In a similar approach of slhck's problem I thought that being very descriptive instead of just clicking not an answer would help, but instead I got the weirdest flag reason returned:
What is so hard to understand about my flag reason?
The rejection reason makes no sense at all, because my fla...
@TomWijsman Hmm. First of all I agree that the answer should probably be a comment because it's not really great or anything. Yours is much better.
Still, I believe the difference between the problems I had with my flags and yours is that in my cases, the OP had always specifically ruled out some answers before.
> Funny how high reputation users (not just me, as shown by the other meta question) are treated these days by some moderators... – Tom Wijsman 48 mins ago
I don't think that makes for a construcive discussion though
I really think the whole thing here is an edge case. Some will see the mention of IPv6 adapter as something new, others (to whom this is obvious), won't.
I don't get though why this answer was upvoted so much.
When I am flagging answers I read
This was posted as an answer, but it does not answer the question. It should possibly be an edit, a comment, another question, or deleted altogether.
This is very broad and does not say when an answer is eligible to (or should) be flagged.
Usually, this le...
In a similar approach of slhck's problem I thought that being very descriptive instead of just clicking not an answer would help, but instead I got the weirdest flag reason returned:
What is so hard to understand about my flag reason?
The rejection reason makes no sense at all, because my fla...
