« first day (1674 days earlier)      last day (3339 days later) » 

12:01 AM
@MaryStar what happens to $x$ and $y$ for a constant $\theta$?
 
They are also constant, right? @DavidWheeler
 
No...because $r$ is not constant.
 
From the relation $\theta=\arctan (\frac{y}{x} )$, we have that $\arctan (\frac{y}{x} )$ is constant, right? But what else can we say? @DavidWheeler
 
Instead of thinking of $\theta$ as an arctan, think of it as an angle.
To simplify for the moment, ignore $z$, and just think of what points at a constant angle look like in $\Bbb R^2$
 
Also think about what it means for a variable to vary :-)
 
12:12 AM
For example, suppose $\theta = \pi/3$, what "shape" do we get as $r$ varies from $0$ to $+\infty$?
 
Does anybody know about harmonic motion (in Trig)
 
i suspect yes, but it's not entirely clear what you mean by that
 
to me right?
 
right
 
Ok.. Well I'm sure its really easy I just didnt really pay attention and its like way off of what we've learned and a very small part of trig that were learning
The first one is "Find a function s given by s(t) = a cos wt that models the displacement of the weight
 
12:16 AM
ahah, physics
 
and the information I get is s(0)=5in; P=1.5 sec
 
simple harmonic motion, yeah
 
ya.. I don't know physics or anything. Its just a small section of a chapter, only 2 homework problems so its not big.. I don't like it
so uh.. what would I do?
 
you should have some other piece of information, like the weight being initially at rest
 
Ya, only s(0) and the period
but nothing else
 
12:17 AM
well, what's the precise statement they make?
 
oh, initial position is s(0) so its 5in
 
actually, i need to go eat dinner. back in a bit
 
later pal
 
I think i have to figure out the amplitude and other information to get the equation
So.. amplitude (a) = 5 I think, then reverse the period to get omega to make the equation?
 
Is it maybe a line? @DavidWheeler @infinitesimal
 
12:25 AM
I don't know if I did it right but I think its $s(t)=5cos\frac{\pi}{0.75}t$
 
back. that works on the assumption that the weight was pulled 5 inches away from the spring, and then released at $t=0$
 
I think, the book said the initial was 5in
and then said try it at s(1)
 
in any case, the problem isn't solvable unless you make that assumption (so pretty much have to)
do you have any familiarity with derivatives? if so i can point out something neat in this context, but without that it'd only be a distraction
 
12:43 AM
Nope
 
:P I don't know much, its so tiny that I doubt it will even be on a test, or if it is it will just be like the problem I just did. Ill ask my friends when they get to school since they have a answer book I guess
Thank you though!
 
glad to help
 
@MaryStar Not quite-it's a ray (remember $r \geq 0$).
 
1:03 AM
@MikeMiller you might be amused to know that my script is working just fine over in the Crusader's room
 
Let's see what color/pattern my avatar has changed to today
 
still looks red to me
 
I guess there is a delay of some sort for chat
 
1:34 AM
@David: Only a ray in polar coordinates. She's having trouble understanding free variables ...
 
She said cylindrical...but, sorta the same
 
Sorta. It's not a ray in cylindrical. It's a half-plane.
 
yes, I know, but I was ignoring $z$.
 
That's exactly what is confusing her repeatedly. Please don't ignore $z$.
 
Argh...taken out of context.
 
1:38 AM
Teaching is hard work :D
 
A cylindrical tube is just (essentially) $S^1 \times \Bbb R$
 
LOL, you don't need to tell me :)
 
Slices through any plane $z = c$ are circles.
 
If you scroll up enough, you'll see that she doesn't understand that variables not appearing in equations are free rather than bound to be some constant that she picks (typically $0$).
 
She didn't even understand the effect of holding $\theta$ constant in a plane, she wanted to keeping computing $\arctan(y/x)$.
 
1:42 AM
I know :(
But there's a point where we need to tell people that they have to figure things out for themselves or get their teacher to help.
I know what (most) of my students don't understand because they come ask me. If they got perfect homeworks by getting people to do it here, then they'd fool themselves and fail the tests.
 
Yes, if you say $z =c$, for example, it's hard to see that you get a translate of the $xy$-plane
Because $x$ and $y$ aren't even mentioned
 
Once again, it's a question of free variables ...
Linear algebra certainly beats that into people.
 
Okay, so my avatar changed to green this time
 
mr eyeglasses, why are you so variable?
 
Am I the only one who gets randomized avatars every day?
 
1:46 AM
Mine's been the same since I got here ages ago. Maybe it's time for me to disappear :P
 
@ʙᴀᴅᴀᴛᴍᴀᴛʜ I have no idea
 
Every day around 8pm EST or so, my avatar changes
 
@TedShifrin Well you can't (easily) draw pictures here.
 
you don't change email addresses, do you, mr eyeglasses?
 
@TedShifrin No
I always use my school one
 
1:48 AM
One of many reasons this isn't the ideal way to teach, @David, except for symbolic manipulation (e.g., the way most people do algebra :D)
 
Well, I guess I will change it when I change schools
 
and the way some people do differential geometry, @Ted
 
are you casting stones at I, @Mike?
 
I am going to take differential geometry next semester
 
No, @Ted, at Peter.
 
1:49 AM
my students were drawing all sorts of pictures all over the board today, working on asymptotic curves and lines of curvature
hell, I teach ring and group theory with lots of pictures ... I'm just weird.
 
I learned from Milnor's Morse theory book almost everything that Peter had taught, but presented better :P
 
well, I have lots of pictures in my undergraduate notes, @Mike, but I draw more in class.
Jacob told me that Peter gives my notes as a reference in his undergraduate notes because he has no pictures and I have lots.
 
Haven't seen his undergraduate notes; can't comment.
 
I like mine better :) big surprise.
weird, mr eyeglasses, on my profile page it looks like you have to click and choose to actually change the picture.
 
@TedShifrin I get what you're saying, and I understand you had a notion of how to help her understand-frankly, I just gave up after a while.
 
1:53 AM
damnit, i was wondering when i left this comment...
 
well, there are a few people who come here for too much help, and I think we actually help most by not answering and telling them to figure it out for themselves.
Part of my unhappiness with the whole site is that there's too much just spoonfeeding of complete answers.
 
It's a weird problem to have-a lot of people come here seeking help, and what "they" think is help is "getting the answer", and what 'we" think is help is "getting them to understand how to get the answer"
 
@Mike: Well, I think it's appropriate to ask even the 10yr old, "Where did you get stuck?" and not just put the answer for him/her to copy.
The problem is that those of us who understand what teaching is form a minority here. And I get chewed out for having such narrow ideas of what teaching is.
 
@TedShifrin: I was wondering when I left it because I didn't leave it.
Different Mike Miller.
 
oh, the other Mike Miller :P
 
1:57 AM
Mike Miller trolled by Mike Miller
 
Other than @Hippa's creations, I think I'm still unique.
 
I have seen many people ask: "is my answer correct', wanting validation of their PROCESS by the RESULT.
 
Ted Shifrin is a less common name than Mike Miller, so you can get away with it that way, @Ted.
 
Yes, my students often get a correct answer the wrong way ....
 
I see things exactly the opposite-I'd rather know my process is right, even if my answer is wrong.
 
1:58 AM
There's a Stephen Miller coming here to speak on Monday.
 
Are you going to troll him, @Mike?
Of course, @David, and so would most of my students.
 
@Ted: It's not something I'm interested in attending. :P
 
Ah
There was an algebraic geometry talk today I would have liked to have gone to (Claire Voisin, a star), but I had a mob coming to office hours, so I couldn't.
 
Of course, at a more basic level, I don't care as passionately as some people do-there's very little at stake for me, personally.
 
@David: There's nothing at stake for me, other than trying to be a good person here. And I hope to influence a few people in knowledge and mathematical taste. @Mike is proof that I've failed :D
 
2:01 AM
Well you certainly deal with more students than I do. @TedShifrin
 
Ah, but I'm retiring in two months, @David.
Some of my students are jubilant :P
 
Ah, I certainly know Voisin's name. When I was thinking of doing algebraic geometry her book was going to be my summer project...
 
Yes, I was sad that I couldn't go, @Mike.
 
@TedShifrin Are you hard on the poor lil things?
 
@MikeMiller Are you going to Talbot in April
 
2:02 AM
Interesting, @Mike, my student/advisee who got into Wisconsin and Colorado (and was rejected by UCLA and Berkeley) is now being told that he might have a chance at StonyBrook. I really don't understand the game any more.
 
I considered applying but ended up not doing so.
 
Very, @David. I've been notorious for that for 36 years.
 
@Ted: You know I have no comprehension of it.
 
oh, probably including my years as a grad student, too, so more.
It just seems weirder than in my day or when I was advising students 20 years ago, @Mike.
 
Hello, class. This is your final exam. I'll be back next semester to let you know if you passed. Good luck!
 
2:04 AM
How does one gauge which PhD programs one has a chance of being accepted into?
 
I'm hoping some of my more clueless differential geometry students (who may have all C's in all their courses up to this) drop. Sadly, they shouldn't have gotten this far with a major.
 
Doesn't seem like one can, @ʙᴀᴅᴀᴛᴍᴀᴛʜ
 
A lot depends on the advanced GRE exam, mr eyeglasses, but my point is that it's become more or less a crapshoot.
 
PS: I think you should change your name. You're not bad at math. Don't ingrain that thought into yourself.
 
I have a question... Do orthogonal coordinates mean cartesian coordinates?
 
2:05 AM
No, @MaryStar.
Polar coordinates or cylindrical coordinates are orthogonal coordinates, too.
 
So should I just apply to every grad school that looks interesting? Because I was thinking to just not wasting my time applying to schools like Berkeley, UCLA, etc.
 
Cast a wide net and talk to your recommenders.
 
So far I only have one professor willing to write a recommendation :(
 
Well, some recommenders are not so helpful these days, @Mike, and you're seeing that even I — who want to be — turn out to have no clue.
Generally, mr eyeglasses, you should ask the ones who teach you the most advanced courses, even if you do slightly worse. Make sure you go to office hours and that they get to know you.
g'day, Committing.
 
@TedShifrin The issue is that a lot of my professors don't really like to bother with students
 
2:09 AM
@TedShifrin Why do you want them to drop?
@TedShifrin And hello!
 
@TedShifrin I found it at the following exercise I am looking at:

We are given the following point in cylindrical coordinates. Write it in orthogonal and spherical coordinates.
The point is $\left (2, \frac{\pi}{2}, -4\right )$.

I have done the following:

The cylindrical coordinates are of the form $(r, \theta , z)$, that are defined by $x=r \cos \theta , y=r \sin \theta , z=z$.

The orthogonal coordinates are of the form $(x, y, z)$.

$x=r \cos \theta=2 \cos \frac{\pi}{2}=0 , y=r \sin \theta =2 \sin \frac{\pi}{2}=2 , z=z=-4$
 
Because they can only get the most routine exercises with my helping on almost every step, @Committing, and they cannot seem to learn the definitions. A few got solid F's on the first exam, and the next exam and final are harder.
 
@TedShifrin You want them to drop for their benefit or the benefit of the other students(or both)?
(Or neither)
 
Hey y'all: quick question. How might I represent x*(x-1)*(x-2)*...*(x-n)?
 
I don't enjoy giving F's to students, @Committing, and I see very little likelihood of anything else. Even with one of my Honors advisees, who needs my class to graduate, I've begged him to come get help in office hours, and he doesn't.
 
2:11 AM
that seems like a great representation
 
@ConorO'Brien Big pi product
 
LOL @Mike
@MaryStar: I have no idea what 'orthogonal' means there. They should say cartesian.
 
Ok...
 
@TedShifrin An honors student who doesn't care???
 
Is there a popular month when applications to PhD programs are usually due by? (For the Fall semester)
 
2:13 AM
He cares, @Committing. I think there are some mental health issues, but I've told him every week that I'm here to help him. His homeworks are terrible (as if he tries only a half hour and gets 1 or 2 out of 5) and he failed the first exam.
 
@ConorO'Brien $\pi (x-n)$ and set your n?
 
Usually by mid-December, mr eyeglasses.
 
@Committingtoachallenge er... "set your n"?
 
That's bad, @Committing. You mean $$\prod_{j=0}^n (x-j).$$
 
@ConorO'Brien It was meant to be a hint :P
@TedShifrin It was meant to be a little hint haha(not the answer, and I don't have latex)
 
2:14 AM
Okay...there's 2 potential professors teaching classes I will take next semester, but I don't know if they'll be willing to write letters before the semester ends in late December
 
Your use of $n$ just made it confuzling, @Committing.
 
@TedShifrin Fair enough
 
@Committingtoachallenge OH Gotcha ;) something like $\prod _{a=n}^xa$?
 
Well, for many schools that's enough time, mr eyeglasses.
 
Oh whoops I just rendered the latex and yeah it looks like something else completely aha
 
2:15 AM
Plus little $\pi$ looked like number theory, not product, @Committing. But I'm done criticizing you ... for now :P
 
@TedShifrin $$\large\color{green}{\checkmark}$$
 
LOL
 
Someone was adding that to their answers, and I love it
 
@Ted Should I just try to impress those 2 professors during September, October, and November, and then ask them if they would write me letters by December?
 
I'll be back in 5 minutes if noone logs my computer out (>.< at uni)
 
2:18 AM
If you feel comfortable with them, mr eyeglasses, you should ask them for advice on applying altogether ... and ask if they'd be willing to write, as well.
 
Hello everyone. :)
 
heya @Clarinet
 
I thought it would be an issue if I asked a professor for a recommendation letter before they input final grades
 
well, it's only a problem if you bomb the final and they can't write a good letter, mr eyeglasses
 
But what if the final is after applications are due?
 
2:19 AM
Working on a complete career change. Been fishing and hoping for a bite!
 
I got a recommendation the quarter I applied from someone I met that quarter
 
well, some apps are definitely do beginning of January, mr eyeglasses. You need to start exploring for options ... and since you can't afford too many schools (it isn't cheap), you need to be wise about your choices.
 
We usually get our final grades by the beginning of January
 
You're becoming a fisherman, @Clarinet?
 
Lol. :P Nah, looking into statistics positions and am awaiting a grad school decision (M.S.). Saw my undergrad professors last Saturday. The whole Wisconsin situation is really hitting them hard.
 
2:22 AM
Well, if all the schools I apply to don't think I'm good enough for some sort of stipend (not expecting a fellowship obviously) then I don't think it will be worth it to go to grad school, I guess
 
Yes, @Clarinetist, much about this wonderful country is so disappointing these days.
Yes, mr eyeglasses, of course. You need to apply to schools where you'll have a good chance to get supported (so perhaps no top 25). But I meant that the applications themselves are not cheap. :(
 
@Ted I thought I could get application fee waivers
 
Most likely you will have to TA. Very few fellowships around.
I actually don't know how that works, mr eyeglasses. Perhaps you can. Do websites say what you have to do to qualify?
 
Yea, I found some and I meet the requirements
 
Awesome news.
 
2:29 AM
How can I tell which schools I have a shot at getting supported?
 
As I was saying earlier to @Mike, I don't read the game as well as I used to. But it depends on your grades, what courses you've taken, your GRE scores, and the content of your letters. So there are a lot of basic unknowns.
 
I highly recommend the Mathematics GRE Forums in your searching.
 
What Ted said. Professors who know you well can also help.
 
mr eyeglasses is less fortunate than you were in terms of "useful" professors, @AlexW
 
Oh really? :(
That may present other problems in the graduate applications process as far as letters go...
 
2:32 AM
Why the name mr. eyeglasses? Is this an old username?
Or the text is hard to read
 
yeah, we've been discussing that, @AlexW
 
So you need glasses
 
G'night, all!
 
no, his avatar used to look like eyeglasses (although Mike insists it was eyebrows)
night, @Conor
 
@ConorO'Brien Night
 
2:33 AM
He used to be ಠ_ಠ
 
@MikeMiller Ahhhh Nabla
 
the things curled up on top of the eyes are eyebrows
 
That's a tough spot. The application process is difficult enough as it is... it doesn't need to be made more difficult.
 
@TedShifrin when we were talking about "where we put the inverse" on change-of-basis -this is what I meant by what I do: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1176027/…
 
@MikeMiller LOL
 
2:33 AM
the eyes = eyeglasses :D
@David: To be honest, I don't recall the conversation :)
 
@Mike, just as you're stubborn about your bad syntax, I'm stubborn about mr eyeglasses. :)
 
@TedShifrin Well, memory is funny thing-some things stick, some don't
 
I have a lecturer who is also insanely intense in workload
 
2:36 AM
I'm old, @David. My brain is too cluttered :)
 
I am old too.
 
In hindsight, you usually end up liking such professors the most later on, @Committing.
no, Jasper, you're still a young'un.
 
alright, alright, I suppose me being only 53 gives me an unfair advantage
 
So it was just depressing, going back to WI to visit profs for the first time in about 9 months: every single one of them, it was all budget talks. :(
 
damn right, @David :)
 
2:36 AM
@TedShifrin He gave us a 6 question assignment due in 6 days today
With multiple parts each
 
Depends on how involved/hard the 6 questions are, @Committing. Could be horrific, or could be a few hours.
 
3
Q: The sum of orbit size of some element over the image of group "polynomial"

Paul Plummer$\DeclareMathOperator{\orb}{orb}$ Say I have a group "polynomial", $p$, on $S_n$, that is $p(x)=a_1 x^{\epsilon_1}...a_n x^{\epsilon_n}$ for all $x \in S_n$, fixed $a_i \in S_n$ and fixed $\epsilon_i \in \mathbb{Z}$. Let $p S_n$ be the image of the polynomial. Generally, I am looking for $$ X(S_n...

 
Ain't that the truth.
 
@Clarinetist srsly, f- money
 
If you want to say fuck, just say it. This is a free chat.
 
2:39 AM
@ABeautifulMind Not true, you can get banned(I have been[for saying s***])
 
well, the Board of Regents in my wonderful state has just decided (now that I'm retiring) that they will no longer provide secondary health insurance once I get on Medicare. That is just changing, policy not yet truly announced. Pfeh on politicians welching.
 
I do, but once I start, I'm afraid I'l never stop
 
@Committingtoachallenge So be it.
 
Not to mention that there are talks of removing tenure :/
 
I was banned for "bitch," as I recall. Used as a verb, not as a noun.
 
2:39 AM
@JasperLoy Hi
 
Incoming ban for Jasper I imagine :P
 
We have had post-tenure review for 20 years or so here to appease them. It has gotten rid of the most incompetent.
 
You can search the number of times I've said fuck in this room; it's highly nonzero.
 
Some advice on my question, or some upvotes so it get more attention, or a critique so I can make the question better would be appreciated.
 
Maybe they give me more leeway since I am mad.
 
2:40 AM
wt*, I got banned for S*** and you guys don't get banned for f***
 
It's bullshit sometimes, @Committingtoachallenge
 
One of my pet peeves is the unrelenting greed I see all around me. As if nothing had value BUT currency.
 
Like I said above.
 
Post-tenure review... hmm. I've never actually heard of that
 
Only the rich deserve human rights, didn't you know, @David?
 
2:42 AM
Do professors in the US say fuck in the classes usually?
 
NO, Jasper.
 
@TedShifrin Humans deserve human rights. It's practically a tautology.
 
I don't think so, unless they have a particular reason to...
 
But maybe they should start.
 
OK. I thought yours is a free country.
 
2:43 AM
I got called out on student evaluations many years ago for saying "damn." We live in the religious South.
 
@ABeautifulMind Right-wing propaganda
 
Needless to say, mine is a very unfree country, just one level above Muslim countries.
 
It's funny, @Ted. The research triangle is relatively progressive.
But go just a few miles out of it...
 
Yeah, @AlexW, one reason I'm returning to my home state, although it's full of plenty of conservatives and bigots, too.
 
Here in the army, we are not supposed to say fuck, but it is very common. So it is not too bad.
 
2:45 AM
@TedShifrin I'm surprised math doesn't get cut from your curriculum on the basis that you teach $\pi \neq 3$, contrary to scripture.
 
Alabama passed a bill declaring $\pi = 22/7$ some years ago.
 
@TedShifrin What is this?
 
our brilliant lawmakers, Jasper
 
oh, geez, don't get me started
 
I thought $\pi = 3$
 
2:48 AM
Now pi = Pizza.
 
@ABeautifulMind Haven't you read the internets? Everyone knows $\pi = 4$.
 
well, I'm gonna call it a night. You all take care. Keep me posted, mr eyeglasses.
 
Night @TedShifrin
 
Goodnight, @Ted.
 
Morning, @Ted
 
2:52 AM
I know a function from $\mathbb R $ to $\mathbb R$ restricted to $\mathbb Q$. Can there be more than one way to extend it to $\mathbb R$ so it is continuous?
Is there a name for this result?
 
@TheEmperorofIceCream No.
 
@TedShifrin Night!
 
@TheEmperorofIceCream Not under the usual (metric) topology. It's a consequence of the density of the rationals in the reals.
 
@TheEmperorofIceCream Take a sequence of rationals that converges to the real number. f(lim x_n)=lim f(x_n) by continuity.
@DavidWheeler Your answer is too hard for the OP, lol.
 
thanks jasper
 
2:55 AM
@ABeautifulMind what answer?
 
@DavidWheeler What you just said, lol.
 
It's like this-every real number has a rational number arbitrarily nearby.
 
Hi everyone!
 
continuity ensures preservation of nearness
lately, though, I've been having doubts about the ontological foundation of real numbers
 
How can I prove INT(CL(INT(CL(A))))=INT(CL(A))?
in any topology
 
3:03 AM
@TheEmperorofIceCream This is a very interesting question. I did it over a decade ago, lol. Prove that each is a subset of the other, lol.
 
I have a quick group theory question if anyone is interested... I'm trying to find how many distinct $a$ satisfy $a^{65} = 1$ in the cyclic group of order 52. I believe it is three: the element of order 13, the element of order 4, and the identity. Is this correct?
(I'm preparing for a test, and myself and a classmate have gotten ourselves confused...) :-)
 
Thanks, I think it also works if I switch CL for X-INT(X-A)
@anorton No
an element of order $4$ won't satisfy what you want.
Moreover the quantity of elements of order $n$ is not always one.
Try to prove there are $\varphi(n)$ elements of order $n$.
 
65 - 52 = 13, so every element of order 13, and plus the identity.
There is only one subgroup of order 13, so that accounts for all of them.
13, 12 elements of order 13, and 1 of order 1.
 
Oh! thanks. I can't believe I did that...
 
A cyclic group has one, and only on,e subgroup of each divisor of the order of the group.
If the divisor is prime, every non-identity element of that subgroup will have the same prime order.
In this case, if the generator of your cyclic group is $x$, then the powers of $x^4$ are the elements you seek. It's pretty easy to verify there's 13 of them (including $x^{52} = e$), and that the order of $x^{4k}$ is, in fact, 13, for $k = 1,2,\dots,12$
 
3:16 AM
That makes sense, thanks. For some reason, I wanted to extend the special case that we discussed in class (which was elements such that x^2 = 1) to the general problem of (x^a=1). In the former, there is a unique element of order 2; I forgot that it isn't always a unique element. (And why I wanted to include elements of order 4 I have no idea.)
:)
 
you knew that 52 = 13*4, you just forget which number went where.
 
^ yeah.
 
it's sort of tricky: cyclic groups are abelian, integer multiplication is abelian, but...divisibility is not.
so it matters which is the divisor, and which is the quotient-something often trips people up.
 
@ABeautifulMind INT(CL(INT(CL(A))))=INT(X-(INT(X-(CL(INT(A))))))=INT(X-(INT(X-(X-(INT(X-INT(A)))‌​))))=INT(X-INT(INT(X-INT(A))))=INT(X-INT(X-INT(A)))=INT(CL(X-INT(A)))=INT(CL(CL(A‌​)))=INT(CL(A))
 
The meta problem I'm having right now is that I'm in a number theory course where the professor likes group theory, so he takes the (ofttimes elegant) group-theoretic approach to prove problems in number theory.
But, I've forgotten way too much group theory since last semester! :)
 
3:20 AM
@anorton mine does that too
He proved the fundamental theorem of arithmetic from group theoretical point of view
 
@anorton thats awesome
 
Don't get me wrong--I really like it, and I think the group theory approaches are really insightful. It's just that when it comes time for me to prove something on my own, my group theory starts to fail. :P
 
I think for some people groups are "too little structure". They're more used to rings and fields.
 
3:55 AM
Studying groups is certainly usefull without asking more structure,
 
Bib
Can someone confirm for me that all finite index subgroups of $\mathbb{Z^n}$ are $(m\mathbb{Z})^n$? Or am I wrong?
 
@TheEmperorofIceCream Yes, it is, but the "looseness" of the structure makes some things "harder to prove"
 
4:21 AM
pin drops
 
4:35 AM
In what sense do you mean that, @Bib? Does $\langle (1,0), (0,2)\rangle$ count as your sort of thing? Does $\langle (1,1), (0,2)\rangle$?
There is nothing of the form $(n,0)$ with $n$ nonzero in the latter subgroup, but it's certainly finite index.
Wait, I lied.
$(2,0)$ is in it. But $\langle (2,0), (0,2) \rangle$ is not that subgroup. It's index four; that one is index 2.
 
Bib
I knew something was fishy!
 
The only subgroups of index 2 of the form $\langle (n,0), (0,m)\rangle$ are $(n=1, m=2)$ or $(n=2,m=1)$, and this is neither.
 
Bib
By "this", what do you mean?
 
$\langle (1,1), (0,2)\rangle$.
 
Bib
Oh, I see what you mean now.
So there are more subgroups of finite index.
 
4:41 AM
Right. Of course, quotient of such things are still of the form $\bigoplus \Bbb Z_{k_i}$ for some finite sequence of integers $k_i$ (by the classification of f.g.a.g.s).
 
Bib
f.g.a.g.s... you mean the special case of structure theorem?
 
no, he just wrote the first g by accident
I think it should be FTFGAG
Fundametal Theorem for Finitely Generated Abelian Groups
 
Bib
I suppose you could also refer to it as the classification of finitely generated abelian groups
 
I meant the second thing you said, @Bib
but as long as everyone knows what I meant, who cares :)
 
I read it as: fear the f- gag, which made absolutely NO sense
 
4:54 AM
are you suggesting that one should NOT fear the f-gag?
 
what is the f-gag?
 
something worth fearing to be sure
 
like 9-gag but R-rated?
 
@TheEmperorofIceCream insult a moderator, and find out :P
 
@PedroTamaroff = bad
 
4:57 AM
lol, nice knowing you
 
5:29 AM
Hi guys, how would I interpret {(x,y,z): x=7t-1, y=2-3t, z=t | t is real}? I know it's a set of lines, but I have to use this to check whether the set is a subspace of R^3.
 
you should see it as $(x,y,z) = (-1,2,0) + t(7,-3,1)$
 
Ahhh okay, I am familiar with that form, thank you!
So now I would check if the set of lines is closed under addition, scalar multiplication, and contains the zero vector for all real numbers t?
 
5:47 AM
Check to see if it has the 0-vector first-it's the easiest check.
And it's not a set of lines, it's the subspace $\langle (7,-3,1)\rangle$ translated (offset) by the vector (-1,2,0).
 
6:09 AM
@DavidWheeler Still not sleeping? I went out for lunch and a walk.
 
How are you @ABeautifulMind?
 
@infinitesimal So so. I may need to do certain things to get well, but I am not sure I have the courage to do them. I won't elaborate here, but you get the idea.
@infinitesimal It doesn't require me to walk naked in public, or to do anything illegal or dangerous, but lots of people will know that I am crazy if I do those things.
 
I see @ABeautifulMind
 
@infinitesimal Don't say just do them. Most people won't be able to do them. So either I must do them somehow or convince myself I don't have to do them.
@infinitesimal So I will wait till I have a very stable mind and then decide what to do, and if I have to do them, I pray for the strength to do them. This is mostly OCD related by the way.
 
Okay ...
... why wait @ABeautifulMind?
 
6:16 AM
@infinitesimal Well, because I cannot think clearly now.
@infinitesimal I know this all sounds very strange, but if you know everything that happened in my whole life, you would understand it, but it is not possible to describe that now.
 
"Clear" in what sense? @ABeautifulMind
 
@infinitesimal In the normal sense, lol.
 
I don't think the "normal" sense applies to mental illness, but I could be wrong :P @abe
 
@infinitesimal Maybe you are right. You asked a very difficult question.
 
I know pal @abe that's why I asked
Food for thought.
 
6:22 AM
@infinitesimal When you have OCD, you suffer tremendously from strange thoughts people don't understand, so they don't know you are suffering.
 
Sorry to interrupt, and I know I just asked a very similar question, but I was absent for a long time and am catching up now. How would I interpret {(x,y,z): x=s, y=s+t, z= -2s+2t | s,t are real}
 
I would interprete what is inside the braces as a set.
 
Oh I know that, I mean similar to the answer David Wheeler before.
 
@Howcan Write (x,y,z)=(s,s+t,-2s+2t) first.
 
@Howcan^
 
6:26 AM
@Howcan Then write that as s(1,1,-2)+t(0,1,2).
 
Ahhhhh okay it all makes sense now. Thanks so much!
Can't believe I didn't see that.
 
@Howcan This is a plane passing through the origin and spanned by (1,1,-2) and (0,1,2).
@Howcan Learn the technique and you can do all questions of this kind. This is a simple question which you should master.
 
Yeah I'm fine with proving that something is a subspace, I just completely missed class when we did things with lines, planes, etc... in that form. Thanks again!
 
@infinitesimal I am going to bed, good night.
 
Later pal
There's no need to apologize for interrupting @Howcan this is a math chatroom after all
:-)
 

« first day (1674 days earlier)      last day (3339 days later) »