The Whiteboard

1:45 AM

for fucks sake this is the least helpful site to programmers trying to ask questions it takes longer to figure out how to word a question without pissing people off for formating. Just let me ask a question — Programmerdave 36 secs ago

Nicolas Raoul

7:28 AM

When I have complex JUnit constructions with large @Before and @Autowired things, I often write a small unit test that does really nothing. If even that test fails, I know there is a problem with my JUnit constructions. Are other people doing this? Is there a name for that "technique"? Is there a by-convention method name for it? (I used to call these methods "placebo()" but I discovered placebo is also the name of a unit tests library so it might be confusing.

kayess

8:11 AM

Good morning

I have a question regarding an answer I wrote here. This morning I have edited it to add some reference links to it for furhter informations and I have included a link to a Pluralsight course. What I'm asking is by adding such links I hope that I won't be considered as a spammer -since I have really no connection to that site which contains courses one have to pay for to access the content.

I have -compared to everyday users- fairly good "moderating" past on SO, but just trying to get used to SE site rules

Ignacio Soler Garcia

11:20 AM

We are a company developing among other things a somewhat complex Word add-in (500KLOC).

We started one year ago to create and collect crash dumps but we lack the knowledge to fully understand them (we can handle standard .net crashes but sometimes the call stacks get complicated).

Can you point us to companies or individuals focused on this kind of postmortem analysis (or a place where we can locate them)?

Thomas Owens

12:30 PM

@kayess I don't see a problem with that answer at all. In fact, we encourage adding links to support an answer. The important things to keep in mind are that an answer should stand alone (people shouldn't have to visit links or pay for things behind a paywall in order to get an answer to their question) and that if you do have a relationship with the target of the link it should be disclosed.

kayess

12:42 PM

@ThomasOwens Alright thanks for your acknowledgement. Shall I edit it and make it clear that course link is behind a paywall? And of course I don't work at Pluralsight :) Just mentioned as a very good source for learning in subject matter

Thomas Owens

@kayess I don't think that's necessary, but it may be nice.

To add that it's behind a paywall, I mean.

kayess

@ThomasOwens Edited Please see if you think it's acceptable.

And thanks you for your assistance and time :)

Thomas Owens

I think that's fine. Thanks for taking the time to ask.

kayess

It's a recurring problem at SO, that's why I'm asked here to make it clear

Also wondering about how to identify the fine line about how far shall I go with question OP... how many edits are fine responding to questions asked in comment.

in SO Close Vote Reviewers on Stack Overflow Chat, 36 mins ago, by NathanOliver

Just to add my two cents I'll typically answer a follow up to the solution if it is not a completely different answer. After that though I tell them it is time to ask another question and link back to this one as reference to where they started.

Though we have been discussing it at socvr.SO chat and this looks fairly acceptable to me

Transcript for