« first day (1419 days earlier)      last day (3407 days later) » 

7:01 PM
@Geobits this Mathematica answer is a bit dangerous: FromDigits["MMXIV", "Roman"] ... but I don't think there's a way to get rid of the I.
(without it showing up in the output)
 
@Sp3000 I'm sure codegolf.stackexchange.com/a/42318/31625 will work
(My pyth answer from there does ;) )
 
Ahaha :P
 
Yeah you can do 2016-1
 
Exploiting the 2014 in the question eh, nice
 
Then presumably dump the rest
 
7:02 PM
I'm sure there's shorter than a whooping 84 though, surely :P
 
@Martin Well you know Mathematica better than I do for sure ;)
 
hi all
 
does anyone know if there is SE for questions about wireless networking, how to wire a house for networking and things like that?
sorry to ask but you are my source for all information :)
 
Now you have a worst case though :)
 
7:03 PM
@Lembik I think there are several where that could be on topic
 
oh cool
 
one sec
 
thanks!
 
nope
the on-topic page starts with
"(Note: All questions about RESIDENTIAL/HOME networking and CONSUMER-grade equipment, are explicitly OFF-topic.)"
 
7:05 PM
Yeah I thought that might be the case
 
@MartinBüttner ah. this is entirely residential
 
hm maybe also overkill
 
I am not sure they are nerdy enough :)
I want people with an opinion about handover between wireless networks, for example
or however you are meant to get wireless coverage for a large house
 
0
Q: Where do I connect the C wire in my furnace?

NathanI am upgrading my thermostat to a Nest, and would like to add a common wire. My current furnace controller doesn't have a C terminal, but the current thermostat wire has 2 unused wires (black and blue) what's the best way to do this? On the 24V side of the transformer there is: 1 Red Wire ...

 
@Lembik clearly lifehacks.SE
 
7:08 PM
If they allow that I assume your question will be ok?
Oh wait, they seem to specifically want physical wires :/
 
print 2015;i=" i;i+=;exec*" Hah. 26 bytes.
 
:o
What's that from?
Looks like print even numbers 1-100?
 
:P that was fast
 
apparently, people are liking my writing - codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/40376/…
 
7:23 PM
o.O
 
also, if calvin comes back and accepts an answer on that question, I get a badge!
 
he actually does sometimes
(accept answers on old questions)
 
well he said in the question that he will
and he would have if he did not go missing
 
If we get OCaml up to 10 votes a lot of people would get badges :D
(A lot being... 5)
Oh wait this isn't ASCII, it's most answers not last isn't it
 
why ocaml ?
which question ?
 
7:28 PM
On Hello World. I mixed it up with 95 ASCII though
Basically I mean if Calvin accepts a 10-upvote answer 5 people would get Populist :P
 
no
only the highest one gets
 
...
Nevermind!
Completely ignore what I've said in the past 2 minutes
:P
 
:D
rm -rf
 
@FryAmTheEggman You're recently starred comment demonstrates the same kind of grammar mistake that this sentence does.
 
I think it also has another mistake, this sentence is an example of that
 
7:37 PM
I know it should be it's :P
And that there should be a period :P
 
:P
 
Here's a fun grammar problem: "The're are three errors in these sentence."
 
one is "The're", one is "these", and one is "three"
 
I used to hate those type of problems in grade school. I would come up with a perfectly valid sentence, and the answer was totally reversed.
 
7:39 PM
but the third one isn't grammar
 
Because two wrongs make a right, it's impossible to know right from wrong.
 
3 left make a right, so 3 lefts = 2 wrongs
left is 2/3 wrong
this silliness reminds me
 
UPS actually follows that philosophy.
They drive longer routes to avoid left turns.
 
have any of you been to the brainteasers stackexchange? it is horrible
as well they should
 
@EricTressler "The're" → "There", "sentence" → "sentences", "fun" → "stupid". ;)
 
7:42 PM
Puzzling? They're having fun discussing in the Green Llama as we speak
 
@IlmariKaronen "The're" → "There", "sentence" → "sentences", "grammar" → ""
 
yeah, puzzling. I find most of the questions on there really insipid. I was hoping for things like you might get in a tech interview
 
@Sp3000 what ? on my brother ?
 
They're trying to fix that
But meta's been a bit of a mess lately because people have different ideas about how the site should be
 
7:44 PM
@Optimizer I think he's still online regularly
 
did you see him recently ?
 
hmm
so SE is letting me down :(
I find it amazing there isn't a suitable place for this sort of question yet
maybe soon...
 
what is your question
 
@Optimizer well not in chat, but he's never been very active here
but he was online today
 
ah I see
I must say that the music is super hexagonest!
 
7:50 PM
@EricTressler I want to put in wireless coverage for a large house
@EricTressler what's the best way to do it?
 
Super User, maybe?
 
@Lembik call in a professional ?
@Sp3000 you meant Super Hexagonest, right ?
 
shortest program to wired house?
 
@Sp3000 interesting suggestions
@Optimizer we don't have professionals like that where I live!
 
shortest program to untanle bunch of wires
 
7:52 PM
@Optimizer you would get someone who left high school early and once built their own computer from parts, if you are lucky
 
@Sp3000 I think superuser might be the answer! Thank you
 
@Sp3000 getting stuck in that spiral in triangles :D
 
i think you probably want wireless repeaters
put the modem and router somewhere convenient, and try a laptop wherever you might want to go. anywhere the signal is too weak, hook up repeaters to remedy
 
Hey, a while ago, somebody on here posted a website that was fantastic for learning new languages
 
7:58 PM
I've never done this, by the way, but it sounds reasonable. the repeaters are wired, though, so they will require cabling.
 
@NathanMerrill w3schools ?
 
it was geared towards people who knew languages, and it was a very tall website
 
:P
 
was it something like "learn x the easy/hard way"?
 
7:59 PM
how do you measure the tallness of a website?
 
By height, of course :P
 
basically, you could learn all of the intricacies of a language
feersum: the amount I have to scroll
that sounds familiar geobits
 
I remember talking about it here (when I was asking for Haskell info), but I can't remember the exact name.
 
learn you a haskell for great good
 
wow, someone's spamming the frontpage... I left a comment asking him to stop that
(just saying, so not everyone does the same now)
@Optimizer grrr
@NathanMerrill learnxinyminutes.com?
 
8:03 PM
What front page
 
thats it!
thanks!
 
@EricTressler ppcg
 
@MartinBüttner Oh, should I have said w3fools ? :P
 
@MartinBüttner do you just mean "All questions"?
 
@EricTressler codegolf.stackexchange.com
the page you get to when you click on the site "logo"
the one that's always sorted by activity
 
8:04 PM
need more examples
the one where Aaron is currently spamming
@MartinBüttner @ □
 
i got some more reputation yesterday for a MO question I asked 2 years ago
still no answers :(
@MartinBüttner I see now; I wasn't really aware of that feature
 
I believe it's how most regulars on PPCG use the site (it's obviously fairly useless on the more active sites)
 
that is a very interesting situation with that snowflake question
 
@feersum What does that question have to do with the koch snowflake?
oh, there was a bonus
nevermind
 
8:24 PM
them double staircases -_-
 
8:36 PM
I wish hats showed progress
 
8:48 PM
we are at 2.5 questions per day.
up by 0.2
 
@Optimizer this is the saddest thing about that :(
 
The difference in quality between bugs that developers write and bugs that testers write is astounding. The newest developer found bug reads:
"The message buffer is unstable."
and it has a description of
"Some quirky things are going on, and it may not be our fault."
That's verbatim, written by a developer who has been coding here for 18 years.
 
"Bug" - "Something is buggy"
 
> it's borken
2
 
9:01 PM
@Rainbolt Are you saying the testers are worse? I can't judge for myself because I don't have a sample from them ;)
 
@Geobits Our testers attach entire databases to even the simplest of bugs. They are soulless bug writing machines.
(Disclaimer: Testers are actually very nice people with souls.)
 
they are bug finding machines
 
^ (Subject verb agreement ;p)
 
9:17 PM
@EricTressler thanks.. apparently the answer is wireless access points all on the same ssid
 
@EricTressler Nor is the first. It's orthography.
 
@EricTressler oh did you get a chance to look at my challenge by any chance?
 
@PeterTaylor Sorry, I have no idea what you're talking about
@Lembik no, let me take a look
 
Click the up-left arrow before the @ and you'll see what I'm talking about.
 
@EricTressler thanks. The question is whether there is secretly some math that can help :)
@EricTressler instead of all this low level C++ coding
 
9:21 PM
oh. thanks
@PeterTaylor Thanks, that's useful
Lembik, as far as I know, that's a very hard problem (the one on MO)
 
@EricTressler if you have any thoughts about my challenge I would love to hear them. A few symmetries were spotted but I can't believe there isn't more that can be said .. if only I knew the math :)
@EricTressler oh wait.. maybe we are talking about different questiojns
 
Quite possibly, given that all yours look alike ;)
 
@PeterTaylor :) every time you say that I paste codegolf.stackexchange.com/users/9206/lembik
 
The maneuvering problem on S^2. If you read Bill Thurston's response, you can sort of tell how difficult it is
 
@EricTressler oh I see! Sorry I was totally confused
@EricTressler yes it does look hard and very interesting
 
9:24 PM
He was extremely famous, and has unfortunately since died
him answering that was kind of like having a Nobel laureate answer your question on physics.stackexchange
 
:) that's really great
I like it when Peter Shor answers questions about Shor's algorithm
which happens a few times
 
Yeah, I've corresponded a tiny bit with Shor
 
@EricTressler I should go soon but if you get a chance to look at my question please do leave me a message, or add a comment to the question.. or anything really :)
attach something to a carrier pigeon :)
 
@Lembik I read it, but I'll say something after I've thought about it a little while.
 
@EricTressler thanks. I really look forward to it
 
9:31 PM
0
Q: Prepositional phrase agreement with the rest of the sentence

RainboltIs the following sentence grammatically correct? Our testers are actually very nice people with a soul. Assuming it is grammatically correct, is it logically correct? Am I implying that all of our testers share a single soul? I understand that there are less confusing alternatives, such as...

 
@PeterTaylor re your comments... good point about the clap. but for the fire storm, casting two of them isn't possible, so I thought it would be unambiguous. I'll change it though.
 
they have only one soul
tester hive mind!
 
@PeterTaylor fixed
 
> But since the common understanding of the meaning of soul makes this unlikely...
Since when do we use "common understanding" here? Obviously we should be looking for any possible ambiguity to exploit.
 
but if we use common understanding, then it become simply incorrect!
 
9:41 PM
@Rainbolt :P
 
The biggest troll award now goes to @Doorknob冰
 
Link?
 
4
Q: Reverse indentation

Doorknob 冰 I've heard that your code can run faster if you indent it in reverse, so that the compiler can process it like a tree design pattern from the very top of the "branches" down. This helps because gravity will speed up the time it takes for your code to be compiled, and the data structure efficien...

 
@Optimizer I see that my goal of infuriating as many people as possible with the first two paragraphs has been achieved. ;) — Doorknob 冰 ♦ 12 mins ago
 
it's a really nice challenge actually :)
 
9:55 PM
Whoah. I broke the chat reply feature.
Hover over the comment. Does it highlight Eric or Optimizer?
Oh I see. Doorknob was actually replying to Optimizer. Ignore me.
 
@Sp3000 runner 2 has some seriously creepy levels. :D ... I just played one where the slenderman was occasionally lurking in the background :D
 
D:
 
that indentation challenge will go viral :D
 
You should get an answer in fast then :P
 
he's getting that hat!
 
10:06 PM
that hat?
ah, that hat
 
oh, its already 29 minutes! :(
time flies on PPCG
 
To get that hat you'd need to come up with a Calvin-quality domino-code
 
or a very easy question which potentially gets closed after 20 minutes and gets 5+ answers
Hipster style ping - @frya
 
What is Bruce Lee's favourite element? FRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAA
 
10:09 PM
lame
Silly Frya, it has to end with lee
 
ugh, I hate it when online interpreters are outdated
(I hate it even more if I then discover that my local interpreter isn't any newer...)
 
I'm right with you buddy. Nearly everything I type gets misinterpreted.
3
 
+1 for the meta-joke
 
@Rainbolt I'm not sure what you mean by that. Are you saying something about tips again?
 
10:23 PM
Take that, Python.
@Optimizer lol Sc
 
:D well.
 
@MartinBüttner how are you putting the right space back in your answer ?
 
@Optimizer "right space"?
 
you sort the spaces and then inverse and zp
after that I am lost
 
10:25 PM
gsub
"substitute globally"
the inverse and zip becomes a hash, which is used to look up string replacements
 
sad that cjam er does not work like that
 
heh
it's more like Ruby's tr
 
yeah
 
your solution isn't right though
do you just subtract from the longest length?
that only works for equidistant intentations
try the abcdefgh example
 
also, 32f- won't work.
@MartinBüttner ah. lets see then.
there you go.
 
10:35 PM
32f-:g is still shorter.
 
:g does not work
remember ?
 
then Scf=:!
 
actually, I dont even need all that :D
 
qN/_{Scf=:!1a/0=,}%___&$_W%er]z{~S*@+>N}%
 
@undergroundmonorail I just tried to Python but I ended up too similar to yours. But I think it'd be shorter in Python 3
 
10:39 PM
probably. raw_input() is 4 characters longer than input() and print() is only 2 longer than print
 
f=lambda x:len(x)-len(x.lstrip())
s=input().split("|")
*y,=set(map(f,s))
for l in s:print(" "*y[~y.index(f(l))]+l.lstrip())
 
@Optimizer you still don't need that backslash at the end
 
oh
ok
 
@Sp3000 ooo
 
6 more bytes to go
 
10:41 PM
@undergroundmonorail I found out once that doing x=[];x+=set(y) for some reason sorts y. I can't find it in the docs though
 
i think it's technically undefined. at least in python2. but if it works for you, all's fair ;)
 
... I'll see if I can do something else, I don't feel right posting practically the same thing :P
 
@Optimizer probably not with this approach
 
yeah
 
@Optimizer qN/_{S/{,!},,}%___&$_W%er]z{~S*@+>N}%
 
10:52 PM
nice!
i'll finish explaining this first. almost done.
 
not sure why this one doesn't work though: qN/_{S/{,}#}%___&$_W%er]z{~S*@+>N}%
 
Maybe that's because you're writing it in Gibberish :(
2
 
lol
it looks very readable to me :P
 
is there a language called Gibberish? If there isn't, we should make one
 
think there is
 
10:57 PM
there is
 
Yeah, I googled it. dammit
 

« first day (1419 days earlier)      last day (3407 days later) »