@heather hi heather theres no rush on writing here, the room stays open 2wks without activity. learning involves tactical & strategic elements. theres an old quote by sun tzu on that. glad you are maintaining your interest. if you describe the symptoms of your code glitch, can give you hints. is anyone else in your school interested in coding? do encourage you to hook up with them. teachers/ other students etc... there are probably local clubs. what state did you say you were in again?
glad you liked the videos, just found em a few wks ago, delighted that there are few on collatz on youtube, am thinking there are probably other good ones out there, it would be fun to try to collect more... have long mused on an apparent connection between collatz problem & fractals & its great to see it fleshed out more. maybe the history of fractals needs to be rewritten a bit to include it... it looks like it was not realized to be fractal-like until relatively recently...
@vzn, I'm in Iowa. I think it would be cool for me to make a video about the Collatz conjecture - that would be fun. Yeah, a lot of my friends are nerds like me and interested in coding. There is robotics club but I'm not able to take part due to transportation constraints. I do have an engineering/robotics class second semester that I'm looking forward too. Yeah, the fractals connection is really interesting.
re m/f in CS, as you are presumably aware of, theres been a long gender disparity/ imbalance, have blogged on that, personally have not met many girls interested in CS/ math...
It all started when I was doing some number, 3 I think, on my paper in the middle of class and once it got to 16 I remember thinking how easy it was to get to 1. And then I thought further and realized, hey, it's because they are all even, and so you divide by two. And then I multiplied by two the other way and realized, hey, this is the sequence of powers of 2, with 1 being $2^0$! So all powers of 2 are automatically clear.
So then I was thinking further and I was like, ah, darn, how do you prove the inbetween numbers. And that's what I've been thinking about for a couple of days.
So then I was trying to look into other approaches. And I haven't been able to find many, I guess because people don't really publish failed proofs. So I was wondering if you had any pointers to help me get unstuck.
@heather exactly, all powers of 2 are "converging" and there are other sets of converging numbers, but nobody has found a pattern for all of them "yet"
@vzn, I saw your page. Is there a way to online compile ruby? I also wrote that python program and expanded it, and also a wolfram mathematica program.
@heather ruby is easy to install, yes think there may be a site that runs ruby online, trying to remember where that was, thought it worked for python code maybe...
@vzn, when I'm super excited about a topic, I spend hours on it. so I'll be glad to run all your programs. About Lagarias, he wrote a book but I could not find it for free online, sadly, so I probably will not be able to gain access to it.
But I will read his papers and whatever others I can find. =)
@heather lol just start by running one & dont get carried away to begin with, but thx for the great enthusiasm :P
there is another author that is coming to mind, douglas hofstadter, his books were some of the 1st read myself wrt CS etc as preteen possibly, they might engage you; many comp scientists have credited him as big influence.... CS can have an "alice in wonderland" flavor that he captured delightfully well...
just found this super streamlined function for collatz: $F(x) = \frac{3x + 1}{2^{m(3x+1)}}$ where m(x) is the number of factors of 2 contained in 3x+1. I had an idea surrounding this but I can't remember it now, I'll think about it. I'll have to look up Hofstadter, he sounds interesting.
have refd this problem myself in the blog as an interesting way of understanding collatz. take a look maybe, possibly/ apparently originated by hofstadter
The MU puzzle is a puzzle stated by Douglas Hofstadter and found in Gödel, Escher, Bach. As stated, it is an example of a Post canonical system and can be reformulated as a string rewriting system.
== The puzzle ==
Has the dog Buddha-nature? MU!
Suppose there are the symbols M, I, and U which can be combined to produce strings of symbols. The MU puzzle asks one to start with the "axiomatic" string MI and transform it into the string MU using in each step one of the following transformation rules:
== Solution ==
The puzzle's solution is no. It is impossible to change the string MI into...