@NickAlexeev, when you want to close something, but know it is a judgement call, there should be a way for you to give a regular close vote rather than just hammer it.
@ThePhoton I would agree with your reasoning. Unfortunately, that's not how SE system is set up. When diamond mods get the big hammer, they don't get to keep the small one. (This issue has been discussed in the past.)
@PlasmaHH yah. No. I like Dave, but not that much that I blindly trust his sensor and Altium experience to drive successful design of a competing product to Fluke, Keithley, Keysight, et al
@Mast someone then just send me all competitors meters, some meters with a few digits more, a little bit of calibration gear and I will do a comparison video for free!
@PlasmaHH I won't. Because no time, because need make money, to buy more stupid crap people will eventually want me to make videos with, which I won't do, to make more money to buy more stupid crap, ad infinitum
@PlasmaHH Weird. Almost as if just behind the blades the air fall far enough in pressure to take up more water vapor from the sea, which then collapses out when pressure returns to normal.
My natural expectation would be that the dynamic isn't deep or long enough to actually take up extra water and that there would actually a trail of missing mist in a collapsing cone behind the windmills
The tips are rotating rather fast so I would expect some vortices to build up and rather quickly go into turbulence, so if at all the opposite round (visible vortices like with propellers in humid air, then dissolving)
The difference is that with propellers the vacuum is in front of the propeller, whereas the same propeller turning as propelled by the wind the vacuum is behind it. Which can cause a myriad of different fluid dynamics with turbulent flow
Can also not, and I don't feel like enveloping it, since my brain is already using all cores for processing the FW changes to be made because yet another datasheet didn't tell the whole story
"TransmitArbitraryLengthData" (name is different, but is somewhat sketching of what we're doing, NDA and all that) is now a function with clean and well thought out processing that hooks in nice little interrupt vectors customised to the purpose...
Oh and a "//This stupid shit is because TI also don't make proper chips anymore:" block
Ah shit!
@PlasmaHH When you linked the photo I should have said "Aaaaah! Vapour trails! The proof! The proof!"
And I'll be making them in my crystal clear epoxy, because then people can look at the silicon and see that I actually documented everything, rather than just the 60% I think people want to hear. And the sooner people copy them for cheaper, the better, because then I can stop again.
@ScottSeidman the process of matching resistors, even high accuracy ones, is not entirely unheard of, although with the cheapening of laser gear, possibly a dwindling practise
If you need 2%, can't afford a BGA process and have no room for resistors as well because of that, you damn well will buy those. It's all about options. Again, point being, looking for fixed gain on google took 1 minute
@ThePhoton They discontinued all the useful ones overnight?
Just, not even a 2 year process, just, over night, shredded all stock
Instrumentation amp. The matched resistors are on die so you don't have to worry about them. Usually just provide one external resistor to set the gain.
It's one of those things you tell your boss at the end of a day of debugging when he asks you "Did you fix it yet so there's super low disparity between channels?"
Answer: "In stead of telling me to gain everything by two on my board, can't you just half your expectation? Then I'm done, give my 5 minutes to short all the feedback resistors"
@ScottSeidman You'd have to add them using a pre-made high accuracy adder, or a fully compensated resistive one
Before you know it you'll be using 10 op-amps to get the same stability as halving your expectations would have gotten you
Yeh, but women generally don't like me enough to stay for more than a few hours, and I haven't tried men, as they do absolutely nothing for me, and with the neighbour-deal gender is a none-issue
@Marla Which means they are due for some back pay, after all, the men kept saying "honey, your job is to take care of the kids"
@Marla Only when @ThePhoton isn't here. He's secretly a retired school teacher of the old fashioned kind, you need to raise your hand and wait for your turn, wet your pants if you must.
We'd rather you ask "how do I design this?" or "What features/specs should I look for when shopping for that?" instead of "Where can I buy the other thing?".
@JamesC Use this electronics.stackexchange.com/help page to help you to improve your question. Edit your question, and (hopefully) moderators would release the question from being on hold.
The main reason for that rule is that it is absolutely uninteresting for anyone using any other thermistor to read your shopping question in vain, wasting their time and then driving them to ask more shopping questions and eventually flooding the archives with pointless information.
Whereas a "How do I find out what's a good replacement" might actually help the entire lot of you
@JamesC it was probably that I gave away the answer in the comment section. Went off to make the answer, then OP realized the schematic I pointed to had the answer. Is ok. As long as the customer is happy :)
I do see the OP's (questioner) here on EE SE as customers. EE SE has a service to sell. The price is right for the customer. The price is only having to do a bit of research and attempt solution before asking question here.
There's another thing I'm wondering about. I see questions on EE SE about Arduino or RPi. Do they usually get migrated to Arduino and RPi sites respectively?
And why would someone consider posting here, instead of one of those 2 SE.
you can also link your comment to another's comment (doesn't work on mobile app), at the far right of a person's comment, position mouse over their comment, and you will see a right arrow. This automatically inserts the ampersand and their name into your field of typing
If I test an embedded system at an EMI place and it passes, then I go to release and there's a software bug, and I fix that bug, then have I invalidated my EMI test results?
@EwokNightmares Let the end user (internal whatever) know of the test results, and software change, and kick it upon them to decide. Out of their budget then.
I guess I just have to tell my boss these things and he won't care anyway and then I'll just decide to pass it anyway cause I won't change anything critical.
Can you try jumping the base to ground with a 10meg resistor and see if it stops? Kinda a shot in the dark there but, ya, it's an order of magnitude larger so I wouldn't think it would be the issue.
I could surely arrange it in a way that it works with both removed, yeah
not for 5Mhz probably, but surely for 35
another funny aspect is that the oscillation amplitude depends on how I bend the leads of RE, not sure about the exact mechanism here, but well, at those frequencies...
