« first day (1570 days earlier)      last day (3367 days later) » 

12:35 AM
BTW don't you think, that should be rather a synonym to general, but not existing or perhaps even more general ? There are many related questions and there is a lack of good tag for them. For example: unix.stackexchange.com/questions/31161/… or unix.stackexchange.com/questions/81224/… . The first one tagged with (!?)
 
 
10 hours later…
10:31 AM
@Gilles nevermind, I am too tired to care. Anyway, I was reading your answer here unix.stackexchange.com/questions/986/… and couldn't believe it.....suddenly felt like I knew so little....and here I was feeling proud just for knowing how to use the essentials of vim! So much more to learn....
 
 
7 hours later…
5:16 PM
@Aerovistae if you want to learn more about vi/vim... area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/80441/vi-and-vim (and there isn't even a referrer code in there this time!)
 
 
3 hours later…
8:02 PM
Approximately 11 to go on the proposal. Assuming TBTB are shooting for 200. The finish is in sight.
Can someone suggest a way to count the number of \refs in a LaTeX document?
 
Yes, and if you needed a more accurate count, I guess you could redefine \ref to increment a counter
BRB, going to restart Chromium to upgrade to 40, and hopefully have a working compose key here too!
Does it compose—? YES
 
@derobert More accurate count?
 
8:18 PM
@FaheemMitha depends: do you care about \ref commands that are commented out? \ref commands that are invoked by another command?
@derobert did you try GTK_IM_MODULE=xim google-chrome?
 
@Gilles Yes, that's set in my X startup scripts...
 
@Gilles No as regards the former. I don't think I have any of the latter. But I take your point. I suppose \refs could come from an inserted piece of text, too.
 
8:31 PM
@FaheemMitha: if you don't care about which \refs: wc
 
9:07 PM
Blizzard!
 
@AaronHall ?
 
I'm having a snow-afternoon (home from work early) thanks to the weather. :)
 
@AaronHall Ah. New York State? I guess it is that snow time of year.
Oh, New York City?
 
Brooklyn, to be precise. But I think the Blizzard is hitting the entire Eastern sea-board.
 
@AaronHall Ah. Worse than usual, is it?
 
9:16 PM
It hasn't really snowed all winter, it seems.
 
@AaronHall Oh, really? I thought snow was becoming more of a problem on the East Coast. Wasn't the area hit really hard a couple of years ago?
 
Hurricane Sandy? That wasn't snow.
 
@FaheemMitha if the snowfall totals through tomorrow night pan out, the best word to describe this storm is "historic"
12-24" in manhattan and boston has the potential to see 2-3 feet
combined with strong winds it'll be a mess
 
9:49 PM
@casey That's a lot.
@AaronHall Yes, maybe that one. What was it then? High winds and rain?
@casey are you being hit by it too?
You're in PA, right?
 
@FaheemMitha I suspect you are either trolling me or you don't know what a hurricane is.
 
@AaronHall Not the former. As far the latter, I've never been in one, so wind/rain. yes/no?
 
Hurricane Sandy (also unofficially known as "Superstorm Sandy") was the deadliest and most destructive hurricane of the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season, as well as the second-costliest hurricane in United States history. Classified as the eighteenth named storm, tenth hurricane and second major hurricane of the year, Sandy was a Category 3 storm at its peak intensity when it made landfall in Cuba. While it was a Category 2 storm off the coast of the Northeastern United States, the storm became the largest Atlantic hurricane on record (as measured by diameter, with winds spanning 1,100 miles (1,800...
 
10:10 PM
So wind/rain yes.
 
don't you get "monzon"'s @faheem?
 
@FaheemMitha; like monsoon, but freezing cold and
higher wind speeds...
@Braiam: great minds etc...
 
yeah
 
10:34 PM
@Braiam we do. And it's monsoon.
 
10:57 PM
Nasty business. Lots of water. But without it the Indian economy would collapse in short order and tens, of not hundreds, of millions would starve.
 
11:18 PM
I've just reviewed 6 months(!) old post: unix.stackexchange.com/review/low-quality-posts/76354 How does this review mechanism work?
someone just marked them today or what?
 
11:37 PM
@jimmij forget about the age, are they good post "right now"?
 

« first day (1570 days earlier)      last day (3367 days later) »