« first day (908 days earlier)      last day (4103 days later) » 

11:49 AM
We say that Infinity is defined, yes?
I know Infinity is not a number, but this is a different concept to not being defined.
How can I convince someone that these concepts are different?
 
12:10 PM
How is 'defined' defined?
3
 
12:36 PM
I guess it requires some kinda circular argument?
 
12:57 PM
@UnkleRhaukus, haha how is defined defined
 
1:20 PM
@JonasTeuwen Good morning
 
@robjohn, i accepted your post
 
@user58512 I saw. Thanks. I found out that my previous method didn't work out as I'd thought.
 
I didn't find a book about convergence in the library today, wil have to look again tomorow
 
@user58512 The notation is just very hard to write down. Once the proper equations are shown, it is pretty simple.
 
@robjohn, Yeah, it's really hard to , you have to be so careful and everything is infinitely long - but it does work out perfectly.. like magic. any idea why Lambert thought to take continued fraction of sin(r)/cos(r)?
 
1:25 PM
@user58512 There is probably another approach that makes things more evident.
 
do you have any thoughts on this? mathoverflow.net/questions/42386/…
I want to reask it but if it didn't get answered there it probably wont here..
even if you just take 10 terms of the continued fraction, evaluating it at pi/2 gives you something around -10^10
why is that?
 
1:43 PM
@user58512 I don't see anything.
 
there
I asked it as a question
 
$$\frac{\pi }{1-\frac{\pi ^2}{3-\frac{\pi ^2}{5-\frac{\pi ^2}{7-\frac{\pi ^2}{9-\frac{\pi
^2}{11-\frac{\pi ^2}{13-\frac{\pi ^2}{15-\frac{\pi ^2}{17-\frac{\pi ^2}{19-\frac{\pi
^2}{21-\pi ^2}}}}}}}}}}}=1.6857393410602451374\times10^{-9}$$
 
yeah
why does it go to zero near pi?
 
Because $\tan(\pi)=0$
 
can we deduce thatfrom the continued fraction
I dont know what the relation is between tan and the continued fraction
 
2:00 PM
@user58512 Isn't that the continued fraction we just worked out?
 
user19161
Jonas doesn't seem to be coming back to chat, sad panda. Well, I hope he returns soon!
 
@JasonBourne Asaf followed the same pattern. Suspension then self-imposed exile.
 
All we've shown is that tan(r) = r/(1-r^2/(3-r^2/[a(r)/b(r)])) where a,b are some power series functions
for any finite depth
I don't know how to assign meaning to the continued fraction as an object in its own right
 
user19161
@robjohn I did not know what happened exactly a few hours ago, I may have misunderstood matters. Maybe Jonas didn't call anyone anything but there was a misreading, but never mind.
 
@user58512 Read up on continued fractions. Usually as a function of the very bottom terms, they don't vary much.
 
2:04 PM
that's true for simple continued fractions
 
I am used to working with simple continued fractions, but the same thing works with others.
 
eventually x will be dominated by the odd number in "odd - x^2/", so we have reason to believe this will work here too
@robjohn, check this out it is so funny cut-the-knot.org/wiki-math/…
 
@user58512 play with the quantity subtracted from the 21 and see what happens.
 
if you didn't see it already
 
Is there anybody having read Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid?
 
2:07 PM
@FrankScience, no, if you have a question about math from it maybe someone knows though
 
@user58512 I wonder whether it's worth buying.
 
I doubt it
 
@user58512 $x=\frac{2}{3-x}\Rightarrow x^2-3x+2=0\Rightarrow x=1\text{ or }x=2$ cute
 
hmm
oh the thing I linked!
 
@JasonBourne Yo.
 
user19161
2:15 PM
@OrangeHarvester Yes?
 
@JasonBourne Just pinging hi.
 
user19161
@OrangeHarvester Oh OK. I get many emails from SE users these days, which is a good thing. =)
 
@JasonBourne =)
Hehe, one of the restaurant is providing me a loyalty bonus till 31st Jan. 20% off. Must grab it soon.
 
user19161
@OrangeHarvester That is like a few days left.
 
@JasonBourne Yes. Four days worth of 20% free.
 
user19161
2:18 PM
@OrangeHarvester Well, if you don't like the food don't bother. It's just a trick to waste your money.
 
@JasonBourne Well, food is awesome. And anyway, I am going to eat somewhere, might as well be there.
 
user19161
Haha, I just answered a lhf, nobody wants to upvote it...
 
That's the way to go!
link?
 
user19161
math.stackexchange.com/questions/288921/… Here it is. Well, I guess we need to wait longer for votes to come in.
 
user19161
Some comments should be answers, and some are totally misleading.
 
2:22 PM
Ahh, I know squat about logic. :-)
 
user19161
Yes, I think so too. =)
 
user19161
But that question is just really trivial stuff.
 
@user58512 $$P_n(x)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty(-x^2)^k\dfrac{2^n(k+n)!/k!}{(2k+2n+1)!}=\left(\frac1x\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}‌​x}\right)^n\frac{\sin(x)}{x}$$
just for fun
 
cool!
 
off to the park
 
2:40 PM
Hello
Help me please, what is the easiest way to show that if $\deg f = n$ and $f$ is a local homeomorphism $S^1 \to S^1$ then $\mathop{\mathrm{card}} f^{-1}(x) = |n|$ for any $x$?
 
2:53 PM
Is there an example of a function that is defined everywhere, but is bounded nowhere (by which I mean, in no interval)?
 
@GregRos hmm, I think any non-continuous solution to f(a + b) = f(a) + f(b)
as any non-empty open set in $\mathbb{R}^2$ intersects the graph of such a function in a non-empty set
 
@GregRos Canway base 13 function is elementary.
 
@GregRos What do you mean, when you say defined? For example, if we consider $\tan x$ to be defined at $\pi/2$, then one of the solutions can be inverse of an indicator function over rationals.
 
@GregRos Another example here: $f(x)=n$ where $x=m/n, n>0$ and $\gcd(m,n)=1$, otherwise, $f(x)=0$.
 
@OrangeHarvester how can we consider tan defined there?
@FrankScience nice example
 
3:00 PM
@Tobias We cannot, but then I am wondering, if a function is defined everywhere, it has to be finite, and hence bounded. (I might be missing something.)
 
@OrangeHarvester see the examples just given
 
@Tobias Yes. That solves my doubt.
@FrankScience Nice example.
 
for a continuous function, we cannot do this of course
 
Thanks :)
I especially like the last one
 
yeah, that one is easy to describe and it has the same property I mentioned with intersecting open sets
 
3:02 PM
@Tobias I did not understand your solution.
 
@GregRos The first one is with intermediate value property but nowhere bounded. In fact, in each interval, the image is $\mathbb R$!!
 
@OrangeHarvester It was just an idea that might give an example
 
@Tobias Okay.
 
the non-continuous solution to that functional equation are very strange (and only exist due to AC)
in fact, the non-linear ones
 
Aha. Interesting.
Conway's base-13 is ingenious.
 
3:04 PM
Can you give an example? @Tobias
 
@GregRos as they require AC, no :)
 
@GregRos Suppose $\{\,e_1,e_2,\dotsc\,\}$ is a Hamel basis of $\mathbb R$, and consider $f\colon\,(r_1,r_2,\dotsc)\mapsto r_1$.
 
As far as I recall, they are related to ultra-filters on $\mathbb{R}$
 
At first, I doubted a function has intermediate value property if and only if it is the derivative of some differentiable function, but Canway's base-13 function just broke my illusion.
 
3:40 PM
Suppose one wants to prove that a finite $d$-dimensional vector space over $k$ has a unique topology. Suppose $e_1,\dots,e_n$ is a basis for $k$. Why on Earth would it suffice to show that any map $(\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n)\to \lambda_1 e_1+\cdots+\lambda_n e_n$, from $k^n\to V$, is a homeomorphism?
 
@EricGregor, homeomorphic bijection, no?
 
is the point that $V$ is homeomorphic to $k$, and there is a unique topology on $k$?
 
uh
did you get what I said about bijection
 
yes, it's a bijection
 
ok great
 
3:43 PM
@user58512 part of being a homeomorphism is being bijective
 
the bijection is immediate anyway
 
@EricGregor anyway, once you have a homeomorphism to a specific topological space, then clearly your original topology was "the same" as the one of that space
 
yes, i see now. i think i was being retarded. writing out the question makes me see that now...
 
I don't see how you could prove that though
 
by induction on dimension. can you see the one-dim case?
 
3:46 PM
@EricGregor I guess we need to fix a topology on the field to make sense of the question in the first place
 
we are assuming that $V$ is a topological vector space, so the vector space operations are continuous
that's a key assumption i should have noted
 
right, but there is not a unique way to put a topology on the field, so we need to fix that
 
i think the point is, as i think you noted, that the topology on $k$ is fixed from the start
 
right
 
and the point is that the topology is unique relative to the topology on $k$
 
3:48 PM
then it is clear in the dim 1 case
 
then you do quotient kind of arguments
 
4:07 PM
Is there an easier way of simplifying A+(B-(A-D))?
I feel like there should be, but my brain's on strike today >.<
 
A+B-A+D
 
seriously? WA in order to simplify that?
 
@Tobias If she needs a procedure, she could check the step-by-step thing.
 
buy mathematica for $6000 and do it
 
4:12 PM
If you can't simplify something like this, it means your brain needs a break
 
@GustavoBandeira Thanks, I'm bookmarking that site for later :)
 
go outside for a breath of fresh air before doing further work
 
@Tobias My equation isn't quite that simple... it actually looks more like SUM(F56:F72)+(F24-(SUM(F56:F72)-SUM(E56:E72))) and my brain is tired :)
 
as I said, if your brain is tired, take a short break before doing more
 
@Rachel I would make a little joke. XD
 
4:14 PM
a breath of fresh air and drink some cold water
 
@Tobias Then I'll forget where I'm at >.< I'm trying to automate an Excel report, and only have the final report data to go by. I don't have access to the actual person who knows the formulas for this report.
 
But I probably do need a break right now :)
 
A nice use for venn diagramms
 
Man, I can't wait for my Aeropress to arrive so I can make some proper coffee again. The machine here is just impossible to use for less than 10 cups, and I don't feel like paying for everyone else's coffee
 
4:25 PM
@GustavoBandeira I like cold coffee (and on occasions when I am feeling generous with whipped cream)
 
cold coffee?
I have never heard of such a thing
 
@user58512 iced coffee?
@Rachel I am copying your profile page about laziness etc. :P
 
Someone downoted my question.
0
Q: What are the theorems on the inevitability of some kind of order in large sets?

Gustavo BandeiraI've read Paulos' A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market: The problem is that if you look hard enough, you will always find some seemingly effective rule that resulted in large gains over a certain time span or within a certain sector. (In fact, inspired by the british econom...

But it's really not so dumb.
 
it's a good question
 
I know that Ramsey was one of the guys who developed it.
But the text say mathematicians over the last half century have proved a variety of theorems on the inevitability of some kind of order in large sets.
 
4:32 PM
In mathematics, the Szemerédi regularity lemma states that every large enough graph can be divided into subsets of about the same size so that the edges between different subsets behave almost randomly. introduced a weaker version of this lemma, restricted to bipartite graphs, in order to prove Szemerédi's theorem, and in he proved the full lemma. Extensions of the regularity method to hypergraphs were obtained by Rödl and his collaborators and Gowers. Formal statement of the regularity lemma The formal statement of Szemerédi's regularity lemma requires some definitions. Let G be a g...
 
So, I guess that other mathematicians also worked on something like that.
@user58512 You should post it as an answer.
 
4:45 PM
@OrangeHarvester lol sure, you're welcome to it. I wrote that originally in a response to a Programmers.SE question (now deleted) that was asking how that quote from Larry Wall applied to programmers, and liked it so kept it around :)
 
@Rachel Cool. :-) Copying/Stealing should also be included in that list. :-)
 
All I ask is if someone gets famous or makes money of something I said, be sure to give me proper credit ;)
 
will.do.so
 
5:05 PM
Hi
 
Hi
 
Hi
 
I wonder how to easily prove that $\lim_{s\to 0} \int_0^1 (\Gamma (x))^s\space\mathrm{dx}=1$
 
that looks really tough
oh wait, can't you just take s=0?
or does the integral diverge for all s>0?
I think the integral converges for all 0 <= s < 1, if you can show that you can just use s=0.. but that may be difficult....
 
5:15 PM
@user58512: $\int_0^1 (\Gamma (x)) \space\mathrm{dx}$ diverges ...
 
I keep typing s=1 instead of s=0 by accident
 
@user58512: hehe
Probably it wouldn't be bad to split the interval and then to use the uniform convergence.
 
 
1 hour later…
6:35 PM
hi
 
hi
 
I'm bored any thoughts?
 
do some math
 
do you know about irrational numbers?
 
know what about them?
 
6:50 PM
I want an overview of what's known about it
 
I don't think there is one unless you can be more specific
 
user19161
Ah, so many Rachels on SE. So far I have chatted with 3 of them.
 
user19161
@Rachel A+(B-(A-D))=A+(B-A+D)=A+B-A+D=A-A+B+D=0+B+D=B+D
 
user19161
Welcome back @jonas bro!
 
Hi.
@robjohn Good morning.
@JasonBourne Yes @WillJagy talked to me yesterday, I totally disagreed and then I slept and then a bit OK.
 
6:56 PM
@JonasTeuwen Hey there... later morning now, but still morning.
 
It is like 8PM.
 
@JonasTeuwen It's even later morning there :-)
 
I will start working on paintings now.
@robjohn Or very early...
 
@JonasTeuwen fingerpainting?
 
No, inverse scattering 8-))).
 
user19161
6:57 PM
Deep stuff bro.
 
Got contacted by a professor. Exciting stuff.
 
@JonasTeuwen perform an inversion map on the paint outside the can to get it back into the can
 
@robjohn 'I put your Rembrandt in the can!'. Was not so hard.
I think they'd kill me.
 
@JonasTeuwen ouch...
 
8-).
 
6:59 PM
@Tobias, what are the important methods and what theorems are known
 
@user58512 still, way too broad to have an answer
 
Must be a philosopher!
 
user19161
Today I answered 4 lhf and so far got 0,1,2,3 votes for them.
 
What is the complex conjuguate of a dirichlet character?
 
@Tobias, why
@Ethan, it's a group homomorphism so just negate the input
 
7:01 PM
@user58512 because the subject matter is too large
 
@Tobias, how can i get some idea about it then?
 
user19161
@Tobias If it is too large, we chop it up into disjoint union of intervals.
 
@user58512 by figuring out what particular type of things you are actually interested in
 
Can you say that slightly differently? I don't understand your terminology
 
@Ethan, why do you care about dirichlet characters?
 
user19161
7:03 PM
@user58512 That boy is the next Ramanujan dude!
 
@JonasTeuwen are you insulting people again? :-D
 
@robjohn Yes!
 
user19161
@robjohn Are you being sarcastic again?
 
user19161
I just got two more "ass" flags.
 
Little stars?
 
user19161
7:06 PM
So guys, remember. Let today be the NO USING ASS DAY.
 
user19161
Come on, people flag every little thing these days.
 
It's interesting how so very often in math people invent concepts to serve their intuition, and then realize that these concepts bring them to unintuitive conclusions.
 
user19161
Yes, that is because intuition is incomplete and imperfect, like life itself.
 
@Ethan, are you doing primes in arithmetic progressions?
 
Yes, so it is a good definition!
 
7:09 PM
@JasonBourne was that a cutting jest?
 
@robjohn I received a cute book today.
It is 'Distributions and operators' by Grubb.
I think you might like it too.
 
@JonasTeuwen is it available on amazon?
 
@user58512 Given some character modulo a if I sum that character over the values coprime to a less then a can that sum be given in terms of another number theoretic function
 
@robjohn I think it is, but I got it for 25$ as it was available on SpringerLink :-))).
 
I don't know
 
7:11 PM
@JonasTeuwen I was just looking at it on SpringerLink :-)
 
@robjohn Good.
I first found it while I was in a retirement address.
The dude was talking about ordinal numbered dimensions or what the hell.
 
@JonasTeuwen It looks nice. I see it deals with some $\psi$DO calculus...
but $70...
 
Very right dear Sir (that is why I linked it).
Oh?
 
eBook for $55
 
@robjohn Does the university you work at have access to SpringerLink (UCLA? They should).
 
7:13 PM
@JonasTeuwen That is how I am looking at SL
 
@JasonBourne I think what I take from it is that just because you have something in mind when you build something, doesn't mean what you had in mind and what you get are the same thing.
 
@robjohn Then you should be able to get it for 25$...
(printing on demand)
 
@JonasTeuwen how is that different from an eBook?
 
@robjohn I just... discovered that it is a woman.
@robjohn That it is printed and bound in a paperback?
But the ebook is also free when you have access to SL? So why buy.
You Sir, are making no sense.
"And it has no regularity."
That sentence is so full of doom doom.
 
@JonasTeuwen I see the "MyCopy Softcover Edition" for $25, but I don't see anything for free.
 
7:25 PM
@robjohn I've got that one!
That is to me only available when I can download the chapters in .pdf myself :-).
 
@JonasTeuwen The "myCopy" edition?
 
If you have never bought such a thing, I can make you a picture, it is quite decent quality.
Yes.
You get a paperback with colored cover (like the standard one) and laser printed pages.
All quite OK. I think it is a good deal for 25$ as it is a real book (and printing is not free either).
 
Ah, I see, the chapters are available individually in PDF online
 
@robjohn That is how I would get stuff from my university. I would download the individual chapters and then string them together using ghostscript or something.
 
@OrangeHarvester Yeah, it just took me a while to find the right page and realize that all the chapters were there.
 
7:30 PM
@robjohn Ahh, nice.
 
@JasonBourne Thanks, I knew it was something simple like that but I had been looking at numbers for far too long and my brain was on strike. It didn't help that I wasn't actually working in easy units like "A" or "B" :)
 
@JasonBourne I am back to Chromium for now. Mainly for memory footprint.
Firefox must have some incredibly bad memory leaks.
 
Hi everyone 1
 
@Theorem Hi
 
@OrangeHarvester wassup ?
 
7:36 PM
@robjohn But 25$ seems like they try to 'be a better publisher' with all the crap going on 8-)).
 
agreed.
@Theorem Nothing, want to do some problems on rings but can't.
 
@OrangeHarvester : hmm , sounds great .
 
@Theorem not really, not when you suck as much as I do. What are you doing?
 
Hey. Could anyone explain how I would find the gradient of a straight line with the equation 25x + 5y = 3 without telling me the answer? :) I worked it out to be -5. Is that correct?
 
@JoeyMorani What is the definition of a gradient?
 
7:39 PM
@JoeyMorani : u are right .
 
Gradient of a line on a graph.
Thanks! :)
 
@OrangeHarvester : i am going to start preparing for my quantum physics/ electrodynamics exam
 
@Theorem heh, nice. Quantum physics + electrodynamics in the same course?
or is it qed?
 
@OrangeHarvester : its not qed , but its sort of a packed course .
 
@Theorem i see.
 
7:47 PM
Why don't they just measure angles in circles.
E.g. 1/2 of a circle, 1/3 of a circle...
 
Pearls of reasoning: youtu.be/YGcLdzQeEck
 
@GregRos May be because of arc length parametrization.
 
@JonasTeuwen I got the PDF (463 pages in 3.7 MB)
 
@robjohn You're in piracy?
 
user19161
@Rachel We spoke before in the Eng room. I remember the Eng question you posted, about you and your boyfriend. Are you guys getting married soon?
 
7:53 PM
@robjohn Got it too.
@GustavoBandeira No, you can just download it.
 
@GustavoBandeira No. got it via SpringerLink
@JonasTeuwen I think there were some blank pages not in the PDFs... page viii for example
 
user19161
@GustavoBandeira I do view books in PDF before deciding whether to buy them or not.
 
user19161
It's not enough to check amazon and google books.
 
@robjohn Generally people remove blank pages from PDF to prevent the doubts of corruption. Else, blank pages in PDF have a notice, "intentionally left blank".
 
@robjohn There is no page viii 8-).
(in my book)
 
user19161
7:54 PM
@OrangeHarvester That is so silly.
 
@JonasTeuwen even in the print version?
 
@JasonBourne It is not!
 
Yes.
 
user19161
@OrangeHarvester It is. QED.
 
@JasonBourne It is not!
 
user19161
7:55 PM
@OrangeHarvester Sorry, I don't know quantum electrodynamics.
 
Our Queen become a King...
I do know some QED.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen Sex change?
 
@JasonBourne I think it is her son.
But that would be so ultimately Dutch, for the Dutch Queen to transform into a King.
 
user19161
Can I have some love for this post? math.stackexchange.com/a/288924/4594
 

« first day (908 days earlier)      last day (4103 days later) »