« first day (1640 days earlier)      last day (2733 days later) » 

12:37 AM
Who uses v for frequency?
 
1:03 AM
@DHMO That's a $\nu$
 
@BernardMeurer oh, a Ξ½
lol, vee and nu look the same here
$\nu$ then
 
Yeah, it's a pain in the ass :p
 
 
5 hours later…
user228700
5:46 AM
Hello everyone :-) Riight...no one is here yet.
 
user228700
Well, I was wondering if anybody knows the formula for bond order, which does not involve MO theory.
 
6:20 AM
@Kaumudi I don't.
 
user228700
OK...
 
user228700
Also, hi! :-P
 
Hey. I'm just leaving to do some studying.
 
user228700
OK...
 
user228700
6:41 AM
I've a quick question about back bonding.
 
user228700
Is $\pi$ back bonding different from simply back bonding? Wikipedia (which contrasts with the definition given in my textbook) suggests this...
 
user228700
Wikipedia:
 
user228700
$\pi$ backbonding, also called $\pi$ backdonation, is a concept from Chemistry in which electrons move from an atomic orbital on one atom to a $\pi$* antibonding orbital on a $\pi$-acceptor ligand.
 
user228700
My textbook:
 
user228700
 
user228700
6:46 AM
So..?
 
11:51 AM
@Kaumudi I thought I told you before
 
12:07 PM
@Kaumudi pi backbonding is simply backbonding that occurs in a pi-type fashion. Nearly all the time, this is true. So for the most part, they are synonymous.
The term backbonding is most commonly seen in the context of transition metal complexes, which is what Wikipedia is describing.
The term I learnt to describe BF3 with is pΟ€-pΟ€ bonding, but you can just go with what your textbook says, it's nothing more than a choice of word.
Furthermore, the parallel between Wikipedia's description and the case of BF3 is quite strong: you have "backdonation" of fluorine pi-type lone pair into the empty pi-type 2p on boron.
 
user228700
12:28 PM
@DHMO Ah, yes, u did...
 
@Kaumudi my formula is based on the octet rule though
(8 x number of atoms - total outermost shell electron of each atom) / 2
 
user228700
@orthocresol Huh. What threw me off was the phrase "move from an atomic orbital to a $\pi*$ antibonding orbital.
 
user228700
@DHMO Yes, I remember ^.^
 
@Kaumudi nice
 
user228700
Hey, BTW, how do u manage to remember those many common names for organic compounds?
 
12:35 PM
hint: I don't
 
user228700
:?
 
user228700
Explain?
 
I mean
I don't remember many common names
 
user228700
OK...
 
user228700
Is anybody familiar with the concept of degree of unsaturation? (πŸ™)
 
12:42 PM
@Kaumudi here it is called the double bond equivalent
This site contains a formula
@Kaumudi but usually you can just the number of double bonds and the number of rings
 
user228700
The Wikipedia article wasn't helpful but that ^ is, thanks.
 
user228700
@DHMO Right, but my textbook gives the same formula so.
 
and a triple bond counts as 2 @Kaumudi
 
user228700
Yeah :/ Wtf is up with that? Also, the site says:
 
because you can make a triple bond into two double bonds without changing the number of atoms and electrons
 
user228700
12:51 PM
"For a compound to be saturated, there is one more hydrogen in a molecule when nitrogen is present."
 
user228700
But this is true only if the N atom comes in the middle.
 
e.g. $\ce{CH3-C#C-CH3}$ is $\ce{C4H6}$
and $\ce{CH2=CH-CH=CH2}$ is also $\ce{C4H6}$.
@Kaumudi no, the keyword is one more hydrogen
 
user228700
Actually, no, never mind about Nitrogen. It makes sense.
 
!!img/carbon suboxide
 
user228700
12:57 PM
@DHMO: ?
 
@Kaumudi ignore that
 
user228700
Ur equations didn't render...
 
6
A: MathJax in chat (ChatJax offshoot)

Martin - γƒžγƒΌγƒγƒ³Based on the same principle, this little bookmarklet loads cancel in addition to mhchem: javascript:(function(){if(window.MathJax===undefined){var%20script%20=%20document.createElement(%22script%22);script.type%20=%20%22text/javascript%22;script.src%20=%20%22http://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest...

 
user228700
Duuude.
 
???
 
user228700
1:02 PM
 
user228700
These are ur equations^
 
@Kaumudi did you use the right script?
just copy the one i sent you
the one in the answer section, not the question section
 
user228700
I use mobile. Doesn't \ce work while typing questions on SE?
 
it works in the main site
just not in chatrooms
 
user228700
Not on mobile either, apparently...
 
1:04 PM
apparently
@orthocresol may be able to help you with that
!!img/inorganic benzene
 
user228700
No problem. I was able to understand, for the most part...
 
@Kaumudi guess the following compound (don't look it up on the internet!):
 
user228700
?
 
!!img/Cc1c([N+](=O)[O-])cc([N+](=O)[O-])cc1[N+](=O)[O-]
 
1:06 PM
No result found.
 
oops
 
user228700
Huh.
 
wait a minute
!!img/Cc1c(N(=O)=O)cc(N(=O)=O)cc1N(=O)=O
 
@Kaumudi here. don't look it up on the internet!
 
user228700
1:10 PM
U want me to guess the name if this compound?
 
yes
systematic name is good
common name is better
 
user228700
Dunno the common name. Is the IUPAC name (been awhile since I did this) 1-methyl 2,4,6-nitro benzene?
 
not commas or spaces
and trinitro
 
user228700
Oh sh!t, yeah, trinitro.
 
user228700
So what's the common name and why did u want me to guess?
 
1:15 PM
@Kaumudi 1-methyl-2,4,6-trinitrobenzene
1-methylbenzene is also known as toluene
so this guy is 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene
2,4,6-trinitrotoluene -> tnt
 
user228700
Yeah, Idk how and where to put the commas and dashes. I'll be revising/learning anew (some parts) again in a bit.
 
user228700
@DHMO Ah, OK...
 
user228700
What was that little exercise for? To show me how u remember the common names?
 
no
it was just for fun
 
user228700
:-P Alright.
 
user228700
1:20 PM
U're most passionate about Chemistry?
 
mathematics
and physics
 
user228700
OK, cool.
 
1:40 PM
I don't know how to get MathJax on mobile chat.
 
1:50 PM
I don't know how to get MathJax on mobile chat.
 
You don't MathJax how to chat get on know mobile.
 
I chat how to mobile get MathJax on don't know.
 
2:25 PM
Seems like I have infinite power here.
 
@orthocresol that means your time is zero
 
Loong is away, Martin is away, jonsca does a lot of stuff but isn't here super often, and Manish is busy.
 
in other words, you have no time here
 
@orthocresol And infinite responsibility?
Any time now your back bends
 
@M.A.R. Infinite responsibility to suspend users
 
2:27 PM
That's not . . . THAT'S CHEATING
 
New feed items: "Multiple question about alkanes/alkenes" This doesn't look good...
 
@orthocresol those are questions that I often have, as a very beginner
 
@orthocresol It's so Schrodingery. One question but many questions.
 
@DHMO I don't mean to be rude, but beginner or not, there's no difference. Too broad is too broad.
On top of that, I'm fairly sure some have been answered here before.
 
@orthocresol what is broad? maybe it would be alright if we split it into 4 separate questions?
 
2:30 PM
You're a mod. Your rude button doesn't exist
 
the 1st question is broad though
the other questions are fine
 
@M.A.R. **** you
*#$&@#$&@#^$&@^$
$(($*!(#*@&$#@^&*@#$^!@)$(#)$(
wait what
The first question isn't even a question. You don't produce alkanes by some magic chemical reaction. You dig them out of the ground and separate them.
 
@orthocresol I actually don't know how to answer q3
could you answer it here?
 
15
Q: Are long Oxygen molecules possible?

Cano64Are large oxygen containing molecules possible? Either large rings, or chains with hydrogen atoms at the ends. Like this: $\ce{H-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-O-... -O-O-O-O-O-H}$

33
Q: Why does Sulphur, but not Oxygen, catenate?

ManishEarthOxygen is a rather boring element. It has only two allotropes, Oxygen and Ozone. Oxygen has a double bond, and Ozone has a delocalised cloud, giving rise to two "1.5 bonds". On the other hand, Sulphur has many stable allotropes, and a bunch of unstable ones as well. The variety of allotropes,...

 
thanks
 
2:39 PM
Ok, time to commence cleanup of mhchem in titles.
 
@orthocresol Hey, what is wrong with sulphur?
 
IUPAC uses sulfur.
 
@orthocresol Yawn
 
@orthocresol what.... it's a language difference
 
@orthocresol And neither S not O should be capitalized.
 
2:41 PM
@M.A.R. Yes, I fixed all of that.
 
Damn. You're too good.
 
CO2 is called dioxyde de carbone in French
 
You would've been a seal god if you liked ice cream as much as ice cream deserves to be loved.
 
@DHMO Sulfur is not used widely in UK anymore.
 
@DHMO Thank you for this information. Now I can conquer the world with it.
 
2:43 PM
@M.A.R. I'm just saying you can't force every name to conform to the English IUPAC rules used in a specific region
@orthocresol alright
 
IUPAC rules don't apply only to America.
 
@DHMO IUPAC is global.
 
so French must use the name "carbon dioxide" instead of "dioxyde de carbone"?
 
What sort of argument is that, that's a different language altogether.
 
so is American English and British English different
 
2:45 PM
@DHMO No.
 
Last I checked, there's no language called American English. Only English.
I have no issue if anybody wants to use -ize or color.
 
@orthocresol alright
 
But I will correct sulphur to sulfur and aluminum to aluminium.
 
Aluminium
ALUMINIUM
ALLLLUUUUUUUMINNNUMMMM
 
Not recognised as a word.
 
2:47 PM
I sincerely apologise for my transgressions.
Aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum aluminum alu
If you trash the message, that's a cheap shot.
 
@M.A.R. If I were him, I would edit the message
@orthocresol Canada uses both sulfur and sulphur
 
@DHMO IUPAC only uses 'sulfur'.
 
@M.A.R. source?
 
@orthocresol source above claims that "aluminum" is accepted in IUPAC
 
2:58 PM
IUPAC notes "The alternative spelling β€˜aluminum’ is commonly used."
 
IUPAC forbids sulphur
but does not ban aluminum
 
@DHMO Your point being? Why is it better not to use the alternative spelling?
 
Aluminium is correct-er.
 
@M.A.R. my point being there is no point correcting posts containing "aluminum" to "aluminium" if IUPAC accepts it
 
Call it style if you prefer.
 
3:01 PM
@DHMO There is some point.
 
@M.A.R. such as?
 
This isn't 'realize' vs. 'realise'. That would be pointless.
In this case, one spelling is superior.
'cause it's preferred.
 
@M.A.R. do you go around correcting ethanoic acid to acetic acid, if that is preferred?
 
See DHMO, I have better things to do than argue semantics that has no use. If you want, you can argue with chemobot.
 
@orthocresol do you go around correcting ethanoic acid to acetic acid, if that is preferred?
 
3:03 PM
I'm certain he's obedient and listens carefully to all your arguments.
 
user228700
4:02 PM
@orthocresol U think it'll ever be possible? Been struggling :'-(
 
4:26 PM
o/
 
5:11 PM
Hollo
 
0
Q: Why would breathing pure oxygen be a bad idea?

Aaron AbrahamMy textbook mentions that SCUBA tanks often contain a mixture of oxygen and nitrogen along with some helium which serves as a diluent. Now as I remember it, divers take care not to surface too quickly because it results in 'the Bends', which involves the formation of nitrogen bubbles in the blo...

Any ideas people?
 
Oxygen toxicity is a condition resulting from the harmful effects of breathing molecular oxygen (O 2) at increased partial pressures. It is also known as oxygen toxicity syndrome, oxygen intoxication, and oxygen poisoning. Historically, the central nervous system condition was called the Paul Bert effect, and the pulmonary condition the Lorrain Smith effect, after the researchers who pioneered its discovery and description in the late 19th century. Severe cases can result in cell damage and death, with effects most often seen in the central nervous system, lungs and eyes. Oxygen toxicity is a concern...
This is a quality article
There is a "underwater" paragraph en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_toxicity#Underwater :)
If you have troubles with to much information put the article into NVivo software ^^
 
Anonymous
Can someone help with a thermochemistry doubt here ?
 
Anonymous
1
Q: What is the correct definition of Hydration Enthalpy and why is it always negative?

S007The first definition of hydration enthalpy I found on the net is : The hydration enthalpy is the enthalpy change when $1$ mole of gaseous ions dissolve in sufficient water to give an infinitely dilute solution. Hydration enthalpies are always negative. Another definition I found in a b...

 
5:34 PM
Well that is a bit complicated
But the statement is true ^^
 
user116211
@ortho, The uncertainty principle post izz butiful; +1.
 
user116211
It's thrilling to dig your posts ;)
 
user116211
I also wrote a detailed post on Uncertainty Principle right from the scratch - from Lagrange Brackets and canonical transformations. but that's another point.
 
@S007 $$\Delta H_{hydr} = \Delta_G U + \Delta H_{hydr} (cation)+ \Delta H_{hydr} (anion)\$$
$\Delta H_{hydr} = \Delta_G U + \Delta H_{hydr} (cation)+ \Delta H_{hydr} (anion)$
I have not a really good proof but it could something like this
 
user116211
@9-BBN Horror
 
user116211
5:42 PM
use \textrm.
 
@MAFIA36790 why ?
@MAFIA36790 do it for me ;)
 
user116211
okay; wait...
 
user116211
$$\Delta H_\textrm{hydr} = \Delta_G U + \Delta H_\textrm{hydr}~{\rm (cation)}+ \Delta H_\textrm{hydr}~{\rm (anion)}$$
 
user116211
@M.A.R. o/
 
\o
@AaronAbraham IIRC it's related to gas physics
Oh wait.
Yeah, that's your second paragraph.
Isn't pure oxygen too dense?
@AaronAbraham I found the answer. Posting.
 
user116211
5:54 PM
WoW! Long day frustrated with Physics reviews; here comes Chem's very own HW:
 
user116211
0
Q: limiting Reagent Summary sheett

john Smithsilver (1) sulfide with hydroelectric acid to form silver (1) chloride and dihdrogen sulfide. In one reaction 30 of silver (1) sulfide reacts with 10 grams of hydrochloric acid write balanced equation 2) determine limiting reagent 2a) convert reactant silver (1) sulfide to moles and then to a...

 
@MAFIA36790 Limiting reagent summary shit
 
user116211
Don't insult this valid question.
 
user116211
I've upvoted; so should you.
 
6:15 PM
Can someone write the HW comment for me?
 
user116211
!!greet/@nworb99
 
Welcome to The Periodic Table @nworb99! Here are our chat guidelines and it's recommended that you read them. If you want to turn Mathjax on, follow the instructions in this answer. Happy chatting!
 
user116211
@orthocresol What comment?
 
Nvm, I've done it.
 
@MAFIA36790 hey thanks for the community wiki thing instructions, and the greeting as well
didn't realize the question was already being discussed here, too, whoops
 
user116211
6:20 PM
sure; that's my job as a responsible user here.
 
Welcome to The Periodic Table @nworb99! Here are our chat guidelines and it's recommended that you read them. If you want to turn Mathjax on, follow the instructions in this answer. Happy chatting!
 
user116211
@chem you okay?
 
user116211
._.
 
user116211
@hippa Halp!!
 
@MAFIA36790 O_o
 
6:25 PM
I suppose I should take that as flattering...?
 
!!test
 
edited !
 
!!greet/@nwor
 
Welcome to The Periodic Table @nwor! Here are our chat guidelines and it's recommended that you read them. If you want to turn Mathjax on, follow the instructions in this answer. Happy chatting!
 
Oh, Maf did it already.
Welcome to chat anyway.
 
6:26 PM
third time's the charm
thanks!
 
The second time doesn't count though.
That was chemobot becoming sentient.
1
A: Why would breathing pure oxygen be a bad idea?

M.A.R.Our body is used to the environment around us. Once you change part of the environment, you have to be ready for the consequences. Inhaling pure oxygen is the cause for what is known as oxygen toxicity. Oxygen toxicity is a condition resulting from the harmful effects of breathing molecular...

 
touche
 
user116211
Is @Chemobot Ultron?
 
I wouldn't have posted an answer if I knew you already have.
But mine uses correct Wikipedia-style citation, so it's obvious SUPERIOR.
Bow down to my answer.
Like, right now.
 
!!bow_down
 
user116211
6:28 PM
downvoting...
 
@MAFIA36790 Don't be a devil's advocate
@MAFIA36790 Hey no fair
I used a pretty picture too
 
user116211
Oh @M.A.R.; last night the h bar got muted for 5 mins.
 
@MAFIA36790 Why?
Ocleo rampaging again or something?
 
user116211
Some user was flagging things continuously.
 
Or was Trump vs. Clinton getting too hot?
 
user116211
6:30 PM
@M.A.R. yes...
 
user116211
@M.A.R. yes, yes....
 
@MAFIA36790 That's an unfortunately familiar scene.
 
user116211
Our mod talked with him; but I don't think he got affected at all ;)
 
Of course he didn't
And of course it's always a he.
 
user116211
He is over-sensitive? Maybe ;)
 
user116211
6:33 PM
He jokes often about flagging; but sometimes it's bothering.
 
user116211
He doesn't take it seriously.
 
user116211
Anyways, I don't like politics talking in any room, especially the h bar.
 
user116211
ARTofCode mentioned that they inactivated another chatroom for too much political arguments.
 
CardOfOat is one of the regular mods of chat.
 
user116211
in The h Bar, 22 hours ago, by MAFIA36790
@MetaEd He is the Grim Reaper here. We really fear him a lot.
 
6:38 PM
Who?
 
user116211
@M.A.R. ARTofCode.
 
And MetaEd in h bar?
@MAFIA36790 Well, he's as old as me, so there.
FEAR ME MERE OLDER AND YOUNGER MORTALS
 
user116211
@M.A.R. yeh; and now he comes there for routine check up.
 
@MAFIA36790 It's just one day, get over it.
You're lucky Shog isn't watching you.
 
user116211
@M.A.R. flagging as against democracy.
 
user116211
6:41 PM
@M.A.R. I would love one day to talk with him.
 
@MAFIA36790 Well, he sometimes chats in the Tavern.
He's just a really wise man.
 
user116211
okay.
 
yako.
 
user116211
Anyways, I'm off from chat now; bye @M.A.R. and all.
 
\o
 
6:44 PM
bon voyage
 
Bye
 
7:31 PM
@Vedant please pay attention when you're editing. If you leave important problems with the post, I will reject the edit.
Edits shouldn't be trivial.
Esp. edits from users with less than 2k rep.
 
7:56 PM
Thought about this answer?
0
A: What is the chemical structure of ceramic nonstick coating on pans?

KMoyThere are MANY different types of ceramics and thus many different chemical formulas and structures. However, most have an oxide, nitride, or carbide ina crystalline structure. Referring to chemical structure, however, would include combinations of both ionic and covalent bonds, which are deter...

 
8:11 PM
Hey @Jon
 
Greetings. :) Anyone see Loong around?
He doesn't seem to be pingable in here
(I'm usually not, so that isn't surprising)
 
@jonsca He was travelling to London or Brussels or something
Apparently London doesn't have internet.
 
Ah. All I needed to know! Thanks
 
Oct 11 at 11:47, by Martin - γƒžγƒΌγƒγƒ³
> Does the internetz exists in london and BRUSSels? Urgent halp plz!
@jonsca BWAAHHA, NOW WE CAN FREELY PING YOU FOR THE NEXT SEVEN DAYS
I'll make Ortho do it so I won't get suspended
 
:D
 
8:14 PM
@Jon BTW, is the mod room ever active?
Chem's mod room, I mean
 
 
1 hour later…
9:18 PM
@M.A.R. No. It's been frozen for a year already...
 

« first day (1640 days earlier)      last day (2733 days later) »