robot?
Nov 25 '16 at 16:39, by John Rennie
NosfeR2-D2
 
Darn it that's good...
 
Where does the energy of redshifted light go? One article says conservation of energy does not work and another article says it goes into the space.
The point is pretty simple: back when you thought energy was conserved, there was a reason why you thought that, namely time-translation invariance. A fancy way of saying “the background on which particles and forces evolve, as well as the dynamical rules governing their motions, are fixed, not changing with time.”
But in general relativity that’s simply no longer true. Einstein tells us that space and time are dynamical, and in particular that they can evolve with time. When the space through which particles move is changing, the total energy of those particles is not conserved.
First, unlike with ordinary matter fields, there is no such thing as the density of gravitational energy. The thing you would like to define as the energy associated with the curvature of spacetime is not uniquely defined at every point in space.
So the best you can rigorously do is define the energy of the whole universe all at once, rather than talking about the energy of each separate piece. (You can sometimes talk approximately about the energy of different pieces, by imagining that they are isolated from the rest of the universe.) Even if you can define such a quantity, it’s much less useful than the notion of energy we have for matter fields.
The second reason is that the entire point of this exercise is to explain what’s going on in GR to people who aren’t familiar with the mathematical details of the theory. All of the experts agree on what’s happening; this is an issue of translation, not of physics.
And in my experience, saying “there’s energy in the gravitational field, but it’s negative, so it exactly cancels the energy you think is being gained in the matter fields” does not actually increase anyone’s understanding — it just quiets them down. Whereas if you say “in general relativity spacetime can give energy to matter, or absorb it from matter, so that the total energy simply isn’t conserved,” they might be surprised but I think most people do actually gain some understanding thereby.
 
@ACuriousMind that only makes sense with a British accent.
 
12:54 PM
@0celouvsky To my knowledge, John is British
@YashasSamaga see physics.stackexchange.com/q/7060/50583 and its many linked duplicates. It's a matter of some dispute, but the "mainstream" view, as far as I know, is simply that you don't have global conservation of energy because the expanding universe plainly doesn't have time-translation invariance.
 
I thought he was welsh
 
@0celouvsky Aren't the Welsh British, but not English? :P
 
Then I meant an English accent
 
Also, "British" is a weird-looking word.
 
12:58 PM
@ACuriousMind ahh how do I prove Fubini's theorem
 
@ACuriousMind What's the argument against not having a global conservation of energy?
What is preventing scientists from accepting it?
 
@YashasSamaga I think it is generally well-accepted you don't have it, but people like Philipp Gibbs dispute that.
 
@YashasSamaga you have to justify conservation of energy from scratch, why should you believe it to begin with
 
That's why I said that the mainstream view is that it's just not there
 

« first day (2337 days earlier)      last day (2578 days later) »