« first day (2211 days earlier)      last day (2800 days later) » 

4:15 AM
anyone there?
 
yes
 
 
3 hours later…
7:17 AM
@JasperLoy keep making videos, never stop :D, keep singing
 
 
2 hours later…
9:23 AM
Hi @DanielFischer.
 
@quid Terence Tao thinks the Hilbert Polya Conjecture is false. Or at least he questions it here youtube.com/watch?v=nXNvaTFhX1c at 23:25
3
 
@DanielFischer I learnt the Jensen's formula yesterday.
Essentially a generalization of Newton's formula, right?
 
@BalarkaSen Jensen as in counting zeros of holomorphic functions? Which of Newton's formulae?
 
That is, the last coefficient of a polynomial is product of it's zeroes.
 
9:30 AM
If the polynomial is monic (and we have a sign, $(-1)^{\deg p}$). Okay, and what has that to do with Jensen?
 
The version of Jensen I have in mind is $\log|f(0)| = \sum \log|z_k/r| + \frac1{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} \log|f(re^{i\theta})| d\theta$.
Where $z_k$ are the zeroes of $f$ inside a closed disk in the domain of holomorphicity of $f$.
If I let $f$ to be a polynomial, that tells me $|a_0| = |z_1 \cdots z_n|$ where $a_0$ is the last coefficient of the polynomial.
Is that a workable intuition for Jensen? How do you think about it? (I don't have a particular intuition for the term representing average of $\log|f(z)|$ over the circle of radius $r$)
 
Mmh, indeed, if you look at it that way, it is a generalisation of Newton's formula.
The average is the value of the solution of the Dircihlet problem at the centre. The solution of the Dirichlet problem is $\log \lvert f/B\rvert$, where $B$ is the (scaled for $r$) Blaschke product formed by the zeros of $f$.
 
9:53 AM
@DanielFischer Um, I am not sure if I understand that. By Dirichlet problem, you mean that extending functions on circles to harmonic functions on disks, yes? How does this relate to this?
 
user227867
@user1618033 I deleted all the videos, might make new and better ones in future. Today is my birthday.
 
Huy
10:09 AM
@JasperLoy: good to know. in a week, it's mine.
@BalarkaSen: how's it going?
 
user227867
@Huy I see. Good to know. I hope you become a great mathematician in future.
 
Huy
@JasperLoy: I hope I become a great teacher in the future
 
@BalarkaSen For the boundary values $\log \lvert f\rvert$ on the disk $\lvert z\rvert < r$. $\log \lvert f\rvert$ is subharmonic on that disk (harmonic if $f$ has no zeros there).
 
Huy
@JasperLoy do you just sing or also play instruments ?
 
user227867
@Huy I can't play any instruments. I also have no formal training in music. I just learn singing on my own, by listening to great singers and trying out different techniques.
 
Huy
10:21 AM
@JasperLoy: ever thought about practicing an instrument ?
 
user227867
@Huy Not really. Now I just hope to get well and do mathematics, and I also hope to find a girl to spend life with.
 
Huy
ok, good luck with that
 
@DanielFischer Ah, I see.
@Huy So-so. What about you?
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen: good, drinking coffee. gonna prepare some stuff for my 9th graders later today.
and do some more planning for my 11th graders
mostly optimise my linear algebra stuff
 
nice
 
Huy
10:29 AM
I threw out detailled discussion of rational functions from calculus
I hope that won't backfire
but I don't think I really use them anywhere else
 
I don't know many things to say about rational functions except the definition.
 
Huy
exactly
some teachers even told me they don't really discuss polynomial functions, but I think those I should keep
 
what do you discuss about polynomials? just curious.
 
Huy
just basics, how you can divide a root out, what the behaviour at roots is (according to multiplicity)
 
i see
 
Huy
10:32 AM
I like to do it because otherwise getting eigenvalues in R^3 would be quite painful
 
(derivative also helps you figure out multiplicity of roots, by the way, but i suppose you'll discuss that)
 
Huy
yes, that I know
btw, do you know of any use of the characteristic polynomial except that its roots are eigenvalues?
 
no, not really.
 
Huy
do you think I should ask on main later today when more Americans are up
I've been wondering this yesterday
couldn't come up with anything useful
 
sure
 
Huy
10:36 AM
I never remember: you did study linear algebra more or less already, right?
and analysis too, now?
 
Yes, I filled (and still filling) in the more fundamental things I didn't study.
 
Huy
good to know
 
But I am gathering rust on linear algebra because I am not really using it, although I know the theory.
Ted suggested doing some differential geometry might fix that.
 
Huy
I should revise basic physics
so I can come up with more examples
 
E.g., this didn't happen with point-set topology because I applied it frequently in the topology I learnt. Or the (multivariable) analysis/calculus I learnt because I am applying it in differential topology and the more advanced analysis I am learning right now.
@Huy basic physics is nice.
 
Huy
10:42 AM
I always hated basic physics
 
I am learning some of that for my 11th grade studies
 
Huy
I thought more advanced physics would become more rigorous so I studied some of it
only to be even more disappointed
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen: what book did you use to study linear algebra? Ted's?
 
No, Artin.
The first few chapters are all linear algebra and I think it's an excellent intro
 
10:49 AM
@JasperLoy HAPPY BIRTHDAY, JASPER!!!
 
user227867
@user1618033 Hehe.
 
@JasperLoy :D
@JasperLoy What presents did you receive? If you can share.
 
user227867
@user1618033 None. LOL
 
@JasperLoy :D
@JasperLoy Don't worry much about it, I have similar experience. :-)
 
user227867
@BalarkaSen I agree that Artin's book is excellent for both algebra and linear algebra. I often wish people know that some algebra books treat linear algebra too.
 
10:53 AM
@JasperLoy I create my own gifts, my mathematical stuff which no one could ever give them to me. So, I'm happy.
 
user227867
There is an excellent book, Algebra, by MacLane and Birkhoff in the AMS Chelsea series which covers both algebra and linear algebra as well.
 
user227867
I am going to eat dinner, bye.
 
user227867
@user1618033 Hey, you know my current email address right? mathematicsjasperloy at gmail dot com
 
@JasperLoy Yeap, thanks.
 
user227867
10:55 AM
@user1618033 Just in case I don't come to SE anymore. =)
 
@JasperLoy Sure. I'll let you know when my book is out.
 
user227867
@user1618033 Don't give up your dreams. =)
 
@JasperLoy That's my destiny. :D
 
11:07 AM
Is there a standard symbol for isotopy?
 
@Danu Not that I know.
Annoyingly, isotopy also means a lot of things.
 
12:05 PM
Can base conversion be done in sublinear time?
 
12:43 PM
@MatsGranvik thanks for this interesting information.
 
 
2 hours later…
 
2 hours later…
cap
4:49 PM
Hi, I have a question about probability notation. If $F$ is a distribution, what does $\overline{F}(x)$ stand for? Is it $P(X>x)$?
 
 
2 hours later…
7:01 PM
Ramanujan: These steps you want, what you want, I do not know how to do.
Hardy: Well, you can just begin by trying your best and see if you don't surprise yourself.
 
 
2 hours later…
8:38 PM
as a mthematicians, playing a musical instrument is necessary to harmonise one person's passion/feeling/willing with his work and practise
yes necessary
as einstein played on both piano and was a good violinist
@LeakyNun i suppose yes
 
@Agawa001 Then how?
 
well, it is easier from hexa-quatrenary-octal-hexa
 
I'm talking about regular base conversions
not those special cases
(and those special cases are still linear time)
 
hi chat
 
@Semiclassical The master is back
 
8:45 PM
riiight
 
there must be some tunnels from here and there, pay more time and see fantastic results
leeme check a blog i visited before
 
huh, that's weird. my icon is showing up next to these chat lines with a different color than in the room list
in the room list it's purple, but next to chat it's red.
and it's being inconsistent in a few other places, too
 
dunno i lost it sorry, some thing very impressive about linear jumping from bases
 
@Semiclassical Can base conversion be done in sublinear time?
 
no idea
one icon:
and the other:
 
8:54 PM
@Semiclassical sure you have ideas
 
not really. i've never had an algorithms course
so stuff like sublinear time etc. are entirely outside my realm of expertise or interest
 
@Semiclassical i guess identicons change with user parameters, so make sure you log using same ones
 
weird.
@MatsGranvik You could rework the conjecture in such a way to accommodate that, though making it precise is probably just as hard: Namely, that the Riemann zeros are equivalent to a system in the same universality class as a Hermitean operator. (Rather than being directly equivalent to some Hermitian operator.)
 

« first day (2211 days earlier)      last day (2800 days later) »