« first day (1105 days earlier)      last day (3515 days later) » 

1:04 AM
-1
Q: Answer removal dispute

ThePiachuI would like to dispute the removal of this answer: http://christianity.stackexchange.com/a/6025/1283 The removal was justified by David Stratton as: the question is "what evidence is there?", not "Is the evidence valid?". For now, I'm deleting this because it doesn't answer the actual ques...

 
 
1 hour later…
2:33 AM
@curiousdannii I think you live in Australia. It may be different there.
@curiousdannii I'm not sure if it's exclusively a Protestant phenomenon.
@fredsbend Eh? "Mass" is one word, while "worship service" is two words.
Does anybody know whether the Bible has something to say about arranged marriages? Are they allowed? Orthodox Jews arrange marriages for whatever reason. It seems that the Hebrew Bible, at least, can be used to justify arranged marriages. And yet, American culture, which is largely influenced by Christianity, seems to lean towards love marriages.
How can love marriages be justified?
I have no problems with arranged marriages myself, as long as they are not abusive or forced.
Is it selfish to marry for love, without any consideration of what your parents or your future spouse's parents have to say on the matter?
I think some people find happiness within themselves, so love marriages would work for them, whereas some people find happiness within community, so arranged marriages would work for them.
In China, some families are not so rich, so when they take their children to restaurants, the families would buy food for the children and watch the children eat. It's a bit sad, because the adults don't get to eat the expensive food, but at the same time, it's emotionally touching that the adults would sacrifice so much for their children.
Likewise, some children would save up their red pocket money for buying a house for themselves and their spouses when they grow up. Aw...
 
 
2 hours later…
4:54 AM
@Anonymous Does "liturgy" sound like a common, well know word? How about "mass" outside of Catholics? Everybody knows what "worship" means. Everybody knows what a "service" is.
@Anonymous Not selfish, but it is foolish to marry without the parent's blessing. If your not arguing about money and sex, your arguing about the kids or the in-laws. Best to try to minimize those things before you seal the deal.
@Anonymous China's one child policy has drastically affected their culture, especially in regards to how parents treat their children. You might have heard of the "little emperor" problem. The issue is that several generations of the one child policy creates a scenario of six adults doting on one child with no competition for attention. The parents plus four grandparents, all are eager to get time with the child.
This has also indirectly affected the "tiger mom" characteristic. Parents have a lot invested in only one place. Their child's future success is directly related to how well they will be cared for when they are elderly.
Chinese family dynamics, especially those not outside of China, are very interesting.
 
 
4 hours later…
9:03 AM
@Anonymous "mass" and "worship service" are different things.
@Anonymous The bible certainly talks about arranged marriages... and AFAIK, never condemns them. It just speaks about them as a matter of fact (as they were at the time those portions of the Bible were written)
 
 
3 hours later…
12:05 PM
@fredsbend Nowadays, the Chinese have included an additional policy that, if the two individuals in marriage are only children, then they can have two children. Though, I recently heard in the news that that's too expensive...
@fredsbend Rural families and minority families are allowed exemption. The one-child-per-family policy applies to the Han Chinese.
@fredsbend I think Chinese immigrants in the US still have that Chinese mindset, but their children are definitely more westernized.
 
 
3 hours later…
Zoe
3:24 PM
Not sure if you guys can see this video: facebook.com/video.php?v=363133973756461
 
Not at work, no. :-(
 
Zoe
It is AWESOME.
It's like a game of chess but so awesome
 
@fredsbend I'm almost certain hardly anybody understands what "worship" is. What do you think it is?
 
@svidgen you mean it isn't just singing hymns? /sarcasm
 
@svidgen People might have many different ideas on what worship is, but I'd guess off the top of my head that many if not most Christians have an idea of what worship is.
 
3:33 PM
I never really thought of liturgy as much less understood than worship
outside of catholic circles, I'd agree mass is less understood. I honestly couldn't give you a good definition of that
but I suppose audience also matters, I think liturgy and worship are known well in Christian circles, but the term worship has broader meaning in general culture
for example, hero worship etc
 
@MattGutting What do you suppose "most Christians" think it is?
 
@svidgen I don't know, and I'm not assuming that there is one opinion which most Christians have. I'm merely assuming that most Christians hold some opinion - it could (in theory, and as far as I'm concerned) be different for each Christian.
 
Zoe
There is true worship and then there is.... worship. IMO.
 
@svidgen That is, I'm assuming that if you asked the question "Do you think you know what worship is?" most Christians would answer "Yes".
 
Zoe
3:48 PM
I have trouble discerning between praise songs and worship songs.
 
@MattGutting So ... to whoever's point it was above, maybe calling it "worship" is less "simple" -- since it is apparently a multi-interpretable word.
May be better, when a strict formula isn't involved, to just call it "getting high on Jesus."
 
@svidgen Most words are "multi-interpretable" when used informally. I don't think "worship" (in the context of "worship service") is necessarily any worse than any other English word.
 
Zoe
What are your own definitions of what a worship service should be?
 
@Zoe "Worship service" isn't a term I've ever seen used in Catholic discussions of public worship, so I don't have a handy reply to that. Give me a bit and I can come up with something.
 
@MattGutting well yes, of course. when you explicitly call a word or phrase out as being "multi-interpretable", you're appealing to a lower than average level of interpretive ... homogeny?
 
3:58 PM
@Zoe Also let me get some lunch - my mind is working at less than optimal level :-D
 
So, when I say it's [apparently] multi-interpretable, I'm saying, it's [apparently] less rigidly interpreted than a body of other words. In this case, I've directly contrasted it to [Catholic] mass.
Anyway ... the point I was hoping to make (for @fredsbend) is on a different tangent altogether! Namely, "worship" has a sort of primitive meaning. It's an expression or assignment of "worth" to something.
@Zoe To your question then, if you're talking about a "worship service", it's any "service" a that community agrees demonstrates the "worth" they put into X ... I'm assuming X is the Trinitarian God in this case.
If singing happy songs and drinking grape juice does that for some folks; so be it.
 
Zoe
I think a worship service prepares and open people's hearts towards God, in the modern context.
 
@Zoe Sure. But there's a reason "preparing and opening people's hearts towards God" was ever considered "worship" to begin with: Because it's an act of assigning worth to God.
 
Zoe
Biblically, Christians are exhorted to worship God with their life in truth and Spirit, as true worshippers. To be constantly relying on God, to surrender our will and always be aware of God.
 
Or rather, recognizing worth.
 
Zoe
4:07 PM
I don't really agree with the modern worship. It really is like getting high and then... after the service, most are like "Yeah good service! Let's get dinner or let's det drunk."
lol
idk
 
@svidgen So this is a definition of a "Trinitarian God" worship service, as opposed to, say, a Hindu worship service?
 
It's also why you'll be hard-pressed to zero in on a singular Christian vision of a "worship service."
 
Zoe
I think worship is less of the form and more of the heart (and purpose)
 
@Zoe "The modern worship?" Come to a Catholic Mass and see about "it's like getting high" :-)
 
@MattGutting No. I'm speaking to the particular case here. "Worship" is worship. It entails, to varying degrees, anything which recognizes a "vehicle" of worth. Or something like that ...
 
4:08 PM
@svidgen You did say "I'm assuming X is the Trinitarian God in this case" - but you didn't specify a case (that I could see)
Of course maybe I'm misunderstanding because I'm low on food :-D
 
"this case" being "what we're all talking about" ... which, I may have incorrectly assumed was "Christian worship services"
Eat!
 
@svidgen Probably I should have understood this.
@svidgen Yummy - fried catfish and sweet potatoes. Leftovers from yesterday's "evening out" :-)
 
@MattGutting Lately, I usually only participate here when I'm avoiding something else. Chatting here usually devolves into quibbling over terminology.
 
@svidgen Terminology is important (says the former math major)
 
Zoe
@MattGutting Getting high on prosperity is not like getting high on drugs. As long as your spirit and heart is lifted up in joy and wonder and idk what else feeling ur brain can conjure up, you are already getting high on Jesus.
Singing melodic hymns as opposed to modern songs also allow one to get high on Jesus, I supposed. it really is opening your heart to God.
To me, I think worship can take place anytime :)
 
4:15 PM
@Zoe I'm not entirely sure I agree with that. Purpose is important; but human beings are ritualistic beings for whom the way we do things is important. (I could, for example, shave before I take a shower, rather than after, but it wouldn't feel right.
 
Zoe
I always try and thank God for everything that happens in my waking moments
 
@MattGutting Important. But (per the tower of Babel?), hardly ever are two people in full understanding of a term.
 
Zoe
@MattGutting When I meant form I didn't meant formula, I meant way.
Like, it's wrong to say a small congregation has lousier wirship than let's say, Hillsong's.
 
@svidgen Agreed - unless it has a very limited scope.
 
@MattGutting Showering first saturates the skin with water and makes it easier to shave :)
 
4:17 PM
@svidgen Unless you're using an electric shaver :-P
 
Zoe
It doesn't matter what kind of songs, whether the worship has a live band or not. That's what I meant
 
@MattGutting Ah, touche!
 
@Zoe Well, then we get into the question of "What makes worship good worship?"
 
Zoe
@MattGutting As long as that good worship does not automatically mean good person, then yea I guess.
 
@MattGutting I may have C.SE stalked you ... and I'm a little uncertain about your answer to this one: christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/30323/…
 
Zoe
4:18 PM
@MattGutting worship service is a better word choice :)
 
If I have the energy later, I may have to pull you into a chat about it.
 
@svidgen OK - let me know. That's fine.
@Zoe Agreed
Mmm, yummy fried fish :-)
 
Zoe
@MattGutting I guess it really depends on the person. For me, I like my Wednesday church as it is very Biblical, more profound and more applicable to life and focuses alot on the will of God, but I cant get into their worship because 1) They're all adults 2) The songs are the classic slow-paced songs. When others see me during the worship session before the sermon, they will, 99% of the time, think I am a rebellious Christian or something.
I like my Sunday evening church because it's worship service is like a rock concert, the songs are catchy with the likes of Matt Redman, Hillsong, Chris Tomlin and Jesus Culture. But the sermon, as much as they expound on verses and apply them to education and life, it deviates alot from the Bible and is not as profound a insight. I guess it's because it is a Youth service.
If someone were to see these two sides of me during these two type of worship service, they would think I am a hypocrite, or that I prefer the Sunday evening Church.
 
@Zoe So: How would you change (or combine) these two to make your ultimate worship service - and why would it be your ultimate service?
 
Zoe
But that person will never know, that from the time I started going to my Wednesday church regularly, and got introduced to different types of praise and worship songs, my phone now has some worship songs from both churches, and I listen to them on repeat 24/7 as much as my time allows and I now seldom listen to my secular music :) Because only me, this chat and God knows that :)
@MattGutting Well, that would be a little impossible for my personality. I like the Sunday evening worship service not because it is a worship service, it's because it's a rock concert with songs I like, that coincidentally are praise and worship songs. Extremely contagious atmosphere. But that doesn't mean I actually see it as a worship service. Since I already listen and sing those songs all the time to worship the Lord, I don't need a designated time to worship God :)
I would much rather have my Wednesday church, without going for the worship, but that would be disrespectful to God's church, so I go and I listen to the songs and try to sing them, as best as I can.
 
4:29 PM
I'm not sure what you mean "without going for the worship"?
 
Zoe
@MattGutting Because I cant get into the worship and dont really see a need, but there is a need to go - that need to me is the respect and honour I give to the Church.
I think this would be my ultimate church, but probably not ultimate worship service
1 min ago, by Zoe
I would much rather have my Wednesday church, without going for the worship, but that would be disrespectful to God's church, so I go and I listen to the songs and try to sing them, as best as I can.
idk. If the Bible doesn't define what a worship service should look like, then there is no way for me to choose or make a form that would sit right with me, so I'd rather not choose altogether.
Even if I put the worship service from Sunday and the Wednesday sermon together, it would be my preferred Church but it wouldn't be my preferred worship service.
My preferred worship service is anytime I can spare to God. Because the sacrifice of my life is the best I can and probably the only thing I can offer to God.
 
@Zoe So you don't see a need for a public/communal worship service?
 
Zoe
I would think, me alone in my room strumming the guitar and singing is my preferred worship service :D
@MattGutting There is a need, but there is no need for me. The need of a public worship service is a testimony to God and as a witness to converts or unbelievers.
 
@Zoe Communal worship isn't necessarily about what you get out of it ...
 
Zoe
4:45 PM
@svidgen It Never said it was.
@svidgen If it was what I could get out of it, why do I still go even when I don't like it and get nothing out of it? I think you need to go back and read the chats again
 
@Zoe Not sure how far back you're hoping I read ... Point is, you're talking about what "I need." And although I'd strongly disagree (you're DNA says you need it), it's the wrong point to focus on. You "need" it at the very least because it's your communal obligation.
 
Zoe
@svidgen You could start from here
27 mins ago, by Matt Gutting
@Zoe So: How would you change (or combine) these two to make your ultimate worship service - and why would it be your ultimate service?
@svidgen No, I never mentioned what I need. I said I don't need a designated time to worship but I go because it is to respect and honour God's Church.
 
@Zoe Be more specific. I thought I'd seen everything from that point one -- nothing to indicate your interest in communal worship has anything to do with ... umm ... communal worship.
Anyway. I don't mean to pick you apart -- Just to clarify: Communal worship isn't about the individual. It's about the community. You partake because you owe it to the community. You partake because you're affirming the worth (worship is worth ship) of the communally held beliefs.
 
Zoe
27 mins ago, by Zoe
@MattGutting Well, that would be a little impossible for my personality. I like the Sunday evening worship service not because it is a worship service, it's because it's a rock concert with songs I like, that coincidentally are praise and worship songs. Extremely contagious atmosphere. But that doesn't mean I actually see it as a worship service. Since I already listen and sing those songs all the time to worship the Lord, I don't need a designated time to worship God :)
@svidgen Sigh. We are not talking about definitions already, he was asking about my experiences and there I said everything.
 
@Zoe Again, you're demonstrating a misunderstanding of what communal worship is.
 
Zoe
4:57 PM
22 mins ago, by Zoe
@MattGutting There is a need, but there is no need for me. The need of a public worship service is a testimony to God and as a witness to converts or unbelievers.
40 mins ago, by Matt Gutting
@Zoe Well, then we get into the question of "What makes worship good worship?"
The question before I expounded on my experiences is not about need but about the form.
You really really need to go back and read again.
Of course there is a need for communal/public worship but there is no need for me to have a designated time to worship the Lord. But I go because it is to respect and honour God's Church.
 
@Zoe So you prefer contemporary Christian music in worship services, right?
 
@Zoe You're hiding a self-contradiction in there, I think. What need is there for communal worship if you're not "needed" there?
Anyway ... I don't mean to harass you. Just hoped to slip the point in there: You said you don't need it. And I disagree, not only because you do (your DNA says so!), but because the point of communal worship (of any kind) is the communal unity -- and that's something, whether you think you need it or not, you literally cannot get outside of that communal setting.
 
5:14 PM
@svidgen When coupled with the word service, I think most people know exactly what goes on at that time. Some songs and a sermon.
 
And I keep side-stepping the point, because I'm an idiot apparently, but "my need" for communal anything has little to do with me and more to do with the community.
 
The usages of worship that you hint on are largely dependent on context.
 
@fredsbend And readings, and Communion (in our case), and perhaps some other celebrations (depending on the type of liturgy)...
 
@fredsbend What about songs and a sermon makes it worship?
 
@svidgen I'm not attempting to define worship. I'm positing that most people who would read "Worship Service: 9:30 Sundays" on a church sign would expect songs and a sermon if they showed up at that time.
 
5:18 PM
@Zoe One should of course pray and praise the Lord constantly - certainly worship need not, perhaps should not, be limited to a certain time. I don't think it follows that there is no need for a given person to worship at a specified time.
 
@svidgen Conversely, I don't think reading "Mass" on a Catholic church sign is as intuitive to a non-Christian. To be fair, they are slightly different, but, generally, those services include songs and a sermon too. "Liturgy" is an inside word. Even most Christians who've attended church their whole lives would hum and haw at that one.
 
as a sound guy, I know it was very key for me to recognize worship more as a state of the heart than a distinct action. Recognizing God's worth in as much as you can and giving him credit for what he has done
 
@fredsbend Maybe I missed some context ... I was reacting to your statement that "Everybody knows what worship is" ... and it's pretty clear they don't.
 
and after that realization, I was able to mix as an act of worship rather than as a distraction from it
 
@fredsbend Nor does everyone know what's meant by "service" either. Particularly in this context.
 
5:22 PM
@svidgen Anonymous asked why Protestants commonly call their liturgies "worship services." I think it is a practical issue and not a theological one.
@svidgen Actually, I think the context is pretty clear. A formal, passive event where little to no participation is required.
Contrast that with "meeting."
 
@fredsbend Ehh ... I'm not sure I have time for the full discussion that could ensue -- or the research I'd have to do to verify this: But, I think it's very theological.
 
Or "prayer night" in churchy language.
 
In fact, I'd argue most deviations in terminology have roots in subtle (and some not-so-subtle) differences in (or lapses in understanding of) the theology.
 
@svidgen absolutely.
 
@svidgen Perhaps started that way, as the Catholics are referring to the Eucharist almost exclusively when they say "Mass." Most protestants reject the Catholic Mass, though do find importance in remembering the last supper.
Today, that issue is unknown to most Christians. Eucharist and Communion are two names for the same thing.
 
5:27 PM
@fredsbend Follow that line of thought to it's full conclusion then.
 
Therefore, "Mass", if they know what a typical Catholic Mass entails, means songs, a sermon, and a little snack.
@svidgen The roots, the branches, the leaves and the fruit often look very different.
 
You've got "Catholic Mass", and then some folks who said, "we reject that" ... "let's have a worship service instead." It is, by that definition, "any form of worship that isn't a Catholic Mass." That encompasses a lot of variation ...
 
@svidgen I think there's a theological basis for the difference in names between (say) Catholic Mass, Orthodox Divine Liturgy, Lutheran worship service, and Quaker Meeting for Worship.
 
@svidgen That is a typical Catholic definition isn't it? Everything is defined as Catholic or not Catholic (heresy or invalid).
 
To illustrate that point, our (a Catholic High School's) senior religion class entailed an exploration of other religions. As part of that, we asked permission from other religious groups in the area to sit in on a worship service. In permission-granting groups, we were to report to the class what was meant by "worship service" as these various places ... and the differences can be pretty drastic.
@fredsbend Hehe ... in my experience, it's sort of the opposite. Die-hard Catholics are pretty discriminate about other denominations. Whereas other denominations have a fuzzy anti-Catholic bias and group themselves together with each other, even when their doctrines are glaringly incompatible.
I don't ignore the history, mind you. The schisms and offshoots are obvious. You can compare any given group's beliefs to the "original" beliefs by reading to the Church fathers. And, by my fully biased read, non-Catholic Christians are definitely deviating from "original Christianity." But, I don't read it as a rejection of Catholicism unless it is. Whereas my non-Catholic Christian friends and family have a much greater tendency to read non-Catholics, including themselves, as "non-Catholic."
After my now-wife became Catholic, my now-brother-in-law finally started seeing the heavy anti-Catholic identity of his then EV-Free community. They were an offshoot of an offshoot of an offshoot (ad infinitum?) -- no reason anymore to identify themselves in opposition to a Catholic doctrine. And still, they routinely introduced Catholic practices into their homilies (and pamphlets) with the purpose of showcasing "evil contortions of Christianity" that they had rejected.
Anywho ... point is, "worship service" is a bucket term for a lot of things. I'd never walk into a "worship service" with concrete expectations.
 
5:53 PM
@svidgen I think both exist. Protestants of incompatible denominations will only unify for one thing, and that is opposition to Catholicism. The historical context of this has stuck pretty well.
Actually, I just had a thought, that the repulsion of the Catholic church seemed at times to be political and not theological. There's the obvious Henry VIII, but I mean outside of that instance. Puritans "escaped" to the Americas, for example.
 
@fredsbend That was because they were having problems with the Anglicans, not because they were having problems with the Catholics.
(as I remember it)
 
Seriously, we need to start allowing Christian, political motivations questions, and in the broader sense, Christian culture:
1
Q: How should we handle questions about Christian culture?

fredsbendWe have recently received a few questions that were not on doctrine, per se, but actually reflected a curiosity about current Christian culture in a specific geographic area. Here are some examples: Are Christians in the North (USA) less likely to be Republican? What Doctrine Supports The Chr...

@MattGutting Yes, but political, not necessarily theological. The Anglican church at the time was a church-state (emp. on state).
 
Area 51 Proposal: Christianity (in Portugese)
 
True, but that's not related to , as you say, "the repulsion of the Catholic church seemed at times to be political and not theological"?
Unless you're talking about that as a specific example, in which case I agree.
@TRiG Interesting - though I know no Portuguese.
 
@MattGutting Yes, I see your point there. The main point I was going for is that denominational splits in the past had political motivations sometimes.
 
6:01 PM
brb
 
@TRiG I'm not sure how successful that will be. I went to Portugal and nearly everyone one knew English. Good luck to them, though.
 
(Psst ... @AJHenderson In your gravatar ... Who is it? ;)
 
@PaulVargas that's cole
I've posted that photo in here before I think
I decided to give him some time as the gravatar before baby takes over
any day now
official due date is tommorow
though that isn't looking like it is going to happen
 
@AJHenderson Oh! I guess you're a little restless.
 
0
Q: Would people be interested in these Area51 ads?

TRiGI ask here because I am unable to post these as suggested community ads myself: the images come from Area 51, so that the statistics automatically update. And the standard form does not allow non-imgur images. I think mods have a workaround. [![Stack Exchange Q&A site proposal: Hebrew Language...

 
6:18 PM
@fredsbend yeah. It's definitely political feeling in some cases. But the terminological drifts are primarily fueled by theological differences, I think.
And that's not mutually exclusive of the politics, mind you.
 
@PaulVargas yeah, a bit
the weekend wasn't bad, but being back at work today is brutal
atleast it was a long weekend this past weekend
or maybe it will end up being right on time, just got a call from the wife that she was worried because the baby was moving less
apparently it is typical for babies to start moving less the day before labor begins though
hope I don't end up regretting not bringing the camera to work with me today
(though I suspect I should have time to swing home and pick it and my wife up if it does start in the next few hours before the end of my day)
 
@AJHenderson How many minutes to arrive?
 
@PaulVargas I'm about 15 minutes from home and home is about 20 minutes from the hospital
and she hasn't even started early labor yet, sure, some people go straight to active labor, but that's rare
the funniest thing that could happen though would be for her to go in to sudden active labor when she is at work (though it would suck for me since I'd be woken up in the middle of the night)
but she works in a hospital, but not the right one
she works for the big hospital in the area, but they aren't the ones with the nicest birthing department
so she'd have to go from one hospital to another
 
@AJHenderson I guess there are other people (friends or family) at home.
 
6:41 PM
@PaulVargas no, just Danielle and the cats, she hasn't started any labor at all yet
I'll be going home whenever she starts the first stage of labor and we also have our executive pastor's wife who is also a certified duula
 
@AJHenderson Oh that's good to have
 
yeah,
particularly since we know her too
A duula is nice to have, but having a duula you know is even better
 
Some good suggestions for community ads:
Thanks @TRiG
 
6:56 PM
@AJHenderson Oh hey. Baby on the way?
 
@svidgen within the next week
due date tomorrow and they will induce on the 8th
if he hasn't decided to come out by then
 
@AJHenderson Fun stuff ... your first?
 
yeah
 
@AJHenderson May I offer one bit of unsolicited advice?
 
if you ask if you may offer it, isn't it half way solicited?
but sure
 
6:59 PM
... sleep. For the next 6 months. Every opportunity you have ... sleep.
 
@svidgen haha, yes, that one I was aware of
though actually, my wife and I are on different schedules which should help
 
When we have a new baby in the house, my bedtime goes from midnightish to ... like 8. And I still go to work horrendously underslept.
 
she's going to be home for two to three months and I will be home for probably a month working half time for half the month
 
@AJHenderson Good to hear. Sleep is precious!
 
but normally she works while I'm sleeping and I work while she is sleeping
if we continue the same with the baby, then someone will always be awake to help baby
 
7:02 PM
Cool. Well ... congrats!
 
and I'm highly looking forward to not having to call him baby all the time and instead be able to use his name in conversation
 
You have a name ready?
 
I managed to only screw it up once in the five months or so since we determined his name
not only his name, but he already has his own website
complete with it's own ip address so the enterprising reverse lookup user can't find it
 
Wow ... that kid's certainly got a head start!
 
well hey, if you are going to pick someone's name, why not pick a name you can control the domain for right?
granted I'm still not sure how you pronounce aousnf0as
 
7:05 PM
hehe
 
The Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS),also known as the Brazelton Neonatal Assessment Scale (BNAS), was developed in 1973 by Dr. T. Berry Brazelton and his colleagues. This test purports to provide an index of a newborn's abilities, and is usually given to an infant somewhere between the age of 3 days to 4 weeks old. This approach was innovative for recognizing that a baby is a highly developed organism, even when just newly born. The profile describes the baby's strengths, adaptive responses and possible vulnerabilities. This knowledge may help parents develop appropriate caregiving...
 
as luck would have it though, the first name we settled on also had the domain available (firstlast.com)
 
@AJHenderson ^^^ You may want to see that. :)
 
so my wanting to have domains for our kids has yet to be truly put to the test of having to throw out a name because of it
but yeah, my mistake with the name was on the phone with my parents. I was at home and put my parents on speaker phone and placed the phone on my wife's belly and said that "now ***** can hear you"
and then realized "oh crap"
luckily they didn't hear clearly and didn't have enough context to put together what just happened
 
@AJHenderson I don't understand. Why can't you use his name?
 
7:16 PM
@svidgen wife want's to keep it a secret
 
@AJHenderson Ah.
 
my condition was that the domain name be available, her condition was that we don't give away any more than initials (DJH) until he's born
 
David Jonah Henderson
I'll assume I nailed it for now ...
 
only one person actually guessed the first name correctly so far of all the guesses we have heard
 
The name that came to mind was actually Jonas. But if it's five letters and starts with a 'D'...
 
7:32 PM
5 letters?
 
6
5 for the middle though
but no, not jonah
I will give the hint that lots of people have guessed the middle name though
 
Daniel
Dillon
Dustin
 
actually, we both found it amusing that a lot of people guessed Daniel Jackson which hadn't even occurred to either of us, despite both being huge stargate fans
 
Not Dillion. That domain is still available. You better go and register all the d names before I figure it out.
Daniel and Dustin are still in the running.
So, what's your middle name, btw?
 
@fredsbend it doesn't take much investigation to find that out I don't think
 
7:40 PM
If it's Daniel, wow they grow up fast: danielhenderson.com
It it's dustin, I guess you've changed your mind: dustinhenderson.com
 
and yes, my middle name should be easily discoverable with fairly minimal investigation
it requires a little bit of digging, but I was able to find it with publicly available information that is known about me here
 
@AJHenderson Not too much digging at all: ajhenderson.com/2002/07/06/3
I would guess that your son's name is to be D----- James Henderson.
I will find it. The whois will give you away, unless you used a private reg.
 
@fredsbend you won't even need the whois to give me away I don't think
I didn't make much effort to disguise it if someone actually finds the page
just to prevent easy mechanisms to find the page
my thought is that if someone puts in the effort to find the page, then they deserve what they find
@fredsbend yeah, that's the reference I was going for
I had to double check to make sure I actually did have my full name listed there
I don't list it many places
because I never use my "full" name
 
7:57 PM
Duncan?
 
@svidgen Maybe. Domain is registered in GB. AJ lives in New England.
 
8:51 PM
@fredsbend Humm ... @AJHenderson lives in New York.
 
@PaulVargas New York is part of New England. New England is a term for the north eastern US
hence the large number of "new"s
New York, New Hampshire, New Jersey
 
@AJHenderson Sorry! I confused with 'GB' and 'England' of the @fredsbend's comment and the 'uk' in the whois. ;)
 
@PaulVargas I think he was indicating it wasn't likely
but it wasn't particularly clear
 
9:32 PM
@AJHenderson It's not dwight.
It's not donald.
I'm narrowing it down.
Not dennis. The domain was registered in 2012.
 
@AJHenderson Are you naming him after Bill Cosby's brother?
 
not darren
@BruceAlderman classic.
"Get outta the rain, dammit!" "But, Dad. I'm Jesus Christ."
not dwayne
not darryl
I give up for now.
 

« first day (1105 days earlier)      last day (3515 days later) »