« first day (2 days earlier)      last day (4930 days later) » 

3:00 AM
wow. I completely missed that
so I need to pick a class for the gnome then
 
hold up, mate :)
I haven't passed papers around
 
I'll tell people when I do and what they have to do.
 
I think we're about ready for that, though.
Unless we're waiting for more?
 
When we have the 5th person here in chat, yeah.
 
3:01 AM
JRRodrig7 won't be in here tonight, but I've got him via txt.
 
There's no rush
I'll wait to do this properly.
We're already generating some good questions.
 
If he lacks the 20 rep I think I can give him access
 
@CRoss He lacks the internet at the moment.
 
so are we trying to do the character creation synchronously?
 
That is a problem I cannot solve
 
3:03 AM
@BrianBallsunStanton I figured if we could get on to the backgrounds, that would be a good place to pause for a bit as it's perhaps the first step that requires some serious consideration..
 
This is supposed to be a daily step/ongoing thing. Since we have the requisite number of participants, we can start with the rotation. The guy who doesn't have net now can read up on this stuff, and contribute his part whenever he gets net, right?
i.e. we don't have to all be on at the same time
 
I will bow to the majority then.
 
Also, people without PHBs or the CB (i.e.: RMorrisey, JRRodrig7) handy will need some time to research.
@RMorrisey We don't need to be on at the same time, but for character creation at least, we all need to be at the same step in the process.
 
this is true
 
At this moment, we are (races all selected)
 
3:06 AM
is it possible to delete a message?
 
I don't think so
 
Okay. Phase 2 ready. Deadline approx 24 hours, depending.
er, phase 3, in fact...
 
Ok, I'm slightly lost. Are we just choosing classes, or also feats?
 
Classes and, if necessary, class feature
and if applicable some sort of "theme"
 
feature != feat, then?
 
3:08 AM
Correct
For example "Storm Sorcerer" is a class feature of "Sorcerer"
or "Tempest Fighter" is a class feature of Fighter
 
Oh, there's a different term I've seen for that I think.
 
What's a good way to do this without having a book?
 
Example: "Build" or "Focus"
 
i was thinking we could discuss in chat
 
3:09 AM
@RMorrisey Real hard to do without a book, or character builder, I think.
 
without a book.... open up compendium and take a look at the freebie classes they offer
 
Character builder is free for the first three levels
 
oh, excellent
grab a copy of character builder, then :)
 
If you've got a spare $8 you can sign up for one month D&DI and get the current full copy of CB.
($8 or 9, i think it is)
You'll also get full Compendium access.
 
What is a Shardmind? I don't even see it listed in community.wizards.com/wiki/dnd:CharOp/Race_Guides
 
for example, anyone have a problem with warlock for the gnome?
 
Sharmind is a psionic construct
 
@RMorrisey Brian addressed that earlier. Let me look that up.
 
What kind of lock? :)
 
fey pact?
 
3:11 AM
hrmm, traditional. But tradition works. And lines up with stats.
 
installing the DDI builder demo
 
lol, anyone have qualms with my decision?
 
in The Back Room: Table 1 - OOC on Role-playing Games Chat, Oct 17 at 23:59, by Brian Ballsun-Stanton
"Raw psionic energy barely contained in a body of gleaming crystalline shards" +2 Intelligence, +2 Charisma or +2 Wisdom, Skill Bonuses: +2 Arcana, +2 Endurance, +2 to choice of one other.
Crystalline Mind: You have resist 5 psychic. The resistance increases to 10 at 11th level and 15 at 21st level.
Immortal Origin: Your spirit is native to the Astral Sea, so you are considered an immortal creature for the purpose of effects that relate to creature origin.
Living Construct: You are a living construct. You do not need to eat, drink, breathe, or sleep. You never make Endurance checks to resis
 
Nope. Is also traditional and fun.
 
:4502 Thanks
 
3:12 AM
oooh, 2 fey pact locks?
 
@RMorrisey Shardminds are pretty purpose-built for Psion, but feel free to choose whatever.
 
shrugs honestly I'm using this as an excuse to see things in play I haven't had an opportunity to
 
Yup, is why I'm offering it this way.
 
It seems obvious that Shardmind is well-suited to controller, I'm looking through the options
 
4
Q: What classes can a Shardmind play?

IsziThe Shardmind race is quite obviously purpose-built for the Psion class. What other classes could the Shardmind excel in?

 
3:13 AM
Okay, I think I need to revise this step.
now it's a "choose 2"
 
I was about to ask what would happen if we end up with all striker/controllers :-)
 
Yeah. Saw that coming fairly quickly
now, part of that is my job to make sure that I suggest something that isn't... a striker/controller
 
All strikers, not so bad. All controllers would be in deep doo-doo.
 
depends, actually
I think an all-controller party could be absolutely vicious, like if everyone was an essentials mage
mind you, if the enemy ever actually /got/ to the party, there'd be a splat, but it'd take a remarkable amount of effort for that to hapepn
 
@RMorrisey Forgive my earlier error. I believe I said Character Builder starts with race. It starts with class.
 
3:16 AM
what are they stat bonuses for the half elf. I only have PHB1
 
Ability scores: +2 Charisma, +2 Constitution
Size: Medium
Speed: 6 squares.
Vision: Low-light

Languages: Common, Elven
Skill Bonuses: +2 Diplomacy, +2 Insight.
Dilettante: At 1st level, you choose a 1st-level at-will attack power from a class different from yours. You can use that power as an encounter power.
Dual Heritage: You can take feats that have either elf or human as a prerequisite (as well as those specifically for half-elves), as long as you meet any other requirements.
Group Diplomacy: You grant allies within 10 squares of you a +1 racial bonus to Diplomacy checks.
but with essentials
helfs get um...
 
I think playing a psionic race with a psionic class may be a "best fit", but I wouldn't say it is the "most interesting". Going to go with a one-off combination. CB is installing now
 
Ok, I'm sorry for anyone offended by this, but I'm almost ready to vote that participation requires a D&DI Subscription.
 
Well, CB is a free demo
 
you offend me deeply
 
3:17 AM
Let's see if that works.
 
aren't the books good enough?
 
And I want to see if it works without DDI access.
 
@BrianBallsunStanton Yeah, but does that include the full updates?
 
:4532 Dunno, let's find out before throwing stones :)
 
@CRoss Books are good I suppose, unless one decides to build a Revenant Assassin.
 
3:18 AM
:4532 Errata, but only content through 2008
We'll muddle through
 
@Iszi FWIW, I will bow out if I am forced to pay a monthly subscription of some kind in order to play. Just a matter of principle =) Same reason I don't play WOW.
 
:4535 Really? ouch.
Inasmuch as books are... accessable with some effort.
 
obviously the whole D&D world does not use DDI
 
I want to see how well this works without requiring DDI
 
Yeah, but if we're to collaborate on character building, then everyone should have access to the same information.
 
3:19 AM
:4542 ::shrug:: We'll see how much of a problem it turns out to be
 
Otherwise, RMorrisey is out on a limb for making any decisions on a Shardmind or a Wilden.
 
Oh, wait, duh
 
(PHB3 characters, would not be in the CB demo)
 
Everything you really need to know is on the charop boards
 
link?
 
3:20 AM
Thanks, I was looking at that from your question post earlier
 
It'd require a bit of clickyclicky to backrefernece good classes for race, but it's quite feasable.
 
And should I choose race feature as well (ie breath weapon)?
 
Plenty of user-submitted data, sure. But actual rulebook information - not so much.
 
Yes.
Yeah, but that's my job, mate. :)
 
mutter. have to reinstall CB. it cancelled itself because the installer stole focus while I was trying to type something else
 
3:21 AM
I want you guys to have the ideas in collaboration. The fiddily technical bits are... fiddily and technical.
 
@BrianBallsunStanton I thought the "feature" was mostly relating to stuff like builds.
 
:4558 It is. But for dragonborn sorcerer, racial breathweapon type is absolutely part of that.
 
@BrianBallsunStanton "Fiddly technical bits" like power descriptions and such?
 
@BrianBallsunStanton Ah, my mistake (breath weapon).
 
3:22 AM
i'll be posting the PDFs of the characters ... somewhere
to accompany iplay4e stuff
 
@BrianBallsunStanton That'll work after everything's selected. Again, people without D&DI or a full complement of books will be ill-equipped until that point.
 
I'm testing to see if we can make due :) Also community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/23212853/… is ... most droll
 
could we not help each other out? i thought that was the purpose of doing this in collaboration
what does anyone think of my class choices?
 
And yeah, helping is what it's all about
 
I don't mean to be stubborn about this, but I really feel that we'll be running into a good bit of difficulty with that issue as long as we're collaboratively building the characters. If we were individually building our own, there wouldn't be such a problem.
 
3:24 AM
:4570 Iszi. Once we run into actual difficulty, I'll figure something out.
hrmm, inspiring warlord helf...
 
@BrianBallsunStanton bows to DM
 
::pulls open the charop on warlords::
 
Or, wait... I wonder...
/me bows to the DM
Nope.
 
nope, that feature-request has been declined
 
Eric, take a look at the ardent handbook to see if it looks at all appealing :)
 
3:26 AM
As a sidenote, I never realized I could type "Nope." in less than one second, until the chat room told me so.
 
I suggest we use italics for character speech and bold for character actions
 
Oh, the stupid 1 second rule gets me quite often. I type way too quickly.
:4581 I'm /so/ not going to think about that right now.
 
I'm supposed to choose for a Gnome, eh? This one's new to me. Should be interesting.
@CRoss I second the motion.
 
So, the opinion of inspiring warlords is: "Inspiring Presence (PHB) - A decent surge-free healing effect.

 Not as reliably useful as some of the others here, but not a bad idea"
Oooh, actually. Take a look at Bravura
It's risky, but it somehow fits helf ...
(especially with the harlequin feat of just taunting your enemy until they miss you horribly)
 
alas, I should go to bed
night all
 
3:28 AM
@BrianBallsunStanton What's the idea behind two class selections anyway? Alternates to resolve party imbalance?
 
Do I need an update to my CB in order to access Shardmind? I don't see it in the races list
 
Everyone was going striker first choice.
umm.... if you don't see it then there's a decent chance you do... :(
um... take a look at google docs chat?
 
@RMorrisey You won't be able to update without D&DI
 
what's a nova turn?
 
3:37 AM
@RMorrisey In reference to what?
 
"Invokers are a divine ranged controller class introduced in Player's Handbook 2. They do three things well: they toss out large AOEs, they stunlock, and they help enable nova turns."
 
Let me look up the Compendium entry on Nova Turns...
(or Invokers)
 
back
Ah
Nova to basically explode in a burst of damage
 
Oh, ok
 
I'm guessing mxyzplk and Pat aren't joining the game?
 
3:40 AM
With the idea of using up expendable resources
 
(I see them in the room)
 
I think they are both idle
 
ooooh, willful optimist. Cool
 
ok. I changed warlord to ardent and added themes
 
cool
um, I think that's an elation mantle...
Yeah, elation is con based. Coolness
Oh, choice between elation and "impulsiveness"
impulsive is just... funky.
 
3:43 AM
:4615 sounds good to me. I do not have the psionics book. so I only know what is on the forums
 
yeah.
um, here's the flavour to choose from
As you take a hit, your anger unbalances your foes.
for um, elation
and
Your pain bleeds from you in a wave, touching your allies and lending new ferocity to their attacks. for imulsive
 
I was almost going to choose Psion for the Gnome.
 
@BrianBallsunStanton Sounded like Eric was going to?
 
i think I will choose mantle of elation
 
3:45 AM
cool
oh, point of order, a friend just recommended that we choose party theme before we choose classes.
 
The Gnome looks like he could be a great Telepathic Psion, and have him be a cunning trickster.
 
:4631 what do you have in mind?
 
Phase 3a has been added
 
@BrianBallsunStanton Okay, this is my first time actually doing collaborative character/party building of any kind (beyond ensuring all roles are covered). So, could you elaborate on 3a?
 
sure
My friend just noted: "Like yeah, maybe deciding on some kinda shared background or idea. eg. they're all from the same family."
 
3:48 AM
Yeah... "same family" not happening obviously. Unless, maybe same orphanage?
 
Basically taking the "why are you an adventuring party" step
and moving it before the classes.
Could be interesting. I will allow you folks to come to consensus, post ideas under 3a, and we'll just have informal upvoting
 
Oh, seemed like you were aiming more at "what kind of adventuring party are you"
 
a common enemy is a decent reason
 
We don't have any Defender type characters in our class list, it seems like
Do we think that's an issue?
 
Um, yes :)
 
3:50 AM
Not sure anyone needs to be similar in power source... really?
 
That's why I say consensus
and this is mainly an example :)
 
Well, it's surely not going to be a Gnome.
(The Defender)
 
aactually
gnomish um...
 
the teifling and the wilden could still fill that role
 
swordmage makes a not bad one.
 
3:51 AM
I prefer to build with two matching Key Abilities... which essentially places the Gnome in a Controller role.
(INT/CHA)
And, boom! We have a Bard! What would a Gnomish Bard's personality be...?
And, strike what I said about the controller. Looks like Bards are technically leaders.
 
ever play quest for glory V?
 
@BrianBallsunStanton Can't say I have.
 
ah, there are some fun gnomes there.
hrmm, maybe a um... tinkery style, instead of a funny style?
"shadow gnome" from um... 3.5's um... races of destiny?
 
The Gnome/Bard combination favors the "Valor of Cunning" build.
I think I'll tie the theme more to the character himself, instead of the class.
 
4:00 AM
Trying to get class selections from JR, but he'll probably delegate to me since he doesn't have D&DI and I don't think he has many books either.
 
um
that's not cool, actually.
 
He mostly plays pre-gens when he's at the table with us, or he'll borrow one of our laptops for the CB.
 
Yes. but I want him to be involved, not just a second seat for you
 
Had a feeling about that.
 
Having his player type is /useful/ in this test.
Also, handy little reference for everyone: community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/25135609/…
but he does have to participate and engage.
 
4:02 AM
Again, this is mostly part of the issue with community character generation when not the whole community has the same resources.
 
:4677 Yup. But it's possible to find "good enough" access to most of them
 
Once we're past that, it'll definitely be easier for those player types to be fully involved.
 
:4677 I disagree. He just needs us to provide the choices
I was able to choose the elated ardent despite not having access to the appropriate source books. I just needed Brian to make the suggestion.
 
Oh, great...
I just noticed, the Tiefling is another +2 Cha/Int class.
That puts three of our characters with the same bonuses, depending on the Shardmind's class.
 
what are the wilden stat bonuses?
 
4:05 AM
+2 Wis, Con/Dex
The Shardmind is +2 Int, Cha/Wis
(With "/" indicating choice.)
Bleh... I should teach myself something about consistency. Above posts for Wilden and Shardmind use "/" to indicate choice. For Tiefling and Gnome, it indicates combination.
 
so if the wilden chooses a defender and the +2 con we should be fine right?
 
Probably... depends on the Defender I suppose - do they all use Con?
 
the half elf as an ardent could possibly minor in defender
 
nope, defenders can use... anything really
 
@CRoss What do you mean for "Stunlock Invoker"? I see no such build.
Oops, wrong @
Meant @RMorrisey
 
4:12 AM
The lead-in blurb says they have good stunlock abilities, and I was looking at the The No-voker, stunlocker, build (not a tiefling, not sure how much that matters)
 
@RMorrisey Oh... Um... Let me look into it.
You first need to select a build: Preserving, Wrathful, or Malediction
 
it is after midnight EDT. need to get some sleep before work.
 
Then, a Covenant (typically goes with the build) and a Diety.
 
will check in later
 
The Diety may or may not matter much, but there's over a dozen to choose from.
 
4:14 AM
stunlock is actually fairly easy to flesh out
 
@BrianBallsunStanton I'm missing the meaning of "Stunlock" here.
Is it someone's name for a CharOp build?
 
Yeah. It's a theme on the charop. Basically status-effect lockdown
 
2nd sample build
it says he's a malediction invoker
 
yup. And there's feat support in sea and tyrany domains.
 
4:16 AM
Ok, not good for a Shardmind.
 
blaster is a bit tricker
 
Shardmind would be best as a Preserving invoker.
 
The other two lean on Wis/Con. Preserving leans on Int/Wis.
 
Eh, wis/con is fine
 
4:17 AM
Ok
 
Shardminds have bonus to Int and choice of Wis or Cha.
 
you don't need /both/ stats to be primary and secondary
you just need /one/ linked stat
to either primary or secondary. And stunvokers are fun :)
I see nothing wrong with saying "stunlock invoker" for shardmind
 
Thing is "Stunlock Invoker" refers to an entire build, not just a class.
 
Blaster... does need a /bit/ more detail though, specifically which pact.
 
I think stun abilities are useful for the party to have, not sure if shardmind invoker is the best combo to get that. I'll leave it up to you guys if you think it's optimal
 
4:19 AM
Yes, but it's a theme.
 
blaster is dark pact
 
how people articulate the theme is later.
oh, fun.
and they make great minor defenders
So yeah, there's no requirement for dual-stat links.
choose something that looks fun and interesting and don't fuss :)
and I really really do need to get back to work.
 
It would be nice, though. I would just as soon take the linked stats
 
That's another statement entirely :)
Voluntary choice is always fun.
 
Brian's right. Don't need to dual-link stats.
 
4:21 AM
actually, looking at it
Covenant of Preservation (PHB2) - I am not that bullish on presevokers. Their kickers are unremarkable and mostly defensive, their Channel Divinity is nice but is ill-suited to an AOE-focused class, and a few small slides (which can be duplicated to some degree with utility powers) never seem to be worth all of the other mediocrity. With the addition of Divine Power, int-based invokers can simply take the Covenant of Malediction.
 
Well, what is the purpose of this exercise? Is it to come up with some kind of "optimal" party, or just one that we like to play?
 
Ok, so maybe Invoker is not a good choice then for the shardmind?
 
It's to come up with a party that functions well in a group. Part of that is liking to play, and the other part is to be aware of the rest of the characters and knowing how one synergiezes
according to Mr. Handbook...
shardmind is skyblue (which I agree with, cause their racial is a great "I don't want to be here")
 
I think it's worth noting that I am deciding which class to use without even knowing what half of the other party's class selections are
 
4:23 AM
so preservation or malediction work as class features.
eyeball the other classes then :0
 
w.r.t party synergy
 
right. Eyeball the other classes then. If you like I can recommend some more... obscure classes.
 
Thanks
let me fish through the wiki thing and see if there's a better controller combo for shardmind
 
Brian and John are the only two who haven't selected classes, though. So, you're not totally in the dark.
 
I'm intentionally going last :)
 
4:25 AM
Brian added character role annotations so I know kind of what they are, now
 
And if you take a look at the races, you can get an idea what kind of classes may be selected.
 
Because that way, if we get more people, I can hand wilden to them and nothing bad happens
 
@RMorrisey Controller for Shardmind? Can we say Psion?
 
Brb, back in... 20 minutes.
 
If you like moving things around, Telekinetic Psion.
Like I said, they're kind of purpose-built for that class.
 
4:29 AM
Though I'm hardly a 4e expert, I was a little dubious of psion because some of their cyan high-level powers sounded underwhelming from their descriptions on the character optimization site
 
In fact, if you do decide to go with Psion, I suggest taking Telekinetic so you go with an Int/Wis stat boost. Otherwise, we've got three guys in our party with Int/Cha and that'll throw off our skills balances. Again though, you don't have to go with Telekinetic Psion, or Psion at all.
Yeah, I've gotta get more familiar with CharOp.
 
sure, I'll make it a TK psion
 
I'm looking up other classes that use INT/WIS. There may be something else of interest I've just not stumbled upon before. What build is that Dark Pact Warlock, by the way?
(Deceptive or Scourge)
 
Eldritch Pact: Dark
Races: Tiefling, Gnome, Drow, Half-elf, Halfling, Dragonborn, Human, Changeling, Shardmind
Implement Preference: Staff, Dagger, Rod
Recommended Stat Array: Str 8/10, Con 11, Dex 13, Int 16, Wis 8/10, Cha 16
I don't really understand the question. The info there is listed under Archetypes: Corruption Templates
 
Hm... link?
 
4:34 AM
This build is a straight-up ranged combatant that focus fires on single targets. It uses mobility and retribution and dodge powers/features to discourage targets from firing back and avoid the few attacks directed at it. The build uses its mobility powers/features to get the Prime Shot bonus when it can. It prefers powers with higher damage over those with more control. Charisma and Intelligence get all of the level up points.
 
Looks like it doesn't specify, but it (and the Shardmind race) leans towards Deceptive, with the INT/CHA bonus.
 
Ok
 
So, items you need to specify as part of the Class selection are: Deceptive Warlock, Dark Pact, Eldritch Blast Charisma.
And edit the Race line to include INT/CHA for the bonuses.
Correction: Put that in Class.
And, add INT/WIS to the bonus for TK Psion.
A Shardmind striker... I never would have imagined, really.
 
I wanted to pick two different types, to give the party more versatility. Since shardmind had controller as its main shtick, I thought the warlock striker would be a good alternate
 
I like it.
 
4:42 AM
Thanks
 
Just never would have thought of it myself, 'cause I'm used to playing controller shardminds with minimal HP.
 
I'm looking at the warlock-related material in CB, but since my freebie CB doesn't actually support shardmind, I will leave it to the next person down the circle to actually flesh out the character details, if that is OK
TY for your help, by the way
 
No problem.
I just realized there's another item to be selected for Shardimd as well. They get an additional Skill.
But yeah, may want to leave that for next in the cycle.
Like I said earlier, if you don't mind paying for just one month of D&DI you can get the CB and all current updates. That should have all you'll need, and you don't lose the CB when your subscription ends - you just can't update it anymore.
Then if you ever feel you need a certain rules update in the CB later on, just buy that one month again.
 
If I run into a situation where I absolutely can't get by without it, then that's probably what I'll do. I want to see though if I can hack it without paying for it
If this game becomes a regular, long-running thing, I will probably just go out and buy the relevant books for my character
 
Then I definitely suggest trying to find those things Den suggested in the other chat, meanwhile.
 
4:47 AM
yeah
I kind of like the versatility of 4e at character creation. It makes me feel like I have a hundred different options, which isn't really the case in 3.5
 
You'll definitely find that you need all the information you can get, especially with Shardminds, Wilden, and Psions in play. Those are all PHB3 items.
Ardent is PHB3 as well.
 
although, I guess for caster classes there is still a lot of flexibility in spell selection
OK
 
Some of the other classes/races I see are PHB2, which may not have made it into the CB demo either.
Yeah, there's a lot of options in the CB for everything.
The Feats list is ridiculous.
 
Point of idle curiousity
 
Shoot.
 
4:52 AM
What is the metagame/twinkish significance of push effects? Usually moving enemies from one square to another in D&D is really not that big of a deal (at least not in 3.5)
But some of them are marked as really good powers in charop
Are there a lot of stationary, persistent AOE type of effects?
 
It can mean a lot in some scenarios. Especially if there are zones in effect, or if one of your party members benefits from flanking or combat advantage. And of course, there's the occasional pit to throw something into.
I found it useful once, to end a grab on someone.
 
Ahh, ok
 
Or, check out what happened in this scene (one of my favorite stories to tell):
6
Q: Is there a saving throw for forced movement over unrevealed pits?

IsziLet me share a story of what happened (it was an epic moment) in one game, which prompted this question. Our party consisted of a Shardmind Psion (myself), a Halfling Rogue, and a Dragonborn Paladin. We were tasked to check out a dungeon that was known to house goblins. Upon entering the room,...

 
oh yeah, I saw that one =)
 
That's another thing to be aware of with Psions. Psionic Augmentation.
Instead of Encounter powers, you get Power Points that you can spend to enhance certain At-Will powers.
For example, Kinetic Trawl normally only pulls the target one square.
Spend 2 Power Points on it though, and you can pull the target for a distance equal to your WIS.
 
4:57 AM
That's cool, I kind of liked the "PP" aspect of psionics in 3.5. It's nice to be able to customize the way you use your power, instead of automatically always having one big thing, and 3 little things
 
Some other classes that use the Psionic power source have Psionic Augmentation as well, but not all of them.
Don't know much about 3.5. I only came into the game some months ago myself.
4.0 was well into the mainstream by then, and PHB3 had just been released.
 
It uses a d20, and many of the same character classes exist, but that's about all it has in common. =) The game balance and some of the fundamental mechanics are radically different
Well, maybe that's an exaggeration
 

« first day (2 days earlier)      last day (4930 days later) »