Yeah. That's another thing about DW; it really does require strict adherence to the rules. But what's nice is, if something comes up that you don't know how to handle and you backtrack to the rules, you can almost always figure out by adjusting perspective. I think that's a basic summary of most DW Q&A here: "How does X work?"
"If you remember principles A and B, we can make X work by doing Z."
So, the protection requirement has always seemed extremely low to me. You can't post an answer on a protected question unless you have at least 10 rep, which is one upvote. My default behavior, now that I can protect things, would probably just be to preemptively protect all the things all the ...
When the question does not specify a system, but an educated guess can be made, other users often edit the tags themselves without waiting for the querent to confirm the system they are interested in.
Is this appropriate? If not then is it OK to roll-back the edit and comment? At what point is ...
