« first day (1573 days earlier)      last day (3160 days later) » 

1:09 PM
Two weeks until Rosh Hashana! Now's the time to tell everyone in your social networks to download Days of Awe - Mi Yodeya?. Handy shortlink: s.tk/miyodeya
3
 
 
3 hours later…
4:04 PM
Any search sleuths around?
I think this question has already been asked before but I can't find it — Daniel 5 mins ago
or maybe my brain made this up
but I seem to remember someone asking a question about lending a book to a non-Jew and them ruining it
or something like that
 
 
3 hours later…
7:08 PM
@msh210 I wrote this comment, but then I wanted to make sure I'm not wrong:
This answer is horrible. 10^18 is negligible compared to 10^24. All you've told me is that the non-Zodiac constellations are on the order of 10^24 and the Zodiac constellations are negligible. — Daniel 1 min ago
I'm not wrong, right?
@anybody else who likes math
 
@Daniel Right. To make this answer meaningful, it would have to somehow indicate that there are on the order of 1,000,000 non-Zodiac stars for every Zodiac star.
 
@IsaacMoses I was surprised that the answer had so many upvotes
that's why I was nervous that somehow my math was wrong
but the answer definitely seemed to be saying "we know that there are a lot of stars, and look how close chazal was to the huge number"
 
... also, the answer demonstrates nothing about the state of contemporaneous non-Jewish astronomy at the time that the Midrash was written. I suppose if it established that the scientific consensus at the time was that there are thousands of stars, then the Midrash saying that there are many times more than that could be said to be ahead of its times.
 
but really they weren't even close
@IsaacMoses true
and in fact, that's probably the case
 
 
2 hours later…
8:51 PM
@Daniel What @IsaacMoses said.
(Not that he needs my haskama. Just 'cause you asked me personally.)
 
9:26 PM
@IsaacMoses although 10^18 is closer to thousands than it is to 10^24
At least on a linear scale
But on a logarithmic scale, that's right
And that's probably how we should be talking about stars in the universe
 

« first day (1573 days earlier)      last day (3160 days later) »