The Ubuntu SDK is nice, but horribly buggy. I try to cancel a download and end up freezing Qt Creator. What's worse is that the download continues even after killing Qt Creator. So I have to open a terminal up and kill the downloading process myself.
We can assume that each user takes up at most 0.4GB of space (constant) and 100MB of RAM (when online). The server itself takes 256MB of HDD space and 500MB of RAM
The command dpkg-repack can help you by following way:
First List packages required for installing Desktop-Environment (Here example for xubuntu-desktop:
sudo apt-get install xubuntu-desktop -s | grep Inst | cut -d " " -f 2 | sort > file1
Above command writes required packages' list for xub...
I just created a new ubuntu touch emulator (ubuntu 14.10 sdk i386 devel).
Check device image version..
X86 Emulator
aosp_x86
generic_x86
243
i386
I have a default QML code :
import QtQuick 2.0
import Ubuntu.Components 1.1
/*!
\brief MainView with a Label and Button elements.
*/
Mai...
@terdon Is blindly killing a process much better? If it is, pkill would make it a better answer but apt* might be mid-package-configuration or in a stalled update (which, no, wouldn't be as bad)... The answer the question needs is a flow chart of how to work out what's happening. Kill then delete are both in the "if nothing else works" category.
I guess just deleting the lock means that if apt is running, it probably will munch your status. At least if you kill it, you're insulating yourself against the old instance. The new apt instance will have to fix the current status before progressing.
I honestly don't know what the adverse consequences of deleting a lock file could be. I've done so in cases where I knew there were no running instances and it has never been a problem but deleting it while it's running to then allow a parallel apt to run sounds like a recipe for disaster.
Why not something like: lsof | grep /var/lib/dpkg/lock then? The only time I've had to deal with an apt lock is when I was inside of a not stalled update that I backgrounded and forgot about while tweaking something or when something was unceremoniously nuked by power loss.
At least then you know if something is actually holding on to it or not. Or does the family of utilities just drop the file and not hold it open?
Yeah, that makes sense too. What I didn't like was the fact that the most upvoted answer was "just sudo delete the lockfile". That seems like spectacularly bad advice.
hopefully, I think I just need to form the address right, thankfully it looks like the error output shows what it was trying to send, so I should be able to tweak it to work
In other news, every time someone says we're too hard on bug questions here, I'm tempted to refer them to the KDE/Kwin/Wayland bug policy which reads as follows: I found a bug, what should I do? Open your text editor, fix it and open a review request on Review Board.
Umm, @Seth any chance of refunding a bounty for me? I offered one here a couple of hours ago but the OP has since decided that my answer works and accepted it.
It is also the highest scoring answer there. Not sure what will happen if I let the bounty expire. Perhaps it will come back to me automatically?
@terdon No it won't come back, but I'm not sure about the policy on refunding bounties. Pretty sure that is only for edge cases, but I will look into it.. Or you can, I suppose ;)
No rush right? I have some other stuff that needs doing first.
@Seth the workarounds in the comments didn't work (as they didn't for another user in the comments)... I have marked it as affecting me :) Is there any way I can atleast have horizontal and vertical scrolling enabled for now? (and select and dragging...)
Np. And, it's fine. It's just a thing. It's how people know I'm not a total ass... the doing things like that bit. I can be REALLY harsh, but I can also do those other things.
Unable to add overview scope, can't find with ID: "scopes"
RegistryObject::ScopeProcess::exec(): Process for scope: "com.ubuntu.developer.mateo-salta.utfeed_utfeed" started
ScopeBase::run(): unity::InvalidArgumentException: CategoryRenderer(): invalid JSON definition:
unity::ResourceException: Failed to parse json string: * Line 12, Column 17
Missing '}' or object member name
> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-generic : Depends: linux-headers-generic (= 3.2.0.58.69) but 3.2.0.70.84 is installed linux-image-generic : Depends: linux-image-3.2.0-58-generic but it is not installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.
Then sudo apt-get dist-upgrade -f gets me:
> Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done Calculating upgrade... Done The following packages will be upgraded: linux-generic linux-image-generic 2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/4146 B of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> $ sudo apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: linux-headers-3.2.0-56 linux-headers-3.2.0-56-generic Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: linux-generic linux-image-generic The following packages will be upgraded: linux-generic linux-image-generic 2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
apt-get autoremove doesn't help me either
> $ sudo apt-get autoremove Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-generic : Depends: linux-headers-generic (= 3.2.0.58.69) but 3.2.0.70.84 is installed linux-image-generic : Depends: linux-image-3.2.0-58-generic but it is not installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.
OK, I think that the problem here is that linux-headers-generic and linux-image-generic are meta packages that bring in the most recent versions of linux-headers and image.
What version of emphasized textubuntustrong text can I use for a emphasized textDell Dimension 3000 celeron 2.40GHz with 512mb
ramstrong text
The command dpkg-repack can help you by following way:
First List packages required for installing Desktop-Environment (Here example for xubuntu-desktop:
sudo apt-get install xubuntu-desktop -s | grep Inst | cut -d " " -f 2 | sort > file1
Above command writes required packages' list for xub...
I just created a new ubuntu touch emulator (ubuntu 14.10 sdk i386 devel).
Check device image version..
X86 Emulator
aosp_x86
generic_x86
243
i386
I have a default QML code :
import QtQuick 2.0
import Ubuntu.Components 1.1
/*!
\brief MainView with a Label and Button elements.
*/
Mai...
